Smoking Rights






   

<< January 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31


Our Web Page

Ontario Health Promotion Resource System

Smokers Rights Canada

Forces

Our Newsletter


Anti Smokers:
National Clearinghouse on Tobacco and Health Program
Serves the information needs of health intermediaries.

How they Lie- The Truth







rss feed


Tuesday, January 04, 2005
the news that smokes

Owners told to call police

Wed, June 2, 2004

SMOKERS WHO REFUSE TO GIVE ID CAN'T BE CHARGED

By KEVIN CONNOR, TORONTO SUN

THE CITY'S new smoking bylaw has no teeth and isn't being enforced, bar staff say. Bar and restaurant staff who phoned the city's new smoking inspectors' hotline to report the bylaw was being broken were told to call the police.

"I was told to treat someone smoking in my establishment like you would a drunk and call the police. This is par for the course. It's the city," Vic Salerno, owner of Upfront Bar and Grill, said yesterday after calling inspectors to say the bylaw was being broken in his pub.

The city has assigned eight bylaw inspectors to enforce the smoking prohibition, which went into effect at midnight on June 1.

Other inspectors are supposed to enforce the bylaw as part of their daily routine.

But they aren't responding to calls.

"If we find someone smoking, they don't have to give us any ID like they would for the police. We can't charge them if we don't know their name," said smoking bylaw inspector John Coleman.

REFUSAL TO DO THE JOB

"If people want something done to stop someone from smoking they will have to phone the police and, honestly, I don't know if they would come."

Cops will not be enforcing the municipal smoking bylaw, said Toronto Police spokesman Const. Kristine Bacharach.

"It's the bylaw officers' job to enforce this bylaw, which doesn't appear to be thought through," Bacharach said.

A person who illegally lights a smoke is liable to be fined $255 -- a $205 fine, plus a $50 victim surcharge for the first offence. Repeat offenders could face fines of up to $5,000.

"There already is a lot less smoking in bars. Some folks are thumbing their nose at us but we will get to them," said Joe Mihevc, chairman of the Toronto Board of Health.

"We need to find a balance without being heavy-handed and let people get their heads around this.

"The best bylaws happen with education. There is a curve here and we will meet the curve."

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/06/02/482650.html 


Health boss kicks up storm -ON

BUSY YEAR FOR GEORGE

By ANTONELLA ARTUSO, QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU CHIEFSun, December 26, 2004

IN THE PROVINCIAL Liberal government's first year in office, no cabinet minister was under the media microscope more than "Furious" George Smitherman. The Ontario health minister was given the herculean task of taming a system where annual inflation runs upwards of 5%.

His enthusiastic efforts to transform the system eventually led to the NDP-imposed nickname "Furious" George for his rumoured tantrums with hospital execs.

"I see that people are characterizing me like a pit bull," Smitherman told reporters.

"I maintain that my bark is worse than my bite."

Smitherman suggested he was more "poodle" than pit bull. (A good thing since his government is ordering all pit bulls leashed and neutered.)

Smitherman's attempts to curb spending set off the province's hospital cleaners, who were not amused when he mused they could be paid less.

NOSE-TO-NOSE OVER DEAL

Hospital CEOs were told to balance their books, or else, and to stop building "Taj-ma hospitals."

The province's doctors went nose-to-nose with Smitherman over a derailed compensation deal.

He also suggested his coming provincewide smoking ban would take on private clubs and Legion halls, setting off smoker alarms across the province.

Finally, the health minister banned and then unbanned fresh sushi.

All in all, a busy year for the surprise standout in Premier Dalton McGuinty's cabinet.

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/12/26/797177-sun.html


Holiday spirit eluding Liberal government-ON
Wednesday December 29, 2004
Seaforth Huron Expositor — One must wonder if the Christmas spirit is eluding those in power this year as the provincial government conspicuously punts its cash cows while it simultaneously boosts taxes for everyone who dares to dwell under the Ontario sun.
It is of interest to note the province -- that consistently points to the $5.6-billion deficit from the previous Progressive Conservative-led government as the rationale for a dizzying array of odd initiatives -- is nonetheless willing and ready to allow Ontarians to bring their own wine into restaurants meaning less revenue for restaurateurs.
The government -- soon to be famously -- is also taking the chance on losing kazillions in tobacco tax revenue by rolling out plans for a province-wide smoking ban in public places effective 2006.
Not only will the move give a huge boost to the black market, it will also spell the end to a steady stream of tobacco tax revenue.
The province is also anti snack food, to the point where elementary schools can no longer house vending machines that carry such risqué items as chocolate bars laced with nougat.
What does this mean? Students must purchase candy off school grounds and school associations have fewer opportunities to make money for programs no longer covered by tax dollars.
Amusingly enough, the province is going to be reviewing the possibility of cutting back on the hours posted by gambling establishments.
This manoeuvre would lead to fewer jobs and a weakened economy.
Meanwhile, Ontarians are now paying a health-care premium and some property owners, including horse ranch and condo owners, are seeing their property reclassified as commercial and, therefore, face spiraling property tax hikes.
All told, the past year of Liberal leadership has led those who once sought a kinder, gentler Ontario to ask whatever happened to their best of intentions.
One must also wonder why the Liberals continue to focus on balancing the budget when the former government showed it could not be done at the current level of services, depleted though they were.
Perhaps instead of echoing the words of Tiny Tim with the plea, “please sir, can I have s’more?” Ontarians should ask the provincial government to meddle less.
Indeed, perhaps it is time for Dalton McGuinty’s crew to focus on drawing more jobs into the province rather than wringing out the last possible penny from the pockets of every working Joe and Jane in the land.
The Clinton News Record

http://www.seaforthhuronexpositor.com/index.php?id=591


Health Minister Marks New Year's Day by Congratulating Saskatchewan on Smoke-Free Status

    OTTAWA, Jan. 1 /CNW Telbec/ - Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh marked New Year's Day 2005 by congratulating Saskatchewan on its new province-wide smoking ban, which takes effect today. The new law bans smoking in all enclosed public places, including bars and restaurants, and prohibits the use of designated smoking rooms. This legislation follows on the heels of similar bans in Manitoba and New Brunswick, which took effect in October 2004.
    "I'm very encouraged that provinces and municipalities are taking steps to protect Canadians from the dangers of second-hand smoke," said Minister Dosanjh. "I would like to congratulate Saskatchewan. This strong smoking ban sets a positive example for the rest of the country. Early this year Health Canada will launch a new round of anti-tobacco advertising which will target the effects of second hand smoke."
    Heather Crowe, a longtime advocate of smoke-free workplaces, also welcomes the new legislation. Heather never smoked a day in her life, but spent her career working in the hospitality sector. She now has lung cancer - a result of her exposure to second-hand smoke. Heather has been a vocal non-smoking activist, attending numerous engagements in municipalities working towards smoke-free by-laws. "I am delighted that smoking will now be banned in
all public places in Saskatchewan," said Ms. Crowe.
    Every year, more than 45,000 Canadians die from disease or illness caused by using tobacco and at least 1,000 are non-smokers. Cigarette smoke is the number one cause of visible indoor air pollution and second-hand smoke exposes people to cancer-causing pollutants. The financial costs associated with employee smoking are also significant. The most recent conservative estimates from 1995 show annual costs per smoking employee can be up to $2,565 per year due to increased absenteeism, decreased productivity, increased life insurance premiums, and smoking area costs. The most recent figures from 1991 estimate that smoking costs the Canadian health care system approximately $3.5 billion
every year.
    The primary goal of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy (FTCS) is to reduce disease and death among Canadians. It recognizes that the key to success is comprehensive, integrated and sustained action, carried out in collaboration with all partners and directed at Canadians of all ages. Federal, provincial and territorial Ministers of Health are committed to working together to reduce tobacco consumption in Canada.
    Health Canada has resources available to help workplaces go smoke-free, including "Smoke-free Public Places: You Can Get There" and "Towards a Healthier Workplace: A Guidebook on Tobacco Control Policies". "Smoke-free Public Places" offers hands-on, easy-to-use resources to help municipalities and communities through the various stages of planning, implementing and evaluating non-smoking by-laws and policies in public places in their community. The "Guidebook" is designed to help employees and employers who are preparing to create or strengthen tobacco control policies in their workplace.
    These and other resources on second-hand smoke and help on how to quit smoking can be found at:
www.GoSmokefree.ca or by calling 1 800 O-Canada     (1 800-622-6232).
Egalement disponible en français
 

For further information: Media Inquiries:  Paul Duchesne, Health Canada, (613) 954-4807; Adèle Blanchard, Office of the Minister of Health, (613) 957-0200; Tricia Geddes, Office of the Minister of State (Public Health), (613) 941-8081; Public Inquiries: (613) 957-2991; Health Canada news
releases are available on the Internet at
http://media.health-canada.net
http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/January2005/01/c9474.html


All-out smoking ban believed excessive -ON
Regarding the letter, Expand smoking ban, (Dec. 26):
I have serious doubts whether J. M. Armstrong's point resonated with many of your newspaper's readers. Being a non-smoker myself, I believe my standpoint to be unbiased.
To refresh Armstrong's memory, the reason behind banning public consumption of beer or liquor is that alcohol is a controlled substance. As most people have seen others under the influence of alcohol behaving badly, this needs no further justification. Alcohol consumption in public leads to general disobedience, which can lead to riot.
I have yet to see any substantiated cases of disorderly conduct resulting from smoking tobacco.
I am wholeheartedly in support of smoke-free family restaurants, which children frequent. I feel that the smoke ban in relation to bars and taverns, and all pubic areas as suggested by Amstrong, is draconian and opens up the municipal, provincial and federal governments to another human rights debacle.
Eaton Kwan
Sarnia

London Free Press


Melfort hotel lays off workers, fears smoking ban will hurt business -SK

Broadcast News December 29, 2004

MELFORT -- A co-owner of a hotel in Melfort fears the upcoming province-wide smoking ban could cut her business by 60 per cent.

Waneta Goldstein at the Chances R Hotel says she's giving early notice to two employees so they can take full advantage of their employment insurance.

Starting Jan. 1, smoking will be banned in all indoor public places, including restaurants and bars.

Goldstein says if business is better than expected, she'll rehire the two workers.

Lilian Campbell -- one of those facing a layoff -- says she understands the move by her employer, but finding a new job won't be easy at this time of year

http://www.canada.com/search/story.html?id=58a8d9c9-3523-438e-a7d8-2ac79247e021


Police hunt for shooting suspect -ON

Man shot after feud in Bank St. building

By LAURA CZEKAJ, Ottawa SunWed, December 29, 2004

A convict out of jail on statutory release is being hunted by police after he allegedly shot a man in the leg following a dispute about smoking in an apartment building hallway. Ottawa police have released a photograph of Rabih Ahmed Hamade, 25, who is wanted on weapons-related charges.

WEAPON NOT FOUND

The firearm, which might have been a shotgun, was not recovered by police, said Staff Sgt. Anda Pember.

"(Hamade) is to be considered armed and dangerous," said Pember. "If the public sees him they are to call 911 immediately."

The shooting occurred at about 8:40 p.m. Monday after a 39-year-old man staying in a ninth-floor apartment at 1365 Bank St. asked his neighbour not to smoke in the hallway.

The suspect went into his apartment and a woman who was with him had words with the victim before also going inside. Soon after, the suspect opened his door and shot the victim in the leg below the knee. The victim fled inside his apartment for safety and the suspect escaped.

A tactical unit tried to flush the suspect out of the apartment before discovering he was long gone.

The victim was treated and released from hospital.

Hamade had been released on statutory release while serving a four-year sentence for attempted murder and weapons-related charges in connection with a nightclub shooting in 2001.

MAY BE WITH FEMALE

Hamade is described as 5-foot-10, about 200 lbs., and was last seen wearing a white top, blue jeans and a grey winter jacket. He might be with a white female who has blonde hair and blue eyes.

Anyone with information about Hamade's whereabouts is asked to call police at 236-1222, ext. 3212 or 3566.

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/OttawaSun/News/2004/12/29/800239-sun.html


Waiting game -ON

Kim Novak
Friday December 17, 2004

Simcoe Reformer — It’s not like we didn’t see it coming.
The anti-smoking legislation tabled by the province on Wednesday is one of the few election promises the provincial Liberals have managed to keep.
Still, the Liberals’ tough stance on smoking wasn’t something they created in the last election.
During a whistle stop in Simcoe during the 1999 election campaign, Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty didn’t shy away from letting his views on the subject be known. This, despite the fact he was seeking votes in Ontario’s tobacco belt.
At the time, many local political watchers speculated his comment lost his party the local vote.
In last year’s provincial election, McGuinty didn’t need the Norfolk vote to get his majority. Problem is this area could certainly use the $50 million he pledged prior to the election.
Some have speculated that the new anti-smoking law - that will basically make all public spaces in Ontario smoke-free - will be the final nail in the coffin for this province’s tobacco industry. However, the writing has been on the wall for some time. Fewer users means less product is needed. It’s reasoning that shouldn’t be that shocking, after all, similar logic is at play with schools - fewer students means fewer schools.
But, while it is easy to understand about the downturn in the industry, it is not easy to understand why the government is dragging its heels on giving tobacco growers the $50 million they were promised not so long ago.
Few can argue against the hazards of smoking. And the issue of rights and freedoms of some individuals over others will likely rage in reference to this issue, at least in the near future. But, throughout it all, the plight of the farmers has been lost.
Certainly, the tobacco industry has been lucrative for growers in past years, and continues to add a great deal to the local economy. But, the decline has been steady and grows worse with each passing year.
All the while, governments have reaped the rewards of high taxation on the product - even as they targeted the product as being a “killer” or in the words of Health Minister George Smitherman “the No. 1 killer in Ontario.” This despite the fact it is a legal product. The province pats itself on the back for introducing the toughest smoking ban in the country, but stops short of declaring the product illegal. Go figure.
While we commend our MPP Toby Barrett for calling for a public hearing on the smoking ban we feel his energies might be better spent on making sure the Liberals stick to their campaign promise of providing $50 million for the growers.
“At this point, we are getting a little tired of hearing help is on the way,” tobacco board chair Fred Neukamm said after Wednesday’s announcement. “It’s time we got concrete action.”
“We’ve got farmers wanting and needing to exit the industry. We need to dollars to do that.”
We agree.
We also agree with Barrett’s assessment that tobacco growers “just want to make ends meet for their families. They want to pay off their debts. They want to move on.”
Funds from the province would go a long way in reaching that goal.
Still, we have to realize that tobacco growers are pawns in a political game. There’s no way the Liberals would announce $50 million in aid to farmers before they announced a tobacco ban. And there’s no way they’d announce the $50 million in aid at the same time as the smoking ban.
We don’t expect a big press conference by Mr. McGuinty to announce the funding. We don’t even expect a photo op with Agriculture Minister Steve Peters.
We just expect the money.

http://www.simcoereformer.ca/story.php?id=133221


Smoking bylaw enforcement difficult, says health board
Officials at the Prairie North Health Region say enforcing Saskatchewan’s new Tobacco Control Act could present enforcement challenges for public health inspectors as they monitor eateries and bars on the Saskatchewan side of Lloydminster.

Ian Ross Wednesday December 29, 2004

Lloydminster Meridian Booster — Officials at the Prairie North Health Region say enforcing Saskatchewan’s new Tobacco Control Act could present enforcement challenges for public health inspectors as they monitor eateries and bars on the Saskatchewan side of Lloydminster.
The TCA comes into effect on Jan. 1, 2005 and prohibits smoking in all restaurants and bars in Saskatchewan.
“In the context of Lloydminster it presents an enforcement challenge for us and one may argue that it may become a public relations challenge for us at the regional health authority,” said Fan. “Within the confines of the city of Lloydminster, the Prairie North Regional Health Authority and the public health inspectors who we employ have the inherent responsibility to enforce the public health act, in this case the Tobacco Control Act, but only on the Saskatchewan side.”
On the Alberta side, there is no similar legislation. Fan said when it comes to enforcement, applying the law differently within the same city could be more challenging than anticipated.
“That is something we believe will be a very difficult task for us,” said Fan.
Glennys Uzelman, vice-president of primary care services at the health region, agrees with Fan. She said inspectors will be out in pairs, usually on evenings and weekends when they’ll be able to blend easier with the crowd at bars.
“The fines are meant to be a deterrent and the public health inspectors will have a solid presence in Saskatchewan,” said Uzelman. “They will be doing inspections and responding to complaints and if need be, they will be ticketing establishments that are not working within that law. It will create some dilemmas with some businesses who won’t be terribly happy because of the differences in the city.”
Within the scope of municipal politics, city officials have the ability to pass a bylaw that would make the whole city smoke-free.
“We have had some very preliminary discussions with city officials, but a bylaw is certainly up to the politicians and the municipal government for that community,” she said.

http://www.meridianbooster.com/story.php?id=134882


City is unfair closing smoke shacks -ON
The Chronicle Journal Jan. 3/05
A letter to the Editor
The no-smoking by-law came into effect on July 1. Since that time the two bars that I operate on Simpson St. have declined in sales by 20 percent and 40 per cent respectively. At both locations the smokers have to stand on the sidewalk to smoke because there is no place else for them to go.
At location one, I constructed a heated shelter in the back lane and attached to the hotel. I was informed by the smoking inspector that the structure is on city property and I must remove it. The structure is only four feet wide and it is in no way interfering with the traffic that uses the lane, including the city garbage trucks.
At my second location I constructed a shelter at the back of the hotel on the hotel property adjacent to the back lane.This structure was also deemed illegal by the smoking inspector because it is not three meters from the delivery door and the fire exit door.
In my opinion, the city city was very unfair in the first place to impose a 100 per cent no-smoking by-law without any concessions, options, or regard for the bar operators and our customers.
I am doing the best that I can considering my limited space to work with to accommodate my customers and to help my business survive. It seems to me that our city council is not interested in supporting us in any way.
I think it is important for the general public to understand that our bars are not drunk tanks. We are social clubs who play an important role in our community. We employ people, pay large taxes, support charities, shelters and all types of sports just to name a few of our contributions to our community. We need support right now from our council and the general public to help us to get through this transition that we are struggling with.
Can you imagine our city with more bootleggers than licensed establishments?
Don Perry
Newfie's Pub, The Empire Hotel
Thunder Bay, Ont.

Chroniclejournal.com


Anti-tobacco battle smoulders on -ON
Ontario joining provinces that ban all public smoking Fewer and fewer places to light up across Canada

JAMES MCCARTEN, Jan. 3, 2005.
CANADIAN PRESS
If the old adage about strength in numbers is true, then the countless ranks of Canada's estimated 4.7 million smokers who plan to kick the habit for good in 2005 should take heart.

  The province of Ontario is trying to quit, too. So are Newfoundland and Saskatchewan.

  Canada's most populous province is poised to join the growing ranks of provincial governments that are banning smoking virtually everywhere, from bars and restaurants to casinos and Legion halls. "There's been more progress this year than in any other single year at the provincial level," said Michael Purley, director of Ontario Campaign For Action on Tobacco, an organization founded by five health agencies, including the Ontario Medical Association, in 1992.

  "This has been a huge year for progress right across the country, but Ontario's been leading the way at the local level, and now is poised to pick up a leadership role at the provincial level as well."

  Manitoba and New Brunswick both went smoke-free in October, and Saskatchewan butts out for good in public places Jan. 1. Newfoundland announced just weeks ago that it would follow suit in the spring.

  Ontario's legislation, introduced Dec. 15, would force everyone to butt out almost everywhere other than at home or outdoors starting May 31, 2006. It was billed as the most comprehensive in North America. Quitting still has its side effects, though: exiled smokers, irritable pub owners, a dip in revenues at blackjack tables and video lottery terminals and the costs of heated patios.

  In Newfoundland, where smoking has long been banned in restaurants but permitted in pubs, bar owners are incensed.

  "These are small businesses in every sense of the word," said Luc Erjavec, the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association's vice-president for Atlantic Canada.

  "With average annual revenues of just $205,000 and razor-thin profit margins of just 4.4 per cent, a smoking ban will devastate the pub and bar sector in this province."

  In a survey of New Brunswick pubs, taverns and nightclubs, the association found that nearly three-quarters of establishments have seen business drop off with the smoking ban.

  "It has simply driven smokers out of pubs and bars, and into homes and cars," Erjavec said.

  Not even jail offers a safe haven any more. Prisons across Canada have been embracing the trend toward smoke-free.

  There were other victories in the anti-tobacco camp in 2004.

  Canada ratified the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, a global public-health treaty, and is moving forward on banning the words "light" and "mild" from tobacco product labels and introducing "fire-safe" cigarettes, which self-extinguish when left unattended.

  Not everyone is hailing 2004 as a banner year, however.

   "It's been more negative than positive, although there have been some positive things," said Garfield Mahood, executive director of the Non-Smoker's Rights Association.

  Mahood acknowledged the provincial bans and hailed Ontario's law as a major step forward, but said he won't celebrate until the law is passed.

  It was also the year smokers started standing up for themselves — even if it was with the help of the Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council, which pays for mychoice.ca, an Internet-based lobby for smokers. "It's not that you want to turn back the clock to pre-smoking ban days or force yourself on non-smokers," the website tells members, "but a little balance that allows for reasonable compromise would be nice."

  As well as the many tobacco lawsuits winding their way through the courts, next year's main event against Big Tobacco is expected to centre on so-called "power walls" — the massive cigarette displays that loom over virtually every convenience store counter in the free world.

  "In 2002, the industry paid $77 million to retailers across the country for retail promotional space, so it has a very, very vested interest in fighting these bans as far as it can," Purley said.

  Saskatchewan was the first province to try to ban the displays with a controversial 2002 law that is scheduled to be challenged in the Supreme Court in January. Manitoba is holding off on its proposed law until then.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1103885176269&call_page=TS_Ontario&call_

pageid=968256289824&call_pagepath=News/Ontario&pubid=968163964505&StarSource=email&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tacodalogin=yes


Ontario Tourism figures

 - US border crossings18.1% decreased since 2002 (before sars), decreased 1.3% in the first 3 quarters compared to Jan- Sept. of 2003

- travel to US increased 6.3% for Jan- Sept. of 2004  compared to Jan- Sept 2004.  When compared to Jan -Sept of 2002 increased 2.9%

http://www.tourism.gov.on.ca/english/tourdiv/research/tff-winter_2004_e.pdf


Two-tier smoking ban draws rile
 

By Jean Lian Sunday December 26, 2004

By Jean Lian — While businesses across Saskatchewan butt out when the province-wide smoking ban kicks in on Jan. 1, the same cannot be said for casinos on Indian reserves.
The Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN) does not intend to comply with the smoking ban, citing the Constitution Act of 1876 which puts Indian reserves under federal jurisdiction as a reason for exempting Indian-run casinos from the provincial smoking ban.
FSIN First Vice-Chief Morley Watson reiterated in its Dec. 20 press release that “the issue is jurisdiction, and within that, the ability of First Nations to create their own laws that are truly reflective of their communities.”
He cited the Lac La Ronge Indian band which enacted a complete smoking ban in public places and the Saskatoon Tribal Council which has been making its buildings smoke-free since 1993 as examples of communities around the province enacting their own rules.
“In any situation where federal legislation, including a First Nations bylaw, is inconsistent or at odds with provincial legislation, the federal legislation takes precedent in any cases where division of powers allow for this,” said Watson.
Nevertheless, Watson indicated FSIN’s willingness to engage in a dialogue with the provincial government as there are “often areas in which federal and provincial legislation ends up, often quite unintentionally, at cross purposes.”
FSIN’s position on the smoking ban has drawn rile from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) who criticized this as a “two-tier smoking ban”.
It stressed that if the provincial government is to be “perceived as fair and equitable”, provincial laws must apply equally to all and not “treat its citizens differently based on their ancestry”, said CTF director Tania Fiss.
CTF also cited Section 88 of the Indian Act that allows for all laws of general application in any province to be applicable to Indians in the province, a point that Canadian Cancer Society’s senior policy analyst and lawyer Rob Cunningham agrees with.
“It is clear legally that the provincial law of general application does apply to reserves,” Cunningham said.
He cited the Highway Traffic Act and laws regulating gambling as well as occupational health and safety as examples of provincial law of general application being implemented across the board.
“We’re very concerned about the high rate of cancer and smoking among the First Nations community in Saskatchewan,” said Cunningham. “Everyone should be protected from health effects of smoke regardless of where they work.”
The cancer society who sees the smoking ban as “a health issue” is adopting a wait-and-see attitude and hopes the matter can be resolved before Jan. 1.
“We’re disappointed,” said the cancer society’s Donna Pasiechnik on the FSIN’s position.Continued from front page
“One of the most important aspects of the smoking ban is to protect workers from second-hand smoke,” especially those working in the hospitality industry, added Pasiechnik.
The cancer society is partnering with regional health authorities across the province to launch a media campaign to support smoke-free businesses.
Drawing a moderate voice of concern with regards to FSIN’s position is the Hotels Association of Saskatchewan.
“I think FSIN realizes the smoking ban is going to be very damaging to their position,” said the hotel association’s executive vice-president Tom Mullin.
He is “not surprised” that FSIN decided not to comply with the smoking ban but is concerned about the issue of “level playing field” and the impact on other casinos and businesses if the smoking ban is not applied to Indian-run casinos such as those in Prince Albert, Yorkton and North Battleford.
“Right now, it’s in the government’s hands,” said Mullin who describes the smoking ban as “an economic issue”.

http://www.meadowlakeprogress.com/story.php?id=134475


Compliance, defiance as Whitehorse butts out -NT
WebPosted Jan 3 2005 10:59 AM MST

WHITEHORSE - Whitehorse is now officially a smoke-free city.

The bylaw banning smoking in bars came into effect as revellers rang in the new year at midnight Friday.

 But not everyone was happy about butting out.

 "I think it's crap," said one bar patron. "I don't smoke but ... a bar is a smoking place with beer or liquor drinkers. Take it away – it's people's choice. You either go to a bar or you go to a non-smoking bar, but people should have the choice, not rules."

 A woman in a corner shook her head as she blew a grey cloud of smoke into the air. "I ain't gonna butt out for nobody."

 That attitude may change over the next few months as bar owners remove ash trays and post non-smoking signs.

 The smoking bylaw will be enforced on a complaint-driven basis. Bars and smokers who fail to comply could face a fine from the City of Whitehorse.

http://north.cbc.ca/regionalnews/caches/jan3smokers132005.html


Raging to the end
An intimate look at a dying woman's anti-smoking crusade
She influenced thousands but secretly smoked to the last

KIM HUGHES Jan. 2, 2005. 01:00 AM 

Barb's Miracle:

How Barb Tarbox Transformed Her Deadly Cancer into a Lifesaving Crusade

by David Staples and Greg Southam

River Books, 155 pages, $19.95

Barb's Miracle, an up-close chronicle of the dying days of anti-smoking activist Barb Tarbox, demands a lot from the reader. In this instance, forewarned is forearmed.

The book asks us to witness, in unvarnished words and pictures, Tarbox's agony as she succumbs to lung and brain cancer. It asks us to sympathize with the less savoury aspects of her blunt anti-tobacco campaign, which she famously and heroically took to some 50,000 students in Canada between November 2002 and April 2003.

Most significantly, Barb's Miracle asks us to believe that Tarbox's firebrand speeches, her unflagging energy and single-mindedness were not simply the courageous legacy of a rueful chainsmoker but a real miracle; a palpable act of God played out on Earth for all to see.

If the first two demands are surmountable for most, the last stumped even author David Staples, an Edmonton Journal reporter and an admitted agnostic. "I'm a newspaper journalist," Staples states in his foreword, "and I work to be objective and skeptical, qualities essential to succeeding at my craft ... In the final months of Barb's life, I did witness something ... If a miracle is to be believed, it must withstand scrutiny. This one does."

With that, we embark shotgun style with Staples and Journal photographer Greg Southam as they shadow Tarbox and her best friend Tracy Mueller through the horrible yet strangely affirming passage of terminal illness. It's a bumpy ride.

By now Tarbox's story is familiar. A lifelong smoker, the Edmonton homemaker was diagnosed with terminal cancer in late 2002. Determined to use her suffering as a means of scaring others away from the demon tobacco, Tarbox began giving warts-and-all lectures to students in schools.

Her dramatic delivery resonated, and soon Tarbox was fielding speaking offers from across the country and making appearances on radio and TV. Tarbox was front page news in Canada, and Staples produces copious correspondence from the public suggesting her missives hit the intended targets. Smokers quit smoking and kids vowed never to begin.

But Tarbox, who died in May 2003 at age 42, was not without controversy. She smoked to the very end, refusing to add nicotine withdrawal to her list of ailments (stopping wouldn't have saved her anyway). She placed enormous demands on her friends and family, especially Mueller, who took an extended leave of absence from work to act as Tarbox's ad hoc road manager.

It was a Herculean job by anyone's measure, especially since Mueller was also was required to buy cigarettes for Tarbox, who feared the bad publicity such a purchase would inevitably bring.

Tarbox chose to accept speaking engagements rather than using her final months to, say, write a journal to her coming-of-age daughter or husband. Moreover, Tarbox plainly lacked the humility we've come to prefer in our homegrown heroes. When the media came calling, she was gussied up and ready with a sound bite.

Which brings us to Barb's Miracle and some pretty germane questions, namely: Can the author or photographer offer something we haven't already seen before? And who exactly is this book for?

The answer to the former is a decided draw. Southam and Staples had remarkable access not just to Tarbox but to her family, friends, physicians, clergy and the thousands of kids who attended (and were irrevocably moved by) her powerful lectures. Yet the presentation of stories and anecdotes is surprisingly dry.

"On the way home, we stopped at a restaurant," Staples writes. "I sat next to Barb. As she ate, I saw the white goo she had previously mentioned at the corner of her mouth. I also caught a whiff of medicine from her, a hospital smell, one I associated with disease. I lost my appetite."

While one applauds Staples' reluctance to court overt sentimentality, a story like this cries out for emotional ballast, especially when set against Southam's unusually intimate black and white portraits. Barb's Miracle gives us straight recitation of fact.

To his credit, Staples keeps the proselytizing in check, sparing us the ubiquitous statistics about tobacco use and death, instead focusing on Tarbox. He even suggests Tarbox's continued smoking actually bolstered her message, underscoring the nefarious power of cigarette addiction.

Just what kind of reader this book is for is more debatable. Certainly, anyone who witnessed one of Tarbox's lectures or those who found the strength to quit smoking based on her testimonials — used to full affect by the Alberta government in its anti-smoking campaigns — will cherish the behind-the-scenes glimpses of this most astonishing woman.

But even supporters might feel uneasy with the author's submission that Tarbox was somehow imbued with strength from the beyond. Maybe she was just an amazingly focused woman. Maybe Staples, despite his journalistic defences, was simply swept up by the power of Tarbox's performances. Certainly, the author makes clear that's exactly what her speeches were — polished, well-executed performances — despite the altruistic message at their core.

Or maybe, as Staples also ultimately suggests, we as a society need to revisit our notions of what miracles are. But, as stated, that is asking a lot of a reader, especially one at the end of a story about a woman who, good deeds notwithstanding, died an awful, premature death. One is reluctant to give credit for Tarbox's remarkable feat to anyone but the woman herself.

 Toronto freelance writer and editor Kim Hughes is a lead reviewer for amazon.ca.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1104580866656


Husky goes non-smoking

By Darby Gilbertson, Tuesday January 04, 2005

Pincher Creek Echo — As of Jan. 1, patrons of the Husky restaurant at Pincher Station will have to leave their cigarette cravings at the door, as the establishment is implementing a no smoking policy.
“We’re going to try it out and see how it goes,” says Margaret Afdahl, Husky restaurant manager. “I have nothing against smokers or non smokers (but) it’s very hard on the staff to work in that environment.”
Afdahl says she has fielded several complaints about the smoky atmosphere from both customers and staff, noting the poor ventilation system in the building makes it difficult for the workers who are exposed to the smoke for eight hour days.
While as of Jan. 1, 2005 the Town of Pincher Creek is enforcing a bylaw, which bans smoking in any enclosed public premise where minors are allowed, Afdahl notes that, as part of the MD, she isn’t subject to the bylaw.
“Nobody’s forcing me to do this,” states Afdahl.
“I’m going to try it out, if I don’t lose too much business, I’m going to stay that way.”
However, Afdahl says response she’s received from some of the customers has been “terrible.”
“One guy went up to the waitress and told her to get a different job if the smoke bothers her,” says Afdahl.
While Afdahl says she can sympathize with the smokers, she says the smoking in the restaurant has become excessive.
“One day I counted 28 cigarettes in an ashtray,” says Afdahl.
“Even some of the smokers are complaining.”

http://www.pinchercreekecho.com/story.php?id=135443


Health Committee

13th May 2004 (Session 2)

Evidence Received for
The Prohibition of Smoking in Regulated Areas (Scotland) Bill

SUBMISSION FROM IMPERIAL TOBACCO LIMITED

General comments

Imperial Tobacco Limited welcomes this first opportunity to submit evidence on the Prohibition of Smoking in Regulated Areas (Scotland) Bill provided by the Health Committee.

Whether or not to ban or severely restrict smoking in public places is an issue for debate. We recognise that other people's tobacco smoke can be unpleasant or annoying, and raises health concerns for many. We also accept that some non-smokers would prefer not to be exposed to other people's smoke, and that therefore some sensible accommodation is required.

Whilst it may be sensible to place some restrictions on where and when people can smoke, we do not believe that unjustifiable restrictions or wholesale bans are necessary. We believe that an accommodation to satisfy both smokers and non-smokers can be found through sensible arrangements, defined by local needs and circumstances.

The Prohibition of Smoking in Regulated Areas (Scotland) Bill is an example of unjustifiable and excessive regulation. The Bill seeks to ban smoking in any enclosed public space where food is supplied or consumed. In practical terms, it will impose a ban on smoking in a wide variety of establishments, including restaurants, pubs and bars. It will also impose potentially unworkable restrictions upon some clubs, hotels, village and community halls or centres and other similar facilities.

This Bill sets out a `reasonable' and balanced approach to the issue of public smoking, but in effect will impose a ban on public smoking across a wide range of establishments. Whilst the preparation and consumption of food is used as the basis for the proposed restrictions, the Policy Memorandum fails to put forward a single argument linking the issue of food and smoking.

General principles behind the Bill

The debate about the regulation of smoking in public places, including the workplace, has intensified in recent months with a number of national and local organisations publicly stating their support for further regulation. Imperial Tobacco believes that such calls are misplaced and unfounded for a number of reasons:

The science

The scientific evidence, based upon around sixty studies, does not demonstrate that Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) causes lung cancer, heart disease or other diseases in non-smokers when considered as a whole. The five largest studies produced inconsistent findings with one reporting a small increase in risk, three reporting no statistically significant increase in risk, and one reporting a statistically significant decrease in risk.

Where a statistically significant association was reported, the magnitude of relative risk reported was so small (typically below 2.0) that it would generally be regarded as too weak by conventionally accepted epidemiological standards to form the basis for public health policy 1. The UK Government has provided its own view on relative risk factors: "A stronger association - of greater than 2 - is more likely to reflect causation than is a weaker association - of less than 2 - as this is more likely to result from methodological biases or to reflect indirect associations which are not causal" 2.

Small increases in relative risk are sometimes reported in percentage terms. A relative risk of 1.2, for example, is often popularised as a 20% increase in risk, giving an impression that if 100 people were exposed to the risk, 20 of them would contract the disease. This is highly misleading. A 20% increase in a number that is small produces a number that is still small. To put it simply, a relative risk of 1.2 for a disease for which the incidence is 10 per 100,000 per year in a non-exposed population implies that the incidence is 12 per 100,000 per year in an exposed population.

Consequently the studies that have been conducted, when combined, show a relative risk to lung cancer of about 1.2 for spouses of smokers and of 1.1 for colleagues of smokers at work. This compares with diesel exhaust fumes (2.6) and electromagnetic fields (3.2), which in line with normal statistical practice on such studies are treated as not significant and within experimental error. Similar numbers are produced for population studies on ETS and heart disease.

Although the views of many in the medical and regulatory communities are unequivocal, there are notable exceptions. The editor of the British Medical Journal, which is strongly anti-tobacco, recently stated: "We are certainly interested in whether passive smoking kills, and it's clear to us that the question has not been definitively answered. Indeed it may never be answered definitively. It's a hard question, and our methods are inadequate". 3

In general, however, it is extremely difficult to achieve any rationale dialogue on the science, as regulators have adopted the position they wish to for political purposes from the highly inconclusive data and do not engage on the statistical and rather esoteric scientific issues.

To summarise, we do not believe that the scientific evidence, taken as a whole, is sufficient to establish that other people's tobacco smoke is a cause of any disease. The population studies which have led to claims of any health risk are subject to methodological flaws, but at most indicate a very small risk. As a result we do not believe that prohibitions on smoking in an "enclosed public space" where food is supplied and consumed are justified by the scientific/health arguments.

Choice and fairness

Central to this debate are the concepts of choice and fairness. Smokers and non-smokers are reasonable people who are looking for fairness and balance. This issue can be resolved through common sense and courtesy, and by introducing practical solutions such as well-ventilated smoking and no-smoking areas. The bottom line is about giving people choice and information, and letting them decide.

It is clear that ventilation and air filtration can provide substantial improvements in air quality, and do so in many situations including operating theatres, electronic manufacturing sites, and elsewhere. Thus even the annoyance of other people's smoke can be eliminated or reduced to a minimum.

It is often portrayed that a majority are in favour of bans - this is not the case. Recent evidence from the largest surveys presently conducted suggest that a large majority - somewhere between 57 and 76% of people are against a ban on smoking in bars and pubs. These are not figures produced by the tobacco industry, but rather the London Health Commission's `Big Smoke Debate'4, MORI/the Greater London Authority poll 5 and MORI/SmokeFree London UK poll 6.

Whilst an undisputed majority of people wish to see the provision of non-smoking areas increased, it has not expressed a view that this should be achieved by prohibiting smoking when voluntary, self-regulation is proving to be increasingly effective.

Significant progress has been made by the Scottish Voluntary Charter on Smoking in Public Places, which mirrors the agreement with the hospitality industry operating in England and Wales. Whilst further and more rapid progress is always desirable, it would be nonsense to reject the Scottish Voluntary Charter outright at a time when the UK Government is negotiating with the hospitality industry in England and Wales for higher compliance levels within an accelerated timeframe.

The Bill defines restaurants and other places were food is served and consumed and `communicating spaces' as being "public places". However, these are not generally public places or spaces. They are privately owned premises. Authorities should not have a natural right to control how they are operated. Whether an establishment permits, prohibits or otherwise regulates smoking is rightly a matter for the owner/operator to determine. They know what makes good business sense to provide what their customers want. Where there is a demand for a smoking ban, or for separate areas for smokers and non-smokers, commercial operators will and do respond with appropriate local initiatives. If they do not respond to local concerns, then their trade will suffer.

The Bill assumes that consumers or customers are somehow compelled to eat food in areas that may also permit smoking. This is clearly not the case. Consumers are in no way compelled to give their custom to an establishment if they do not care for some aspect of the place. Smoking may only be one out of many and varied reasons for customers to choose not to patronise a particular establishment.

The Bill supposedly only prohibits smoking in certain enclosed public spaces. However the definition of a regulated area is written in such terms as is likely to lead to much dispute and argument and in many instances would effectively ban smoking throughout in certain establishments. The definitions of `regulated area' and the inclusion of `connecting spaces' including stairways and passageways as a public space will force very many establishments, particularly the smaller ones, to choose between the serving of food or allowing smoking. This is not a reasonable measure but rather the introduction of a part smoking ban under the guise of considered regulation.

One of the suggested principles behind the Bill is that food must not be served or consumed in the same area as smoking. Whilst some customers may not find this desirable, no evidence or argument is put forward making any link between the consuming of food and smoking.

Practical implications

The Bill will impose potentially unworkable restrictions upon some clubs, hotels, village and community halls or centres and other similar facilities. The requirement that an enclosed space must be smoke free for five days before food is provided should be of particular concern to hotels where the use of conference and private rooms may need to be varied from day to day. The rule itself is wholly unwarranted and not justifiable on any sensible grounds.

The Bill legislates for all premises where food is supplied and consumed, taking no account of the vast variety in premises. This single regime for such regulated areas will have significant cost implications for proprietors. The costs of compliance for any person providing food and wishing to provide facilities for smokers outside the area where the food is provided would, in many instances, be high and for a great many would be prohibitive, potentially involving design, layout and structural changes to the premises that in cost would far exceed any possible savings.

There have been high-profile public smoking bans in New York and Ireland in recent months. It will be some time before the true economic cost of these bans is known. Surveys do show mixed results - with those claiming no or a positive impact receiving more publicity. Others do show a negative impact. For instance, the Vinters' Federation of Ireland commissioned ICR (International Communications Research) to conduct a study exploring the effects of the smoking ban in New York City on 300 businesses in September and October 2003.

 Two-thirds of responding establishments said they were seeing fewer customers now than when the ban went into effect.

Consultation

Imperial Tobacco did not make a submission to the Member's consultation in 2001 on the proposal of Ken Gibson. Consequently we were not invited to submit evidence in the 2003 consultation undertaken by Stewart Maxwell. As a result, this is the first time that Imperial Tobacco has submitted evidence to the Scottish Parliament's consideration of this issue.

Imperial Tobacco does not make any excuses for opposing a ban or unreasonable restrictions on public smoking. As a company producing a controversial product, we are willing to accept sensible and practical regulation and will participate in dialogue with governments and regulators to achieve this. However, we do not regard this measure as reasonable.

We do have a commercial interest in this issue - the fact is that millions of people like to smoke with a meal or when they are having a drink. But we also believe we have a legitimate right to defend the rights of these customers - over one million of whom live in Scotland. We do not believe that it is fair or just to make potential criminals out of these one million smokers.

Concluding remarks

The key issue on public smoking is how large (if any) is the risk, and what should be done to protect non-smokers from the small risk (if any) or at least the very real annoyance which is caused to


Posted at 6:52 pm by looped_ca
Make a comment

Monday, January 03, 2005
Fears and Reality Need to be Seen

Health Minister Marks New Year's Day by Congratulating Saskatchewan on Smoke-Free Status     OTTAWA, Jan. 1 /CNW Telbec/ - Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh marked New Year's Day 2005 by congratulating Saskatchewan on its new province-wide smoking ban, which takes effect today. The new law bans smoking in all enclosed public places, including bars and restaurants, and prohibits the use of designated smoking rooms. This legislation follows on the heels of similar bans in Manitoba and New Brunswick, which took effect in October 2004.
    "I'm very encouraged that provinces and municipalities are taking steps to protect Canadians from the dangers of second-hand smoke," said Minister Dosanjh. "I would like to congratulate Saskatchewan. This strong smoking ban sets a positive example for the rest of the country. Early this year Health Canada will launch a new round of anti-tobacco advertising which will target the effects of second hand smoke."
    Heather Crowe, a longtime advocate of smoke-free workplaces, also welcomes the new legislation. Heather never smoked a day in her life, but spent her career working in the hospitality sector. She now has lung cancer - a result of her exposure to second-hand smoke. Heather has been a vocal non-smoking activist, attending numerous engagements in municipalities working towards smoke-free by-laws. "I am delighted that smoking will now be banned in
all public places in Saskatchewan," said Ms. Crowe.
    Every year, more than 45,000 Canadians die from disease or illness caused by using tobacco and at least 1,000 are non-smokers. Cigarette smoke is the number one cause of visible indoor air pollution and second-hand smoke exposes people to cancer-causing pollutants. The financial costs associated with employee smoking are also significant. The most recent conservative estimates from 1995 show annual costs per smoking employee can be up to $2,565 per year due to increased absenteeism, decreased productivity, increased life insurance premiums, and smoking area costs. The most recent figures from 1991 estimate that smoking costs the Canadian health care system approximately $3.5 billion
every year.
    The primary goal of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy (FTCS) is to reduce disease and death among Canadians. It recognizes that the key to success is comprehensive, integrated and sustained action, carried out in collaboration with all partners and directed at Canadians of all ages. Federal, provincial and territorial Ministers of Health are committed to working together to reduce tobacco consumption in Canada.
    Health Canada has resources available to help workplaces go smoke-free, including "Smoke-free Public Places: You Can Get There" and "Towards a Healthier Workplace: A Guidebook on Tobacco Control Policies". "Smoke-free Public Places" offers hands-on, easy-to-use resources to help municipalities and communities through the various stages of planning, implementing and evaluating non-smoking by-laws and policies in public places in their community. The "Guidebook" is designed to help employees and employers who are preparing to create or strengthen tobacco control policies in their workplace.
    These and other resources on second-hand smoke and help on how to quit smoking can be found at:
www.GoSmokefree.ca or by calling 1 800 O-Canada     (1 800-622-6232).
Egalement disponible en français
 
For further information: Media Inquiries:  Paul Duchesne, Health Canada, (613) 954-4807; Adèle Blanchard, Office of the Minister of Health, (613) 957-0200; Tricia Geddes, Office of the Minister of State (Public Health), (613) 941-8081; Public Inquiries: (613) 957-2991; Health Canada news
releases are available on the Internet at
http://media.health-canada.net
http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/January2005/01/c9474.html


Holiday spirit eluding Liberal government-ON
 
Wednesday December 29, 2004
Seaforth Huron Expositor — One must wonder if the Christmas spirit is eluding those in power this year as the provincial government conspicuously punts its cash cows while it simultaneously boosts taxes for everyone who dares to dwell under the Ontario sun.
It is of interest to note the province -- that consistently points to the $5.6-billion deficit from the previous Progressive Conservative-led government as the rationale for a dizzying array of odd initiatives -- is nonetheless willing and ready to allow Ontarians to bring their own wine into restaurants meaning less revenue for restaurateurs.
The government -- soon to be famously -- is also taking the chance on losing kazillions in tobacco tax revenue by rolling out plans for a province-wide smoking ban in public places effective 2006.
Not only will the move give a huge boost to the black market, it will also spell the end to a steady stream of tobacco tax revenue.
The province is also anti snack food, to the point where elementary schools can no longer house vending machines that carry such risqué items as chocolate bars laced with nougat.
What does this mean? Students must purchase candy off school grounds and school associations have fewer opportunities to make money for programs no longer covered by tax dollars.
Amusingly enough, the province is going to be reviewing the possibility of cutting back on the hours posted by gambling establishments.
This manoeuvre would lead to fewer jobs and a weakened economy.
Meanwhile, Ontarians are now paying a health-care premium and some property owners, including horse ranch and condo owners, are seeing their property reclassified as commercial and, therefore, face spiraling property tax hikes.
All told, the past year of Liberal leadership has led those who once sought a kinder, gentler Ontario to ask whatever happened to their best of intentions.
One must also wonder why the Liberals continue to focus on balancing the budget when the former government showed it could not be done at the current level of services, depleted though they were.
Perhaps instead of echoing the words of Tiny Tim with the plea, “please sir, can I have s’more?” Ontarians should ask the provincial government to meddle less.
Indeed, perhaps it is time for Dalton McGuinty’s crew to focus on drawing more jobs into the province rather than wringing out the last possible penny from the pockets of every working Joe and Jane in the land.
The Clinton News Record

http://www.seaforthhuronexpositor.com/index.php?id=591


Owners told to call police

Wed, June 2, 2004

SMOKERS WHO REFUSE TO GIVE ID CAN'T BE CHARGED

By KEVIN CONNOR, TORONTO SUN

THE CITY'S new smoking bylaw has no teeth and isn't being enforced, bar staff say. Bar and restaurant staff who phoned the city's new smoking inspectors' hotline to report the bylaw was being broken were told to call the police.

"I was told to treat someone smoking in my establishment like you would a drunk and call the police. This is par for the course. It's the city," Vic Salerno, owner of Upfront Bar and Grill, said yesterday after calling inspectors to say the bylaw was being broken in his pub.

The city has assigned eight bylaw inspectors to enforce the smoking prohibition, which went into effect at midnight on June 1.

Other inspectors are supposed to enforce the bylaw as part of their daily routine.

But they aren't responding to calls.

"If we find someone smoking, they don't have to give us any ID like they would for the police. We can't charge them if we don't know their name," said smoking bylaw inspector John Coleman.

REFUSAL TO DO THE JOB

"If people want something done to stop someone from smoking they will have to phone the police and, honestly, I don't know if they would come."

Cops will not be enforcing the municipal smoking bylaw, said Toronto Police spokesman Const. Kristine Bacharach.

"It's the bylaw officers' job to enforce this bylaw, which doesn't appear to be thought through," Bacharach said.

A person who illegally lights a smoke is liable to be fined $255 -- a $205 fine, plus a $50 victim surcharge for the first offence. Repeat offenders could face fines of up to $5,000.

"There already is a lot less smoking in bars. Some folks are thumbing their nose at us but we will get to them," said Joe Mihevc, chairman of the Toronto Board of Health.

"We need to find a balance without being heavy-handed and let people get their heads around this.

"The best bylaws happen with education. There is a curve here and we will meet the curve."

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/06/02/482650.html


Health boss kicks up storm -ON

BUSY YEAR FOR GEORGE

By ANTONELLA ARTUSO, QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU CHIEFSun, December 26, 2004

IN THE PROVINCIAL Liberal government's first year in office, no cabinet minister was under the media microscope more than "Furious" George Smitherman. The Ontario health minister was given the herculean task of taming a system where annual inflation runs upwards of 5%.

His enthusiastic efforts to transform the system eventually led to the NDP-imposed nickname "Furious" George for his rumoured tantrums with hospital execs.

"I see that people are characterizing me like a pit bull," Smitherman told reporters.

"I maintain that my bark is worse than my bite."

Smitherman suggested he was more "poodle" than pit bull. (A good thing since his government is ordering all pit bulls leashed and neutered.)

Smitherman's attempts to curb spending set off the province's hospital cleaners, who were not amused when he mused they could be paid less.

NOSE-TO-NOSE OVER DEAL

Hospital CEOs were told to balance their books, or else, and to stop building "Taj-ma hospitals."

The province's doctors went nose-to-nose with Smitherman over a derailed compensation deal.

He also suggested his coming provincewide smoking ban would take on private clubs and Legion halls, setting off smoker alarms across the province.

Finally, the health minister banned and then unbanned fresh sushi.

All in all, a busy year for the surprise standout in Premier Dalton McGuinty's cabinet.

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/12/26/797177-sun.html


All-out smoking ban believed excessive -ON

Regarding the letter, Expand smoking ban, (Dec. 26):

I have serious doubts whether J. M. Armstrong's point resonated with many of your newspaper's readers. Being a non-smoker myself, I believe my standpoint to be unbiased.

To refresh Armstrong's memory, the reason behind banning public consumption of beer or liquor is that alcohol is a controlled substance. As most people have seen others under the influence of alcohol behaving badly, this needs no further justification. Alcohol consumption in public leads to general disobedience, which can lead to riot.

I have yet to see any substantiated cases of disorderly conduct resulting from smoking tobacco.

I am wholeheartedly in support of smoke-free family restaurants, which children frequent. I feel that the smoke ban in relation to bars and taverns, and all pubic areas as suggested by Amstrong, is draconian and opens up the municipal, provincial and federal governments to another human rights debacle.

E. Kwan
Sarnia

London Free Press


Melfort hotel lays off workers, fears smoking ban will hurt business

Broadcast News December 29, 2004

MELFORT -- A co-owner of a hotel in Melfort fears the upcoming province-wide smoking ban could cut her business by 60 per cent.

Waneta Goldstein at the Chances R Hotel says she's giving early notice to two employees so they can take full advantage of their employment insurance.

Starting Jan. 1, smoking will be banned in all indoor public places, including restaurants and bars.

Goldstein says if business is better than expected, she'll rehire the two workers.

Lilian Campbell -- one of those facing a layoff -- says she understands the move by her employer, but finding a new job won't be easy at this time of year

http://www.canada.com/search/story.html?id=58a8d9c9-3523-438e-a7d8-2ac79247e021

 


Distributor doubts tobacco tax revenue estimates-OK

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) -- A Sapulpa tobacco wholesaler says revenue projections from Oklahoma's new tobacco tax are inflated because of several exception in tribal tobacco compacts.

Standard Distributing sales manager Rick Bahlinger says when states raise cigarette taxes, smokers tend to switch to Internet sales or tribal smoke shops.

But Governor Brad Henry's chief compact negotiator says officials considered those exceptions when figuring the impact of State Question 713.

State Finance Director Scott Meacham says many of the tribal exceptions will go away for tribes as soon as state officials and the Creek Nation agree on a new compact.

The Creeks are one of the state's major tribal sellers.

The new law that resulted in a net tax increase of 55 cents on a pack of cigarettes went into effect yesterday.

(Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

http://www.kokh25.com/uploads/local/oklahoma_ok/20d82718.shtml


Analyst predicts tobacco decision

A decision on whether the government can pursue $280million in damages from cigarette makers using federal racketeering laws could come this month, an analyst said.

Prudential's Robert Campagnino predicts the decision on whether the government can attempt to seize the profits in its ongoing trial will come Jan. 11.

Campagnino figures the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia for the past three months has been averaging 54 days between oral arguments and issuing its opinions. The arguments on the amount of damages were made Nov. 17, putting the date at Jan. 10, a Monday. But the court typically releases opinions on Tuesdays or Fridays, making the next day more likely.

The longest the court has taken to issue an opinion was 94 days, which would put the release date on Feb. 18.

The trial resumes Thursday after a holiday break. The Justice Department contends the industry engaged in a five-decade conspiracy to deceive the public about the health hazards of cigarettes.

http://www.courier-journal.com/business/news2005/01/02/D1-cool02-3248.html


Tobacco Tax -KS
AP
State lawmakers aren't very optimistic that the public will support increasing tobacco taxes to pay for expanded health care coverage. Governor Sebelius wants to raise 50 million dollars to provide health care to 30,000 poor adults and 40,000 children. It would also subsidize health insurance for low-paid workers. To pay for it, Sebelius wants to up the state's cigarette tax by 50 cents to a $1.29 per pack. It would also increase taxes on chewing tobacco and other products. But House budget committee chairman Melvin Neufeld, a Republican from Ingalls, rates the chances of a tobacco tax increase as ``zero.'' He and others say the November elections showed votersdon't want higher taxes.

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/1316536.html


Smoke ban sparks fear for swimmers

02jan05

SMOKERS yesterday were coming to terms with the new ban on lighting up in many public places, including between the flags on patrolled beaches.

But Surf Life Saving Queensland urged smokers not to stop swimming between the flags.

There was concern that people might mistakenly think they could not smoke anywhere on patrolled beaches.

The laws which came into effect yesterday prevent beachgoers from smoking only between the red and yellow flags – and 50m out to sea.

"We want to remind people that the flagged areas are the only place to swim," said Surf Life Saving Queensland operations manager Peter Dawes.

"We absolutely do not want to see people choosing to visit an unpatrolled location simply so they can smoke."

Queensland Cancer Fund manager of prevention and early detection, Susan Greenbank, said she believed most people were law-abiding citizens who would be happy to follow the rules.

"If it means moving outside the flags to have a cigarette, they will do that," Ms Greenbank said.

She did not find any smokers when she visited Main Beach at Southport on the Gold Coast yesterday, although there were plenty of cigarette butts in the sand.

She said that when all the new anti-smoking laws were implemented – by July 1 next year – they would have a huge impact on the health of Queenslanders.

The Queensland Cancer Fund conducted research on attitudes to the new laws and found that more than 70 per cent of people were in favour of the smoking restrictions.

As well as the between-the-flags ban on beaches, people now are not allowed to smoke within 10m of a playground; within 4m of an entrance to a commercial building; at artificial beaches including Brisbane's South Bank, Redcliffe and Cairns; in any major sports stadium; and in at least one-third of the indoor area of licensed premises.

http://www.thesundaymail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11830203%255E2765,00.html


The twenty issues of 2005 -SC

Posted on Sat, Jan. 01, 2005

SPURRIER AND USC:

Can Steve reach the heights that Lou failed to scale?

Football program in disrepair. Huge name with storied background lured to deliver big-time achievements. Frenzied fans counting down the minutes to opening day.

Yes, 1999 was a year to remember.

So much so that USC will do it all over again.

The Gamecocks have replaced one coaching legend with another, luring Steve Spurrier to Columbia to replace Lou Holtz.

Holtz accomplished much during his five seasons at USC but failed to reach the lofty heights so sought after by the school.

So Spurrier is in, and with him comes a freewheeling offensive style that will be a 180-degree turn from Holtz’s conservative — and that’s the nicest word we could think of — approach.

So the offense will be fun, as will Spurrier’s often sharp candor.

But will he win? Well, that’s the seven-year, $1.25-million-per-year-guaranteed question waiting to unfold.

RESEARCH PARK

USC revving up work on ‘economic engine’

Work is expected to begin in February on the Horizon Center, site of two five-story buildings that will anchor USC’s new research campus.

The buildings, about 125,000 square feet each, will sit along Blossom Street on the block bounded by Main, Wheat and Assembly streets. Developer Craig Davis hopes to open the buildings in the third quarter of 2006 at a cost of around $40 million.

Davis said he hopes to announce some business partners during the first half of this year. Meanwhile, USC president Andrew Sorensen continues to talk about a courtship with a Fortune 500 company.

Supporters of the research campus believe it will become an economic engine for South Carolina and its capital city. The 5 million-square-foot campus will consist of laboratory and office space, mixed-use retail, recreation areas and affordable housing, Sorensen said.

SANFORD’S FUTURE

Popular governor says he’ll seek term No. 2; the question is who will rise to challenge him.

Although Gov. Mark Sanford is only halfway through a four-year term, much of the 2005 political talk will center on his 2006 campaign for re-election.

Sanford, a Republican, has said he will seek a second term. As of July, he had more than $2 million in his campaign account. That, combined with his steady popularity among voters, is likely to scare off most challengers.

Democrats will field a candidate, but who it will be remains unknown. And, although unlikely, it is possible that a Republican will challenge Sanford in a primary.

Sanford remains vulnerable over his inability to guide legislative priorities through a Legislature controlled by Republicans.

This year, he has another ambitious agenda, including a major income tax cut and a plan to offer tax credits for parents to send their children to private schools or better public schools.

If neither passes, some of Sanford’s perceived invincibility could wear off.

U.S. SENATORS

Graham takes the spotlight as the 109th Congress convenes; DeMint’s key issues also at top of GOP list.

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is roaring into the 109th Congress, which convenes next week for a two-year run.

He is on the Sunday talk shows explaining his plan to reform Social Security. His editorials are printed in newspapers around the nation. He is on the front of those newspapers opining on changing how lawsuits are filed and on the war in Iraq.

Entering his third year in the Senate, the quick-tongued Graham has positioned himself as a conservative willing to buck the Bush administration publicly.

As for U.S. Sen.-elect Jim DeMint, R-S.C., his key issues — Social Security reform and tax reform — sit at the top of the GOP agenda for 2005 and 2006.

That may help the inherently quiet politician distinguish himself among his fellow freshmen. His first tasks, though, are to build a staff and open field offices across the state.

VILLAGE AT SANDHILL

The heart of the Northeast’s giant retail complex is expected to open this year, but questions remain about the market mix.

Over the next year, the 300-acre Village at Sandhill development in Northeast Richland will have staggered openings. The Town Center, the heart of the shopping complex, is expected to open in August.

The first businesses — Rhodes, Cost Plus World Market and Plex Indoor Sports — opened in November.

The 16-screen Eastern Federal Theater, a major tenant, hopes to open before the “Star Wars Episode III” debut May 19.

Town Center is expected to be home to a number of retailers entering the Columbia market for the first time.

Things to watch: Will Developer Alan Kahn get the upscale mix he hopes for, and will any established retailers relocate to the Village.

HOSPITAL GROWTH

Local medical facilities are investing millions in ambitious growth plans.

Columbia-area hospitals will continue their expansion plans this year.

A state hearing is expected in February on Providence Hospital Northeast’s plans to launch a $58 million expansion that will add 135,000 square feet of space and 50 acute-care beds. If approved, the expansion is expected to be completed in 2007.

In October or November, Lexington Medical Center is scheduled to complete a $145 million expansion. However, part of the project, a $5.6 million heart surgery unit — is being challenged by competing hospitals.

Palmetto Health will continue with its plans to spend up to $140.4 million to build Palmetto Health Baptist Parkridge, a full-service hospital with 84 beds near its new offices at I-26 and Lake Murray Boulevard. State approval of the project is pending.

Palmetto Health will continue building an $80 million heart hospital at the Palmetto Health Richland campus. That facility is under construction.

DOWNTOWN LIVING

A residential building boom will be changing the look of downtown in 2005.

Downtown Columbia residents can look forward to new neighbors as work continues in 2005 on these projects:

Developer Ben Arnold’s Renaissance Plaza project at nearby Lady and Pulaski streets is offering 17 live-work town houses priced from $375,000 to $450,000 and 60 condominiums priced from $180,000 to $350,000.

Another developer, Wade Caughman, promises to restore most of the dense trees and foliage he cut down on the stretch of the Three Rivers Greenway adjacent to Congaree Park, the 53-home upscale riverfront development he is building in West Columbia.

Caughman also is developing the historic Middleton Building, at the foot of the Gervais Street Bridge, and the surrounding 3.85 acres into 54 upscale residential town houses and condominiums called The City Club.

Housing is also likely for at least part of the Bull Street mental health property.

LEXINGTON COUNTY GROWTH

More houses, more headaches. Lexington County leaders will look for answers and consider one plan that would be the first of its kind in the state.

Lexington County, grappling with its rapid growth, could become the first South Carolina County to impose an impact fee on new homes and businesses, under a 1999 state law.

Lexington County Council is studying the issue as a way to pay for new infrastructure — such as the county’s $16 million Judicial Center, new roads or firehouses.

The county is one of the fastest-growing in the state, with more than 2,000 homes built most years. An impact fee — a fee added to the cost of new homes or businesses constructed in the county — could mean a property tax cut for current residents.

The biggest issue in deciding whether to impose an impact fee this spring, county leaders said, is determining which projects the law allows the fee to finance — which means the county may be lobbying for changes at the State House.

SCHOOL FUNDING

A ruling is likely in a decadelong school funding case that could have far-reaching implications for public education.

Look for a ruling with potentially sweeping implications for South Carolina schools sometime in mid-2005.

Judge Thomas W. Cooper Jr. heard closing arguments in the 16-month school funding trial in early December and has given both legal teams that argued the case a March 1 deadline to submit an outline of why he should rule in their favor.

An administrator who schedules trials before circuit court judges has promised Cooper he’ll be given extra time to review the court record and research rulings in similar cases elsewhere.

Eight rural school systems in eastern South Carolina are suing the Legislature in a dispute over how state government underwrites its share of the cost of providing a public education.

The lawsuit, which took a decade to get to trial, has raised fundamental questions about poverty, education reform and how the state pays for schools.

But whatever Cooper’s decision, it will be appealed to the state Supreme Court, attorneys on both sides and Cooper agree

FIXING THE NEIGHBORHOODS

Columbia shifts its focus to long-neglected in-town neighborhoods, a big-budget project with many questions and challenges.

The city of Columbia’s funding priorities slowly are shifting from the Congaree Vista to the redevelopment of long-neglected in-town neighborhoods.

This year, the city faces big decisions and is likely to earmark major money for such projects.

The East Central City Consortium has drafted a master plan for redeveloping five clusters of neighborhoods from Two Notch Road to Blossom Street east of Harden Street, plus Rosewood’s South Edisto Court neighborhood.

The city will have to work through regulatory barriers and find funding to begin implementing the plan. The first phase is estimated to cost $103 million.

Also, the city is planning to fund the creation of a master plan for land-use development in north Columbia. Finally, construction is under way on mixed-use developments where the former Saxon Homes and Hendley Homes subsidized housing projects were razed.

JOBS, JOBS, JOBS

South Carolina is expected to see a slightly higher job growth rate in 2005, as it struggles to fully climb out of a recession.

If job growth continues as expected in 2005, South Carolina may finally say goodbye to the last recession.

Total nonfarm jobs peaked at 1.9 million in June 2000, then fell to a low of 1.76 million in June 2002. Jobs have been growing slowly since; last year’s rate was just more than 1 percent, or about the rate of population growth.

USC economist Don Schunk predicts the number of jobs will increase 1.6 percent, enough to result in true growth.

South Carolina rang out 2004 with a rush of economic news. Vought Aircraft and Global Containment Systems announced plans to create hundreds of jobs in Charleston and Aiken, respectively. The Savannah River Site, meanwhile, said 2,000 workers could lose their jobs in the next two years, as the site winds down production of highly radioactive plutonium used in nuclear weapons.

S.C. MILITARY BASES

The state waits to hear about the future of its eight military installations.

The future of South Carolina’s eight military installations and the 121,000 jobs that depend on them will be known in May when the Defense Department’s budget-cutting ax falls.

Up to 30 percent of the nation’s military bases could be closed in the next round of shutdowns under the Base Realignment and Closure Act, or BRAC. Officials say that large number means no base is immune to threat of closure.

In the Midlands, business and government leaders are making their best cases to keep Fort Jackson, Shaw Air Force Base and McEntire Air National Guard Station open.

South Carolina lost an Air Force base in Myrtle Beach and a Navy base in Charleston to previous base closings.

TORT REFORM

Lawmakers are set to make big changes in whom you can sue, and how.

State lawmakers are likely to make big changes in where and how lawsuits are brought and how large damage awards can be.

Business leaders and many Republicans say the state’s laws are too friendly toward plaintiffs and bad for business.

Advocates for changing the law want to crack down on a plaintiff’s ability to “venue shop,” or file suit in a county where juries award large payouts.

They also want to limit the time in which a lawsuit can be filed and change the rules on who can be sued when more than one defendant is involved.

One bill, dubbed the “Business Protection Act” already has been filed. It is expected to fly through the House, but it could get bogged down in the Senate.

Still, the issue has more momentum this year than in the past.

TAX REFORM

The state still will be taking your tax money. It might just be doing it in a different way.

Taxes — and not just cutting them — again will be a hotly debated issue in the General Assembly this year.

Gov. Mark Sanford has made cutting the personal income tax a top priority. Lawmakers have their own ideas. Some examples:

A bill Sanford recently vetoed would have prevented local governments from raising property values more than 20 percent during reassessments. Expect a similar version to come up again.

Lawmakers also might try to revive the Quinn-Sheheen plan, which proposed raising the state sales tax while cutting property taxes. The plan lost some steam with the June primary defeat of House Majority Leader Rick Quinn, R-Richland.

An increase in the cigarette tax is a potential dark horse issue this session, with the state Chamber of Commerce supporting a hike to help small businesses pay for employee health care.

STATE BUDGET

The picture brightens for the state’s budget, but don’t expect a spending spree.

For the first time in five years, lawmakers aren’t feeling glum about the state budget forecast.

About $350 million more is expected for the 2005-06 fiscal year, which begins July 1, and there’s no shortage of opinions on how to spend some $6 billion.

Bolstering law enforcement, controlling state health costs and shoring up education funding are leading issues for Republicans and Democrats alike.

Gov. Mark Sanford’s executive budget, which details all state spending and proposes targeted cuts, should raise a few hackles in the General Assembly.

Lawmakers also may opt to face some unpleasant realities by setting aside money for cost-of-living adjustments for state retirees. The system likely will be stretched too thin by 2006 to keep doling them out.

So, while prospects for the next budget are not as gloomy as in recent years, don’t expect a spending spree. The state has plenty of catching up to do.

HEALTH CARE REFORM

Federal change could affect how the state provides health insurance for the poor, elderly and children.

Medicaid costs, the fastest growing part of the $6 billion state budget, will be a dominant issue in the Legislature.

Changes in the program — which provides health insurance for the poor, elderly and children — could come at the federal level, which would have an undetermined impact on the state.

Lawmakers will try to hold down costs and boost the reimbursement rates, while resisting tax hikes to pay for the program.

At the same time, the governor and lawmakers will take another run at saving money by restructuring state health agencies.

Their goal is to eliminate waste caused by duplication of services to patients, to eliminate certain boards and commissions and have the health agencies answer to a head appointed by the governor with the Legislature’s consent.

HOMELESSNESS

On the agenda for city and community leaders: gathering more accurate information about homelessness and trying to find a long-term solution.

A series of summit meetings on homelessness in the city of Columbia continues in January.

The most pressing need for service providers, along with city and county leaders, is to identify a permanent site for a homeless shelter.

The Beth and Lou Holtz Winter Shelter will remain at its Hampton Street location for another year, after its lease was extended in December. Officials say that bought them some time to find a solution, but the pressure is still high to develop a long-term plan.

The notion of a joint, one-stop homeless center still is at the forefront of the discussion, even though an effort by business leaders to develop such a facility on Shop Road encountered neighborhood opposition.

Also in January, the Midlands Area Consortium of the Homeless launches a count of the homeless to finally give leaders an accurate picture of the problem’s scope.

NORTHEAST CONGESTION

Some want Richland County to put the brakes on new construction while it figures out how to fix its overloaded roads. Will the idea fly?

Figuring out how to pay for widening ever-more congested roads is an issue awaiting Richland County planners and the County Council in 2005.

The issue of traffic congestion — most at the forefront in the Northeast, but growing in other areas as well — is reaching a head. Some have suggested a moratorium on new houses or businesses until a solution is found.

“Something has to be done,” said planning commissioner Norman Jackson, who pitched the idea of a moratorium. Traffic makes it hard for emergency vehicles to navigate and means long wait times for commuters, he said.

But some opponents have said a moratorium would drive up the cost of housing.

Enacting new fees or increasing existing ones to pay for the work is certain to be an unpopular idea with many residents.

Others, such as planning commissioner Barbara Wyatt, agree with a moratorium for a few months. But a long-term one would “cripple the economy in Richland County,” Wyatt said.

YOUTH VIOLENCE

Several high-profile shootings of teenagers galvanized the community in 2004. Leaders plan to continue several efforts in the coming year to try to tackle the problem.

Leaders in 2005 face the challenge of trying to curb youth violence, an issue spotlighted tragically last fall by two shootings that left three teens dead.

Columbia Mayor Bob Coble is pushing for a statewide gang summit early this year that would bring together local community leaders to discuss the issue of gangs and how best to combat them.

The Greater Columbia Community Relations Council, which holds monthly discussions on curbing youth violence, also has called for a summit.

Meanwhile, some are pushing for legislation. A prefiled bill focuses on the criminal activity of gangs. It seeks to define a gang member, a criminal gang and what constitutes gang activity. But some legal experts question whether that legislation is necessary, and point to constitutional questions.

STATE OF THE ARTS

Two key cultural institutions are rebounding, but the picture still includes challenges.

Two important cultural institutions began rebuilding in 2004, but both have more work to do.

Karen Brosius, who had worked for 20 years with the Philip Morris Co., took the helm of the troubled Columbia Museum of Art. The museum fired its last director after only 11 months and has had many budget shortfalls; important positions had been vacant.

After a year, the museum is in the black and all the positions have been filled. But Brosius will still have to put the museum on more solid financial ground, attract more visitors and increase the museum’s scholarly work.

Since he became director of the Cultural Council of Richland and Lexington Counties in May, Andy Witt has mended fences and improved the professionalism of the agency. The group once raised about $700,000 but is now raising less than half that.

Under Witt’s leadership the council is getting back to raising money and becoming a voice for all arts groups. This year will be a test of whether the council can get back on track.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/10541762.htm


Police seek male suspect in woman's attack, rape
Oakland Park -FL
A woman sipping coffee and smoking a cigarette on her patio early Friday morning was attacked, choked and raped by a man who is still on the loose, the Broward Sheriff's Office said.
The victim, 56, was following her normal routine about 6 a.m. at her home in the 800 block of West Oakland Park Boulevard, leading detectives to think the attack was planned in advance.
The attacker, described as a black man about 5-foot-7, 140 pounds dragged the victim upstairs and threatened to kill her if she called police. She called her daughter, who called the Sheriff's Office.
Anyone with information can call Crime Stoppers at 954-493-8477, and could be eligible for a cash reward.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-c3bdig01jan01,0,241661.story?coll=sfla-news-broward


Big and Little Tobacco expected to fight over legislation -VA

RICHMOND, Va. Big and Little Tobacco are likely to fight again during the 2005 General Assembly session that convenes this Thursday.

At issue is upcoming legislation that attempts to close a so-called loophole in the industry's 1998 Master Settlement Agreement with the states.

Major tobacco players passed on the costs of this settlement to smokers by raising cigarette prices.

 Jan 2, 2004But to keep non-participating manufacturers from getting a price advantage -- the states demanded they make payments into escrow accounts.

 Those funds would also be used to cover future claims. If unused, they would be refunded in 25 years.

The states and the tobacco giants say the gap in the agreement permits small companies that only do business in a few states to get back some money almost immediately.

Smaller companies say Big Tobacco is trying to stifle competition.

http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=2754752


Lighters banned on U.S. airliners-US
'Intelligence Reform' legislation could
even lead to prohibition on matches

Posted: January 1, 2005
7:00 p.m. Eastern

Smoking between flights is about to get a little more difficult.

Starting next month, the Homeland Security Department is banning all cigarette lighters beyond airport checkpoints.

The new prohibition takes effect Feb. 15, but don't be surprised if you get stopped before then, say Transportation Security Administration officials.

The ban was mandated by Congress in the massive and controversial Intelligence Reform Bill – a gigantic piece of legislation not read by a single member of the House or Senate before it was passed last month and signed into law by President Bush.

For smokers, the news could get even worse. The TSA is also considering banning matches on flights. No decision has been made, according to one TSA official who spoke on condition of anonymity. But if a ban is enacted, it isn't clear how screeners would detect matches, short of a time-consuming physical search.

Some question how effectively a ban on lighters, and particularly on matches, could be implemented.

"In some cases it may be difficult to enforce," said David Stempler, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Air Travelers Association. "Many won't show up on X-rays."

Some airports – Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta and Denver, for example – have smoking lounges or areas that could be equipped with lighters similar to car lighters, Stempler said.

But more likely is that airport areas beyond the security checkpoints will become de facto non-smoking zones, officials said. Some airports, including Dallas/Fort Worth, ban smoking everywhere inside the terminals.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42205


Tillery's new suit is obscene

Sunday, January 02, 2005

To the editor:

First, thank you for your excellent, informative and unbiased news articles.

However, why am I not surprised that the infamous Madison County, Ill. is in the news again? This new lawsuit (Tillery's firm sues big tobacco again, Dec. 29) is obscene and would be an insult to any court system in our country. I wonder if the Kruegers and their attorneys can be sued for filing a frivolous lawsuit a second time, after requesting the case be dismissed "without prejudice" the first time?

I wonder how Rebekah Krueger can live with herself, knowing that she is using her husband's illness in such a despicable manner?

Consumers (to the best of my knowledge) still voluntarily make their own choices when they make retail purchases. I have not learned of any lawsuits against the Food and Drug Administration, food manufacturers and retailers for selling "low fat" products under false pretenses for more than 20 years.

Were these small convenience store chains even in business 24 years prior to 2000? Did Salem Lights exist in 1976? I am also curious as to what brand of cigarettes Gerald Krueger now smokes and where his cigarettes are now purchased. I doubt if he has quit smoking voluntarily after so many years.

Garnet Dawn
The Smoker's Club, Inc.

http://www.madisonrecord.com/arguments/argumentsview.asp?c=137683


Tillery's firm sues big tobacco again

By Steve Gonzalez - Edwardsville Bureau Wednesday, December 29, 2004

 Represented by trial attorney giants Korein Tillery of Belleville and SimmonsCooper of East Alton, a Nashville, Ill. couple filed a 12-count lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds (RJR) and Huck's Convenience Store in Madison County Circuit Court Dec. 28 for misrepresenting the amount of tar and nicotine contained in Salem Lights.

Gerald Krueger was diagnosed with lung cancer on Dec. 6, 2000, which he claims was caused by smoking 20-30 Salem Lights a day for more than 24 years.

He didn't know that he was receiving higher levels of tar and nicotine than RJR represented or that the smoke produced by Salem Lights is more mutagenic than regular cigarettes, Krueger claims.

Gerald’s wife, Rebekah Krueger, is also seeking damages alleging she has suffered “loss of the consortium, society, companionship, fellowship and other valuable services of her husband” since he has been diagnosed with cancer.

The Kruegers are seeking at least $600,000 in damages caused by RJR's and Huck’s alleged violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, the Uniform Commercial Code, product liability and negligence.

According to the complaint, the first day Huck’s placed Salem Lights cigarettes into the stream of commerce, Hucks individually and jointly engaged in misrepresentations, unlawful schemes and courses of conduct that induced Krueger to purchase Salem Lights trough unfair and deceptive acts.

“Krueger would not have purchased Salem Lights but for defendant’s unfair and deceptive acts and practices,” the complaint states.

As a result of the alleged unfair practices and acts, Krueger alleges he did not receive lower tar and nicotine cigarettes when he purchased Salem Lights and the defendants allegedly violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, which Krueger claims led to his lung cancer.

Krueger claims he relied upon the implied warranty that Salem Lights were merchantable; however Huck’s allegedly breached the implied warranty in that they were not merchantable.

Rebekah Krueger also claims she is informed and believes that she is entitled to actual damages against Huck’s by reason of loss of consortium and society.

Gerald Krueger filed a lawsuit against RJR, Huck’s, Park N Shop supermarkets and Hit & Run in December 2003, but asked for the case to be dismissed without prejudice.

http://www.madisonrecord.com/news/newsview.asp?c=137478


Dole enters next session more comfortable in the spotlight
Jan 2, 2005 12:40 PM
GREENSBORO, N.C. -- U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole, already a celebrity when elected in 2002, spent most of her first two years in office learning protocol and addressing constituents' needs without fanfare.

But as the November election neared, the Salisbury native hit the campaign circuit from Alaska to Florida, turning up her personal wattage for fellow Republicans ranging from the rank and file to the commander in chief.

This week she becomes North Carolina's senior senator. Dole also assumes a more prominent role on the national stage, heading the effort to elect GOP senators in 2006 as chairwoman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

"I did it because I felt it would be good for the state, and, you know, there are just times when something opens up, and step by step you get more involved," said Dole, 68. "It was not at all some sort of plan, you know, to go from here to there."

With mixed success, Dole plugged away at campaign promises to win full recognition for the Lumbee Indians and to end a Depression-era tobacco quota system.

Opponents argued her Lumbee bill would lead to the tribe opening casinos on Interstate 95, stalling the legislation. Dole said she will continue to press for Lumbee recognition.

In October, Congress approved a $10.1 billion buyout of the Depression-era price support system for tobacco farmers.

"We knew because of her high national profile she'd be a show horse for North Carolina," said Larry Wooten, president of N.C. Farm Bureau. "We didn't know what kind of a workhorse she would be."

Ferrel Guillory, director of the Program on Southern Politics, Media and Public Life at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said Dole's emergence as a partisan leader is no no surprise for someone with her stature and interest in expanding the GOP.

She served in the cabinets of two Republican administrations and is married to one of the party's former presidential nominees, former U.S. Sen. Bob Dole.

"She is dedicated to building and preserving Republican power on the national level," Guillory said, "and that's what she's been doing."

Dole said she would limit travel associated with the senatorial committee role to weekends and congressional breaks to avoid missing votes. That decision comes after Republicans harped on outgoing Democratic Sen. John Edwards for skipping votes to seek the presidency, and Democrats appear ready to hold Dole similarly accountable.

"Let's hope her new national party position will not distract her from issues important to the North Carolina voters who elected her," said Schorr Johnson, a state Democratic Party spokesman.

The Bush administration tapped Dole to run for the Senate post that Republican Jesse Helms was vacating in 2002.

She has largely remained loyal to the administration, backing $330 billion in federal tax cuts, $87 billion for operations in post-invasion Iraq and a parliamentary move that indicated her support for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriages.

Dole differed with the White House's support for relaxing media ownership rules, removing trade barriers with Singapore and permitting an inventory of oil and gas reserves that could lead to drilling off the Outer Banks.

---

Information from: News & Record, http://www.news-record.com

http://newsobserver.com/news/ncwire_news/story/1979477p-8357868c.html


Scott + Scott, LLC's Connecticut Office Files Securities Class Action Against Pfizer in Connecticut Federal District Court - PFE

Lawsuit Filed Soon After Scott's Filing of Merck Case

COLCHESTER, Conn., Dec. 31, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Scott + Scott, LLC (e-mail: nrothstein@scott-scott.com), has filed a class action lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE:PFE) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf of those who purchased or acquired Pfizer, Inc. securities from October 31, 2000 to December 16, 2004 (the "Class Period"). The lawsuit against Pfizer alleges the Company violated the federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading statements during the Class Period. New prescriptions for Pfizer's pain killer Celebrex(r), the leader in a class of drugs called cox-2 inhibitors, plummeted 56% last week just after a federal study found a link between Celebrex(r) and a heightened risk of heart attacks and strokes. Thi


Posted at 11:30 am by looped_ca
Make a comment

Friday, December 31, 2004
What was Said 2

Apple Valley, Rosemount legislators discuss upcoming session -MN
By Erica Christoffer Sun Newspapers (Created 12/30/2004 3:48:11 PM)

A projected $700 million deficit, K-12 funding, a bonding bill and transportation are only a few of the issues the legislators from Apple Valley and Rosemount will address during the upcoming 2005 state legislative session.

The representation has changed slightly, however, since last year. Sen. Chris Gerlach, R, will begin his first session in the Senate representing District 37, which serves Apple Valley and Burnsville. Gerlach won a special election this past summer to fill the remaining two years of the term vacated by Dave Knutson.

Rep. Lloyd Cybart, R, now represents House District 37A, defeating Shelly Madore, DFL, to win his first term in office. The seat formerly belonged to Gerlach.

And long-time legislator Rep. Dennis Ozment, R, will begin his 11th term representing residents in Rosemount and Apple Valley House District 37B.

As the session gets underway Jan. 4, local legislators are also expected to discuss a statewide smoking ban, health care and environmental issues.

Sen. Chris Gerlach

Passing the Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit is Gerlach’s top priority for his district. Last year, $10 million was dedicated for the project in the bonding bill that passed in the House but failed in the Senate.

“We’re getting short changed from MnDOT and the Met Council in the Dakota County area,” Gerlach said. “We’re only getting 34 cents on the dollar from our gas tax contributions as well.”

As far as light rail, Gerlach said it is too expensive and requires too many subsidies.

“It seems to be more about local economic development than it does moving people from point A to point B,” Gerlach said. “Bus lines seem to be about a fourth of the cost and they’re flexible in that you can change routes and you can change them to meet changing demographic patterns.”

Gerlach opposes a gas tax increase under the current distribution formula, which puts Dakota County as one of 11 counties that pays more than it receives.

“We need to equalize that out a little bit,” Gerlach said. “The money is not going to where it’s needed.”

Gerlach said he would not support a state-enacted smoking ban because he said the issue will take care of itself though the free market.

“More and more restaurants and establishments are going smoke free because they find that in the marketplace, their customers demand it,” Gerlach said. “We don’t have to have the government jump in on everything and dictate it. Let’s let it follow its natural course and you’ll find more and more smoke-free places over time.”

On health care, Gerlach said he expects legislation regarding federal conformity with the health savings accounts.

“We have to start here and that’s going to help kick-start the health savings account market,” he said.

Gerlach also foresees a proposal to reduce tax assessments on small businesses for health care by raising the cigarette tax. It will mean lower premium costs for employers and employees. However, Gerlach said he is undecided on the issue.

In terms of funding for K-12 education, Gerlach said he would support an increase.

“I don’t intend on raising taxes. I think there’s enough wiggle room left in the budget. It’s just a question of the decisions we have to make,’’ he said. “The goal is to achieve that inflationary increase.”

Gerlach said the budget for Health and Human Services is projected to increase by 20 percent. He said he hopes for less of an increase to cover costs in education as well as the projected deficit.

“You can’t take the compassion out of it,” Gerlach said. Health and Human Services needs to serve those who truly need the safety net, he said, as well as connecting people with their health care decisions and the costs and bring competition into the health care marketplace.

Gerlach called the projected deficit of $700 million “manageable.”

As for the bonding bill and the Minnesota Zoo’s request for exhibit expansion funds, Gerlach said he supports reviving the state institution.

“It’s time now for the Legislature to step up and fulfill their obligation and make sure that the zoo has what it needs to be successful,” Gerlach said. “I don’t know what the exact dollar amount will be, but I’ll be supportive of whatever the governor comes forth with.”

Last year the zoo requested $68 million from the state and Gov. Tim Pawlenty proposed a dedication of $34 million. However, because the bonding bill never passed, the zoo didn’t see any appropriation.

The thread that runs through all the various topics this year is “we have to get the job done,” Gerlach said. “I’m excited about it. I’m coming at this stuff from a whole different angle now.”

Sen. Chris Gerlach can be reached at 651-296-4120 or 952-432-4100 or by e-mail at sen.chris.gerlach@senate.mn.

Rep. Lloyd Cybart

While door knocking during his campaign this fall, Cybart said one of the most common comments he heard regarded the gridlock last year in the Legislature.

The freshman representative hopes to move issues forward in the House while representing his district during the 2005 session.

One issue he hopes to address is the bonding bill. Cybart said he supports the $34 million the governor had earmarked for the Minnesota Zoo’s exhibit expansion.

“I’m sure it will be along the same lines,” Cybart said.

As far as a smoking ban, Cybart said he supports local control rather than the state taking on the issue.

Health care is also going to be a huge issue this session, Cybart said, “with the runaway costs, something has to be done.”

Ideas he foresees being discussed are health savings accounts, tort reform and curbing state expenses, specifically in Health and Human Services and its anticipated 20 percent budget increase, he said. That increase will need to be dealt with to keep deficit spending down, Cybart said.

On the issue of a gas tax increase, Cybart said he would not support it under the current distribution formula.

“It’s a lop-sided formula, the rural areas get more than the suburban areas,” Cybart said. “If we raise the gas tax it’s still a disproportionate amount of the taxes coming back to Dakota County to fix our problems.”

Cybart’s top priority in transportation is the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along Cedar Avenue as well as similar transit options along the Interstate 35W corridor in Burnsville to alleviate congestion and bottlenecks into the cities. Last year, $10 million was dedicated to BRT in the House’s bonding bill, funds Cybart hopes to secure this year.

In terms of K-12 education funding, Cybart said he supports increasing appropriations.

“I don’t think that can be held flat for another two years,” he said.

To deal with the projected $700 million deficit, Cybart said he supports a combination of using reserve funds and finding alternative ways of expanding the state’s tax base.

“For this coming budget, I don’t see us raising taxes to fix that,” Cybart said. “I don’t think it’s as dire a situation as some people make it out to be.”

“I’m excited to get started,” Cybart said. “The reason I wanted to do this is materializing before my eyes, and that’s to make a difference and to serve my fellow man.”

Rep. Lloyd Cybart can be reached at 651-296-5506 or 952-454-3175 or by e-mail at rep.lloyd.cybart@house.mn.

Rep. Dennis Ozment

As the chair of the Environment and Natural Resources Finance Committee last session, Ozment said he plans to continue his work on the state’s priorities in terms of funding in those areas this year.

Ozment will also work on the Impaired Waters Program, a federal mandate in which states have to identify pollutants within its bodies of water.

“We now have to start putting together a plan of action on how we’re going to deal with those impairments and clean up our water,” Ozment said. “And, if we do not do that, the federal government threatens to put sanctions on the state of Minnesota.”

Ozment said the entire state has an obligation to deal with the water quality issues. The program will need funding from the Legislature this year and Ozment said his committee is drafting a bill for the state to eliminate those pollution problems as cost efficiently as possible.

“As long as we’re making adequate progress, we’re doing OK,” Ozment said, however, the state does not have long-term funding sources for the program. “We know that if we don’t deal with it aggressively, the time is kind of running out. I think that it can be done.”

Rather then a smoking ban, Ozment supports improving indoor air quality levels through establishing standards for the air rather then going after specific causes.

“Then the owner of the property can decide as to how they’re going to improve the air in order to meet the standard,” he said. “I don’t think we should be picking out one pollutant and think that it somehow will resolve the air quality problem. Let’s measure the air quality and improvement regardless of what’s contaminating it.”

Ozment said that health care will be a major issue in 2005 and he will be eager to hear what proposals come out of the Health and Human Services Committee.

“I do know we have to get the cost of health care under control,” Ozment said. “It’s the biggest driver right now of what’s happening with our state budget. It’s eating up the money faster than the economy is actually growing.”

Ozment said he would support a gas tax increase only if there was a change in the distribution formula.

“Right now a gas tax increase would enrich the dollars that are going to rural Minnesota inappropriately and it would not help us in the metropolitan area at all,” he said. “The system is broken in my opinion.”

His transportation priorities focus on securing funds for the Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit. The dedicated roads would improve mass transit and assist transportation needs in the south suburban area, he said.

By achieving rapid busing to the Mall of America, Ozment said that riders then could take advantage of the light rail system.

Ozment said he does support an increase in funding to K-12 education and would seek funds within the existing state dollars first.

“Education should be funded by the state of Minnesota and local [operating] levies should not be necessary,” Ozment said. “Our constitution says the state of Minnesota is supposed to be setting up a public education system that has equal opportunities all across the state.”

Ozment is championing the Minnesota Zoo’s request in the bonding bill, for the full amount of $68 million.

“I’m hopeful that we can get full funding for their needs so that we can get that state agency really living up to its full potential,” Ozment said. “It needs a significant upgrade to remain competitive.”

Rep. Dennis Ozment can be reached at 651-296-4306 or 651-423-1331 or by e-mail at rep.dennis.ozment@house.mn.

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Apple_Valley&story=149839

 

* 4 MORE ARTICLES FOUND ON CANDIDATES USING "SMOKING" BY SUN PAPERS

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Plymouth&story=150032

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Burnsville&story=149878

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Long_Lake&story=150079

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Minnetonka&story=150008

 


Report on CPS to call for big changes-TX
12/30/2004 12:34 PM
By: Associated Press

SAN ANTONIO -- A legislative report soon to be released reportedly will call for "sweeping and systemic" changes in how the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services operates.

As chairman of the state House Human Services Committee, state Rep. Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio, ordered the comprehensive investigation after a series of deaths of children under the supervision of Child Protective Services.

Uresti told WOAI Radio in San Antonio that among the sweeping changes will be in how caseworkers are trained. It also calls for dramatic funding increases for the Department of Family and Protective Services, higher pay for caseworkers and reduced caseloads for individual caseworkers.

The report could be released as soon as Thursday, Uresti said. Last month, he filed legislation calling for a $1-a-pack increase in the state cigarette tax to pay for CPS improvements, but even that won't be enough to meet the changes needed, Uresti said.

http://www.news8austin.com/content/headlines/?ArID=128035&SecID=2

 


Pub nights out will go up in smoke
PATRICK BROWN

FOR most of us, the festive season means one thing - a lot of parties. Be it the office annual bash or meeting up with friends for that once-a-year reunion, the evening usually ends up in the local pub where over a pint we solve the problems of the world and mark the passing of another year.

But this year may be the penultimate festive season when the evening down the local goes in the time-honoured Scottish fashion, because from spring 2006 the Scottish Executive has something else in mind - it wants to ban smoking in enclosed public spaces.

For better or worse, this will change the way we socialise in the 1000 pubs and clubs across Edinburgh. Indeed, earlier this month the Scottish Executive published its plans in the Smoking Bill which the Scottish Parliament is now consulting on.

In April of this year, a smoking ban came into effect in Ireland and already we have seen a major change in the way our Irish cousins have a night out. If you want to have a smoke then you can’t do that in the pub so you will head for the door and spend some time outside with a cigarette in one hand and a pint in the other, watching the world go by all from the comfort of the pavement.

If you are lucky then your local has a beer garden and you can nip outside to sit on a bench and hopefully have a patio heater to keep the cold at bay - who knows, you might even end up with singed eyebrows if your landlord has misjudged the heat level. There’s a new gag in Ireland that so many smokers now clutter up the pavements outside of the city’s pubs that if you want to have a breath of fresh air you have to go inside.

So does it really matter whether a smoking ban is introduced in Scotland? Well, for your local landlord it does. In the months that a smoking ban in Ireland has been in force a few worrying trends have emerged. The Irish Vintners Federation, which represents 6000 pubs across Ireland, has estimated that 4000 jobs have already been lost, with other studies showing that beer sales up until August have fallen by ten per cent across Ireland and by 14 per cent in Dublin.

SO what, I hear the average pub regular ask? Well the point is that for most pubs even a small drop in turnover can account for a big part of your profits - especially for those in cities where there is a lot of competition for trade - and a drop in those profits could be the difference between opening your doors or shutting up shop for good.

The pub regulars could find themselves without their local, never mind on the pavement, if the Scottish Executive gets its way and introduces a smoking ban in just 15 months.

The licensed trade in Scotland supports the Scottish Executive’s aim of introducing more smoke-free areas in Scotland but we don’t support a total smoking ban in 15 months. Neither, it seems, does the Scottish public, with just 13 per cent supporting a total smoking ban in pubs and clubs.

In our submission to the Scottish Executive’s Consultation on Smoking in Public Places, we put forward proposals which in three years would have resulted in 50 per cent of the total floor space in Scotland’s pub and clubs being non-smoking, would have banned smoking at the bar in all licensed premises and would have banned smoking in all areas where hot food was being served.

The industry didn’t underestimate the challenge it would face to implement these measures in licensed premises in Scotland. We proposed them as a means of taking forward the Scottish Executive’s objective of reducing smoking in licensed premises, giving our customers a choice of a non-smoking environment, whilst managing the economic and social impact of any change in licensed premises.

Unfortunately, the Scottish Executive has so far rejected our plan and look set to proceed with its proposal for a smoking ban in enclosed public places. If the situation in Ireland is repeated, we estimate that a smoking ban in Scotland will cost the beer and pub industry tens of millions of pounds and cost thousands of jobs, hitting traditional pubs in Scotland’s cities and rural areas hardest and tearing the heart out of communities across Scotland.

THE pubs and clubs along Edinburgh’s best-known streets in the city centre, like George Street, will be better positioned than most to meet the challenge, but Edinburgh also boasts unique community pubs based only a bus ride away from the city centre, and it is in those outlying areas where businesses will suffer most.

Since the Scottish Executive’s announcement in November of its smoking ban plans, the UK Secretary of State for Health, John Reid - ironically a Scottish MP - announced proposals for tackling smoking in pubs and clubs in England and Wales which stopped short of a total smoking ban. He got it right, the Scottish Executive hasn’t. The Scottish Beer and Pub Association supports the objective of introducing smoke-free areas, but we believe the Scottish Executive’s proposals are flawed, and have the potential to fundamentally damage Scotland’s hospitality industry, costing thousands of jobs and tens of millions of pounds.

We urge the Scottish Executive and the Scottish Parliament to think again before proceeding with the current proposals and to instead work with the industry to introduce the change we all want to see in a considered way.

If we fail in getting that extra time to take our customers with us towards smoke-free areas in pubs then next festive season will be the last Christmas without some member of the party having to nip outside at some point for a smoke.

Spending some time outside on the pavement will certainly add a new dimension to the traditional Edinburgh festive experience. Savour the traditional festive pub spirit this year, it could be one of your last.

• Patrick Browne is chief executive of the Scottish Beer and Pub Association

http://news.scotsman.com/opinion.cfm?id=1475432004

 


Pub cigs ban ends as profits dive  -UK

A pub landlord who banned smoking in his hostelry because its effects were damaging his eyesight has relented - after his profits took a dive.

Dave Diamond, of the Blue Bell Inn at Old Ellerby in East Yorkshire lifted the ban after only six weeks.

Mr Diamond had been warned by doctors at Hull's eye hospital that cigarette smoke was exacerbating a medical problem with his left eye.

"My eye's no worse than before", he told BBC News.

Regulars

"The staff at the hospital said cigarette smoke wasn't helping with my problem."

Regulars at the pub were told they would have to go outside for a cigarette, but after a few weeks the pub's takings had dropped by a third.

Although most of his customers accepted the ban a couple of 'passing trade' clients had balked at the move.

"Ours is a pub where people come for pint. It would be different if we were a foody pub."

"It wasn't easy to start with, although those who wanted to smoke went outside.

"We did have a problem with one or two who were passing customers."

Although the publican started out with the best of intentions, the financial realities of a self-imposed ban forced a rethink.

"After six weeks we realised...our takings were down by a third", said Mr Diamond.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/humber/4134377.stm

 


New Web Site Pinpoints Harmful Chemicals in Communities

December 3, 2004

National Library of Medicine
Robert Mehnert
Kathy Cravedi
(301) 496-6308  publicinfo@nlm.nih.gov

(Bethesda, Md.)--The National Library of Medicine (NLM), a part of the National Institutes of Health, announces an interactive Web site that shows--on maps--the amount and location of certain toxic chemicals released into the environment in the United States. The site, called TOXMAP, is free and no registration is required. The Web address is (http://toxmap.nlm.nih.gov).

TOXMAP focuses on the geographic distribution of chemical releases, their relative amounts, and their trends over time. This release data comes from industrial facilities around the United States, as reported annually to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). TOXMAP also links to NLM's extensive collection of toxicology and environmental health references, as well as to a rich resource of data on hazardous chemical substances in its TOXNET databases (http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/). There are also fact sheets and summaries about the various chemicals, written by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

For example, a family moving to a new city can locate facilities releasing toxic chemicals by entering the city's name and state, generating a map of facilities in that area. For each facility, information, including location and chemicals released, is provided. Information about the health effects of the specific chemicals identified is also provided.

Dr. Jack Snyder, NLM Associate Director for Specialized Information Services, said, "The National Library of Medicine has a special mission to address toxicology and environmental health needs. TOXMAP is part of this mission, and allows us to serve the public and professionals in a unique way. This Web site allows users to explore maps of what and where chemicals are released and by whom."

"In the last several years, the Library has created a number of Web sites with the consumer in mind," said NLM Director Dr. Donald A.B. Lindberg. "TOXMAP is a prime example. It joins Web resources for consumer health information broadly (MedlinePlus.gov), research studies (ClinicalTrials.gov), and older Americans (NIHSeniorHealth.gov)."

Located in Bethesda, Maryland, the National Library of Medicine, the world's largest library of the health sciences, is a component of the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/news/press_releases/toxmap_pr04.html



Posted at 4:55 pm by looped_ca
Make a comment

What was Said

Smokers' Helpline ready to kick butt
By DAHLIA LIWSZE, Sun MediaThu, December 30, 2004

Sometimes we need a kick in the butt -- literally. A recent study found nearly a third of Ontario smokers plan to make quitting their New Year's resolution. It's difficult, but not impossible.

"Just a few minutes of counselling ... or a little bit of support and assistance over the phone can improve someone's chances of quitting," said Paul McDonald, a professor of health studies at the University of Waterloo who helped start the Smokers' Helpline in 2000.

The helpline receives 8,000-9,000 calls a year from smokers and concerned family and friends in Ontario.

While half quit smoking on their first or second attempt, McDonald said those who fail should not be discouraged.

The Smokers' Helpline provides information, advice and support to help smokers quit and handle their cravings.

While she still has cravings, Debbie Chiniforoush, 43, plans to stay smoke-free. A smoker for 20 years, she hasn't lit up in 15 months.

"I noticed I was getting smoker's mouth, and that really bothered me a lot because I didn't want to look like a crocodile," she said from her Toronto home.

'NAGGED' BY SON

Another reason Chiniforoush quit was her 10-year-old son, who "nagged (her) to death," reminding her that smoking could kill her.

Realizing she needed support, Chiniforoush called the helpline. It and medication helped to make her third attempt at quitting successful.

McDonald said avoiding certain social situations can help to prevent a relapse.

He's optimistic about Ontario's new anti-smoking legislation. Research suggests restrictions increase motivation and the success rate for would-be quitters.

DRUGS, PATCH

While 18,900 Canadians died of lung cancer this year, the picture is not entirely grim. In 2003, 21% of Canadians aged 15 and up smoked, down from 2001.

There are many aids to help smokers quit -- pharmaceutical drugs, the patch, nicotine gum or natural herbal products like Butt Out (www.buttitout.com). * smoking rate still the same (quit rate of more the 6 months considered), with no "cessation aids".

"It basically comes from within," said Chiniforoush. "You have to want to do it. If you don't, then there's really no point."

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/OttawaSun/News/2004/12/30/801457-sun.html


Washington, D.C. The MTF survey reported a 7 percent decline in past month use of any illicit drug among 8th-, 10th- and 12-graders combined. However, among 8th-graders, lifetime use of inhalants, such as glue, shoe polish or gasoline, jumped from 15.8 percent in 2003 to 17.3 percent in 2004. Experts called for greater education about the risks of inhalants.

“We are concerned about the increasing number of 8th-graders using inhalants. Research has found that even a single session of repeated inhalant abuse can disrupt heart rhythms and cause death from cardiac arrest or lower oxygen levels enough to cause suffocation,” said NIDA Director Dr. Nora D. Volkow.

Inhalant use has been consistently highest among 8th-graders because it is inexpensive and easy to access, but it declined in use among students in all grades after an anti-inhalant media campaign was launched in 1995. The new upward trend led researchers to suggest that not enough teens understand the potentially fatal effects of inhalant use.

“The proportion of young people who believe it is dangerous to use inhalants has declined among both 8th- and 10th-graders over the past three years, which quite possibly explains the rebound in use,” said Dr. Lloyd Johnson, principal investigator of the study at the University of Michigan. “This turnaround in their use continues to suggest the need for greater attention to the dangers of inhalant use in our media messages and in-school prevention programs.”

The MTF survey also showed that teens continue to use alcohol at disturbing rates. For example, 29.2 percent of 12th-graders reported binge drinking in the last two weeks. Binge drinking is defined as having five or more drinks in a row. Lifetime use of alcohol was 43.9 percent for 8th-graders, 64.2 percent for 10th-graders and 76.8 percent of 12th-graders. High numbers of teens also continue to report using flavored alcoholic beverages, with an annual prevalence rate of 55.8 percent in 2004 and 55.2 percent in 2003. This was the second year that the MTF tracked the use of flavored alcoholic beverages.

Confirming the results of other studies, the MTF survey also showed continued abuse of prescription painkillers, such as Vicodin. In the past year, Vicodin was used by 9.3 percent of 12th-graders, 6.2 percent of 10th-graders and 2.5 percent of 8th-graders. While this was not a significant difference from 2003, officials say it is cause for concern.

Among the drugs reportedly declining in use is marijuana. According to the MTF survey, since the recent peak of marijuana use in 1996, there has been at least a 36 percent decline in the annual prevalence of marijuana use among 8th-graders, from 18.3 percent to 11.8 percent in 2004. Among 10th- and 12th-graders, there was a modest decline in marijuana use. There were also significant increases in the perception of harm from cigarette smoking among 8th- and 10th-graders.

NIDA will discuss the recent findings of the Monitoring the Future survey during a workshop held at CADCA’s National Leadership Forum on January 13. For more on the 2004 Monitoring the Future survey, visit http://monitoringthefuture.org.

http://cadca.org/CoalitionsOnline/article.asp?id=622


Run on tobacco reported in final days before tax -ID

MISSOULA -- Smokers are stocking up in the final days before a state tobacco tax takes effect, with dealers saying they're surprised by an apparent preference for the loose tobacco used in roll-your-own smokes.

"People are throwing the meat out of the freezer and throwing in tobacco," said Robert Lane, manager of Cigarettes Express in Missoula.

Lane said he recently sold one customer a 50-pound bag of tobacco. Bell Pipe and Tobacco Shoppe, also in Missoula, sold a man 24 cans of tobacco, said Betty Anderson, who runs the store with partner Mark Burgad.

Customers appear to be switching to loose tobacco to save money, said Anderson. A box of 200 filtered cigarette tubes, a bag of tobacco and a machine to make the cigarettes runs about $20 -- almost half the price of a carton of 200 manufactured cigarettes. And that carton's price will rise to almost $50 at the beginning of next year.

Other tobacco merchants such as Dorothy Clinkenbeard, who owns Joe's Smoke Ring in Evaro, said she expects customers to shop in neighboring states such as Idaho. Anderson and Burgad said they also expect a decrease in sales, but didn't think it would last.

"It's like gasoline," Burgad said. "How many times have you heard someone say, 'If gasoline goes above $2 a gallon I'm selling my car?"'

The voter-approved tobacco tax increase raises the tax on a pack of cigarettes to $1.70, the tax on an ounce of snuff to 85 cents and the tax on other tobacco products to 50 percent of wholesale. Money generated by the higher tax will be designated for health insurance programs, Medicaid services, veterans homes and the state's general fund.

http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?tl=1&display=rednews/2004/12/28/build/state/31-tobaccotax.inc


 Smokers stock up on cigarettes to avoid tax hike -AK
Juneau braces for bar-restaurant ban to take effect Jan. 2

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and JUNEAU EMPIRE December 30, 2004

Customers at Lucky Raven Tobacco in Soldotna are stocking up on cigarettes to avoid a state tax rate increase.

Smokers in Juneau are starting to migrate from restaurants with bars to plain old bars, to avoid a city ban on smoking in the former type of establishment, bartenders said.

Those two laws, one state and one local, will affect smokers in 2005. The state tax starts on New Year's Day. The smoking ban begins Jan. 2.

The tax hike is expected to generate an additional $20 million for the state. Gov. Frank Murkowski sponsored the legislation.

Jack Dean, cashier at Lucky Raven Tobacco, said customers are purchasing up to four times the amount of cigarettes they usually buy.

Mike Patterson, owner of Lucky Raven, said usually when tobacco taxes increase, it hurts businesses. He believes customers will find ways to avoid it, such as buying them online. He also expects a sales increase in cigarette rolling products and cigars, which are not affected by the tax.

 Patterson said he thinks this could lead to a decrease in tax revenue, which would be counterproductive.

A pack of cigarettes has been taxed by the state at $1 since October 1997. Lawmakers voted to gradually double the tax. A 60-cent tax hike on each pack of cigarettes will go into effect in January. The tax will go up 20 cents more in 2006 and another 20 cents in 2007.

Not everyone has heard of the tax hike. Mark Rackley, smoking outside Merchants Wharf in Juneau on Wednesday evening, said he didn't know about the increase but it wouldn't affect his use of cigarettes. Rackley said he smokes only occasionally.

Todd Maclay, a bartender at Hangar on the Wharf in Juneau, said he hasn't heard customers talking about the tax increase. But he has heard from customers who are looking for a place to drink and smoke.

A new Juneau ordinance bans smoking in restaurant bars, such as the Hangar. Eventually, in 2008, smoking will be prohibited in all of the city's bars.

"My regulars are starting to gravitate to places they can smoke," Maclay said Wednesday. "Nobody's quit smoking because of the smoking ban."

The Hangar's bartenders estimate that 40 percent to 50 percent of their regular customers smoke. Smokers aren't going to want to step outside and smoke in bad weather, he said.

Right now, the state takes in about $46 million each year from the tax, said Johanna Bales, program manager for tobacco tax for the state of Alaska. Seventy-six percent of the tax is earmarked for the school fund, which is dedicated to school construction. The rest goes to the state's general fund.

Department of Revenue officials said the last time the tobacco tax was raised in 1997, they lost about $7 million the first year due to stockpiling.

The entire amount of revenue generated from the increase will be for the state's general fund, she said. Almost 9 percent of that money will go toward the Tobacco Use Education and Cessation fund, which is designed to help smokers stop.

Bales said the state pays out about $125 million each year for smoking-related illnesses.

• Juneau Empire reporter Eric Fry contributed to this story.

http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/123004/loc_20041230003.shtml


Tobacco products fly off store shelves  -ID

Tobacco products are leaving store shelves in a hurry in anticipation of an increase in the state sales tax that begins with the new year.

"It's been a little crazy in here," said Tobacco Country manager Elizabeth Hall, saying customers who used to buy one or two cartons are now buying six at a time.

The voter-approved increase boosts the tax on a pack of cigarettes from 70 cents a pack to $1.70. That will put a pack of Marlboros, the most popular brand, at around $4.65 a pack, or around $45.75 for a 10-pack carton. The tax on an ounce of snuff is also going up to 85 cents.

Money generated by the higher tax will be designated for health insurance programs, Medicaid services, veterans homes and the state's general fund.

Bob Pribyl, co-owner of Tobacco Row, said there is some confusion about when the tax increase will take effect. While the tobacco stamps will switch over on Jan. 1, he is unsure whether 2004 tobacco stamps will be available at 2004 prices or at new 2005 prices. To solve the problem, he plans to sell his inventory down to the bare minimum, then switch to new prices as he restocks.

"I expect my shelves to be empty by the end of the week," he said.

Hall, manager of the two Tobacco Country stores at 895 Main St. and 1500 Broadwater Ave., said cigarettes have made special stocking stuffers this year.

"We're never open on Christmas Eve, but this year we were open and both stores raked it in. People were asking me if we gift wrapped," she said.

Pribyl, co-owner of Tobacco Row stores at 635 Wicks Lane and 2450 King Ave. W., senses something more sinister as a result of the tax increase.

"I know we're going to see a lot of black market activity," he said. "This is a concern of mine - people finding other means of getting their cigarettes."

In Missoula, dealers are surprised by an apparent preference for the loose tobacco used in roll-your-own smokes.

"People are throwing the meat out of the freezer and throwing in tobacco," said Robert Lane, manager of Cigarettes Express in Missoula.

Lane said he recently sold one customer a 50-pound bag of tobacco. Bell Pipe and Tobacco Shoppe, also in Missoula, sold a man 24 cans of tobacco, said Betty Anderson, who runs the store with partner Mark Burgad.

Customers appear to be switching to loose tobacco to save money, said Anderson. A box of 200 filtered cigarette tubes, a bag of tobacco and a machine to make the cigarettes runs about $20 - almost half the price of a carton of 200 manufactured cigarettes. And that carton's price will rise to almost $50 at the beginning of next year

http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2004/12/30/build/local/20-tax.inc


KCKPD arrest man on suspicion of theft -KS

By Melissa Shuman

Kansan Staff Writer

Christopher M. Rhodes, 20, was arrested on Kansas City, Kan. charges by the Kansas City, Kan. police Tuesday, said Capt. Ron Copeland of the Shawnee Police. No information on the KCK charges were made available from the KCKPD.

The Kansas City, Kan. man was also arrested on charges of stealing cartons of cigarettes in the Shawnee area.

Capt. Copeland said Rhodes is also charged with three thefts in Shawnee, three in Overland Park and one in Roland Park.

"This individual lives in Kansas City, Kan. and very likely has committed similar thefts over there," Copeland said. "I would suspect he was re-selling them or even trading them for drugs."

Copeland said Rhodes would enter a convenience store, walk behind the counter and pick up a few cartons of cigarettes and leave the store. Police believe the crimes were committed without the use of a weapon. Copeland also said although store clerks were usually present during the crimes, stores didn't stop the man - possibly for safety reasons. Cigarette carton thefts are not unusual, Copeland said, because some convenience stores do not lock up cigarettes, and because cartons are small and have a high value.

"The most recent theft was at Quick Trip in Shawnee," Copeland said. "There were two cartons stolen that were valued at $58 - usually in these thefts, they won't grab more than a few cartons."

Copeland said the best way convenience stores can stop the theft of cigarette cartons is to lock them in a case.

"It's a common crime," he said. "If they could just lock up the area where the cigarettes are, it would probably solve the whole problem."

http://www.kansascitykansan.com/articles/2004/12/30/news/local/news2.txt


Man Takes Smoke Break, Is Attacked -AL

The man tells police he was standing in a parking lot, smoking a cigarette when he was attacked.  He says 2 guys came up to him and asked for a smoke.  It happened outside A - Z Pawn Shop on Pratt Avenue in Huntsville on November 22nd.  The man claims one of the guys hit him in the head and the other one pulled a knife on him and tried to take his car keys.  Lucky for the man, his friend saw what was going on and chased the two guys away.  He then took his friend to the hospital to get treated.

Dial 53-CRIME if you can help lead police to the two men who did this.  You'll remain anonymous, and if your tip leads to an arrest, you could get up to $1,000.

http://www.waff.com/Global/story.asp?S=2730472&nav=0hBEUh7c


N.C. ruling could mean $100 million budget hole for Kentucky KY
The Associated Press
FRANKFORT, Ky. -- A North Carolina court ruling could make Kentucky responsible for paying more than $100 million in the current budget period to tobacco farmers, but the impact won't be clear for weeks, Gov. Ernie Fletcher's chief of staff said.

The possibility has created an obstacle for the governor's budget work, chief of staff Stan Cave said Wednesday.

"That ruling has been a setback to us in pulling this together, our ideas for the next budget," Cave said. "We're still analyzing the effect of it and how much money we may have to come up with."

The North Carolina judge released tobacco companies from making payments to farmers in Kentucky and 13 other states.

"The issue is that there is a state law that says the state has to make up the shortfall - if they are not made by the tobacco companies," Cave said.

The ruling has been appealed, however, by Kentucky and six other states. Because of that and because of other legal and policy questions raised by the order, Cave said it would be weeks before the issue is cleared up.

But he said an early analysis of the ruling showed the impact could be well over $100 million for the current budget period - which runs through June 30, 2006 - if the state must cover the loss.

The issue comes on top of other problems - including a $526 million shortfall in the Medicaid program - the governor and the legislature will face in balancing and passing a budget during the legislative session that will convene Tuesday.

The tobacco-related budget problem stems from a series of events that began in 1998 with the Master Settlement Agreement. Under that plan, tobacco companies agreed to make continuing payments - known as Phase I payments - to nearly all states to settle litigation over state costs to treat the health effects of smoking.

That was followed by another agreement by the companies to compensate tobacco farmers for losses they were expected to suffer under higher cigarette prices resulting from the Master Settlement Agreement. Those are known as Phase II payments.

After Congress approved a $10.1 billion buyout of tobacco quota holders last fall, the cigarette companies argued they were no longer obliged to make a final $189 million Phase II payment this month to farmers in 14 tobacco-growing states. The buyout ends these payments.

The North Carolina judge agreed and ruled last week that the companies should get a refund of payments made earlier this year.

The Kentucky law specifies that if the annual payments from tobacco companies to farmers fall short of $114 million, then the state will pay the difference out of half of the proceeds it gets each year under the Master Settlement Agreement. Those proceeds are placed in the Agricultural Development Fund for grants to help farmers diversify their crops.

The immediate problem, if the court ruling stands, is that there is not enough money in the development fund to cover an obligation of $114 million. The fund gets from $50 million to $55 million a year and the money it has is committed, said Michael Plumley, an assistant attorney general in Kentucky.

Keith Rogers, executive director of the Gov.'s Office of Agricultural Policy that oversees Kentucky's share of Master Settlement money, said he believes the law was intended to cover a small Phase II shortfall and not a situation in which an annual payment was not made at all.

"The General Assembly knew there would never be $114 million in the development fund in any given year," Rogers said. "There would not ever be that kind of money coming into that fund. So therefore you have to assume that they did not intend for the state to make that full Phase II payment should one ever be made.

http://newsobserver.com/news/ncwire_news/story/1972514p-8346897c.html


Michel expects quick action from legislators  -MN
By James Zwilling  Sun Newspapers (Created 12/30/2004

With a projected state budget deficit of $700 million that tops $1 billion with inflation built in, Edina’s legislators said they can’t afford not to fix the problem during 2005 legislative session.

The city’s three elected Republicans recently shared their goals for the upcoming session with the Sun-Current.

Rep. Ron Erhardt

Rep. Ron Erhardt, R-41A, said legislators have no other option than making the state’s budget deficit their top priority.

“Everyone’s top goal has to be to satisfy the budget,” he said. “We won’t know until February exactly what we’re working on, but right now the figure is over $1 billion with inflation.”

Erhardt said the state’s legislators disappointed the public in 2004.

“People were definitely upset,” he said. “We’re going to have to see a little more horse trading this year if we expect to get things done.”

Erhardt said he believes the state Senate has more incentive to negotiate this year and that Gov. Tim Pawlenty is anxious to see some results from the state’s legislators.

One area he hopes to see dramatic changes is in transportation funding, he said.

Erhardt, who serves as the chairman of the House Transportation Policy Committee, said he expects a major transportation plan to include bonding but also other increases working along with it such as a gas tax increase, which he said he would support.

“It looks like all of the plans that are coming forward are calling for some type of increase,” he said. “The problem is that the position that the governor and others have taken about no new taxes is a wall that doesn’t seem to be bending.”

Erhardt did not sign the “No New Taxes Pledge” in 2004.

Erhardt said there is too much that needs to be done for transportation in the state including additional lanes and some reconstruction in the metro area, rebuilding of roads in the rural areas of the state and more transit options.

“We need to fix roads and bridges and add lanes,” he said. “But when it comes down to it, transit gets people off the roads.”

Erhardt said light rail has performed successfully and attracted riders, but he said that no such transit system in the United States pays for itself.

He said bus ridership from the suburbs continues its success, so he hopes to see more of that in any future transportation plans.

Erhardt said legislators can also no longer afford to ignore school districts’ financial burdens.

He said he would support lifting the freeze on per pupil spending and throwing local control to the districts to levy for more money, provided they turn to the voters first.

Erhardt said health care will also remain a top priority for the state’s legislators.

He would like to see the 2 percent provider tax, sometimes called the “Sick Tax” done away with.

The tax affects all health-care providers in the state, who in turn, charge their patients.

“The funding is misplaced,” Erhardt said. “It falls on the shoulders of the sick and limits the access of the low-income residents.”

He said the tax could be replaced by increasing the cigarette tax.

Also on the topic of smoking, Erhardt said he would support a statewide smoking ban.

“There needs to be something uniform,” he said. “But I think it will involve enforcement being left up to local authorities.”

Rep. Neil Peterson

Neil Peterson, R-41B, the newly minted state representative from Bloomington, calls himself the “new kid on the block” and declared his first priority of the 2005 session is to become familiar with the processes and ways of getting things done at the Capital.

“My top goal in this session is just to learn; learn what’s going on and who the players are,” said Peterson. “I want to pick a spot … where I can use my background and experience.

“Part of that is just keeping your eyes open and your mouth shut,” he added. “I think there’s a lot of people over there that do just the opposite.”

The legislators don’t know their committee assignments yet but Peterson hopes to land a seat “where the action is.”

He noted that the GOP majority will be smaller in 2005 – 68-66 over the DFL Party – and suggested bipartisan efforts will be a higher priority.

“It appears to me that because of the change in the majority in the house, all the committees have to be re-balanced,” said Peterson, who claimed the District 41B seat in November. The seat was vacant after the Republican incumbent, Alice Seagren, was named state education commissioner by Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

Peterson said he hopes to gain posts on committees that can use his experience, but since he has no seniority may not get all he hopes for.

“On my list I had Local Government and Higher Education Finance,” Peterson said. “These are both areas where I have had considerable of exposure.”

Transportation issues will be among those that dominate the session, Peterson said.

“The big issue that I heard of during the campaign is this transportation gridlock,” Peterson said.

Peterson also said the Legislature’s failure to pass a bonding bill in the last session was “unconscionable.”

He said the state’s finance system is too complex.

“I have over the last couple months studied the whole budget thing and I think I’m beginning to understand the substantive parts of it.

“The approach to this ought to be ‘SIBKIS – see it big, keep it simple.’

“That’s where I’m going to start in everything I do there,” Peterson said.

“Education finance is another huge issue,” Peterson said. “It’s an enormous issue.

“The whole system made an extremely bad decision when they changed the whole funding system during the [Jesse] Ventura administration.”

The effect has been to lessen the power of local school districts, Peterson said.

“The people who were there at the time may not want to admit it was a dumb decision. The people who are new don’t own it and don’t understand it.”

Peterson said he believes money for schools must be increased.

“Everybody agrees it ain’t enough,” he said. “They made a quantum leap change and it was a wonderful windfall to people on their residential real estate taxes.

“Everybody loved it.”

Yet now school districts are feeling pressure to raise money for schools in other ways, he noted.

Peterson said he could support a tax increase to boost school funding, “form and details to be determined.

“Philosophically I do not have an objection to a revenue increase. I don’t know where we’re going to get it – but that’s my job now.”

On a casino proposed for Bloomington, Peterson said: “No dice.” The state would have to abrogate previous agreements to establish a casino in Bloomington, he said.

Sen. Geoff Michel

State Sen. Geoff Michel said he is optimistic that legislators will come together on a bipartisan basis to address the state’s fiscal crisis during the upcoming legislative session.

“Balancing the budget and getting the job done on time must be our highest priority,” said the District 41 Republican senator who represents Edina and western Bloomington.

Michel said he expects legislators not to waste their time holding up confirmations and appointments so that they can focus more on the budget, transportation, education, healthcare and other issues.

Michel said he would approach the state’s now estimated $700 million shortfall by looking at the Health and Human Services budget.

“You can’t fix the budget without looking at Health and Human Services,” he said.

The state will spend 26 percent, second in spending only to education, of its 2004-2005 budget on Health and Human Services, according to a February forecast from the Minnesota Department of Finance.

Michel said reducing the $7 billion figure by 10 percent could alone erase the state’s deficit, but he said such a reduction wouldn’t be easy.

“We have to ask ourselves how we treat the less fortunate,” he said. “That will be the greatest challenge we must give the most attention to when looking at any reductions in this area.”

Likewise, Michel said health care would need the attention of state legislators this session.

“We can’t afford to think only about right now,” he said. “We need to start thinking years ahead of now.”

Health care is a personal, business and a jobs issue for Minnesotans, Michel said.

One way he expects future health-care costs to begin decreasing is with the passage of a statewide smoking ban.

“Some version of a smoking ban will pass,” Michel said. “We need something uniform for the entire state.”

He said he believes the passage of many municipal and county bans during the last year has prepared business owners and the public for such a ban.

Finding agreement on a transportation plan, however, may be more of a challenge, Michel said.

“Transportation in Edina and Bloomington is at the top of every resident’s agenda,” he said. “It’s the daily headache we all have to deal with.”

Michel said he would support an increase in the state’s gas tax to aid in road construction costs, but he wouldn’t expect it to be as much as 10 cents a gallon as some groups have suggested.

“I think that if we do see an increase in the gas tax, it would likely be more like 5 cents,” he said. “It would definitely create new revenue, but it still wouldn’t be enough for our needs.”

Michel said the state’s legislators must also look at new revenue options for the state’s schools.

He said he supports inflationary increases in per pupil funding for the state’s schools and allowing individual districts to turn to their own voters to approve levy increases.

“K-12 education must be at the top of our priorities,” Michel said. “It’s the biggest piece of spending.”

He said the state’s freezing of education funding has damaged districts throughout the state already and will continue to do so if something isn’t done.

“It’s time to give them more money,” Michel said.

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Edina&story=149940


Local legislators preview 2005 session  -MN
By Sue Webber, Teri Kelsh, Justin Piehowski and Marc Ingber
Sun Newspapers
(Created 12/30/2004 4:03:45 PM)
 Education, health care and transportation are among the most compelling issues that will be facing the 85th session of the Minnesota Legislature when the gavel sounds Tuesday, Jan. 4.
A large number of freshmen legislators who were elected in November 2004 have spent the last two months attending orientation sessions and learning procedures to be followed.

They, along with lawmakers who have experienced the process in previous sessions, are awaiting Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s budget proposal.

Here is how local legislators see the upcoming issues:

Sen. Ann Rest

Sen. Ann Rest of New Hope, DFL-45, who represents all of Crystal, New Hope and Robbinsdale, and parts of Golden Valley and Plymouth, said adequate and appropriate school funding “always is the number one issue in our area.”

Rest, formerly a teacher in Robbinsdale District 281 schools, served in the Minnesota House from 1984 to 1999. She was elected to her first term in the Senate in 2000.

“Education is the Legislature’s top priority,” Rest said. “Our constituents are telling us over and over again that quality schools make the most difference in people’s lives.”

Rest said she “absolutely will vote to increase education funding.”

She also supports a gas tax increase to fund road construction, Rest said.

“Transportation and transit is key to the economic vitality of the northwest suburbs,” Rest said. “We still have to keep talking about compromises in transportation and transit planning. It’s going to be multi-modal, with light rail and buses. Light rail has been an overwhelming success. People are routinely using it; people really do commute on it. North Star will be another element.”

The state borrowed money in 2003, depending on funding from the federal government, Rest said.

“We’re hundreds of millions of dollars in the hole because they [the federal government] didn’t pass the bill,” Rest said. “We’re just standing still. In transportation, that’s really like going backwards, just like education.”

One of the proposals now on the table would allow single-occupant vehicles to pay to drive in underused high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on Interstate 394, Rest said.

“We’re looking at using what we have and trying to be more efficient in keeping traffic moving,” she said.

Rest is hoping to work to advance a bill this session for an air cargo facility that would allow the Twin Cities metro area to become a major air freight center.

“Now much is trucked as far as Memphis before being sent overseas,” she said. “There are proposals in both the House and the Senate to do that here.”

Health care is another huge cost center for the state, Rest said.

“We need to make sure we continue care for the most vulnerable, and recognize that access to health care is a right, not something to be taken away,” she said. “It’s a very thorny issue. Being efficient doesn’t mean taking it away.”

Though proposals for dealing with the state’s deficit have yet to come, Rest said, “We have an obligation to find a solution. Voters in the 2004 election were very clear about that. They won’t put up with anything less. People who were successful in [the election in] 2004 said everything has to be on the table.”

Rep. Sandy Peterson

Rep.-elect Sandy Peterson of New Hope, DFL-45A, who represents all of New Hope and portions of Crystal and Plymouth, said K-12 education and higher education is her top priority for the upcoming session.

A former Robbinsdale District 281 school teacher who most recently was vice president of Education Minnesota, the state teacher’s union, Peterson said, “The schools have been starved for years here.”

As she campaigned door to door last fall, she said, “The public realizes that our future is in an educated society.”

Citizen groups have tried to raise funds to buy teachers and pay for supplies that should be the responsibility of the school system, she said.

“We’ve got to get real here about what we need to do,” Peterson said. “With the changing diversity, we need to realize people cannot teach effectively with 29 to 35 kids in a class.”

Transportation needs are especially important to the business community, Peterson said. “We can’t continue the way we’re going,” she said.

Regarding the budget, Peterson said voters are “so disgusted.”

“They see now that the cuts and the money we got back [in rebates from then-Gov. Ventura] were not advantageous in looking to the future,” Peterson said. “People are frustrated.”

The governor has said there will be no new taxes, and yet people are paying franchise fees, increased costs for higher education and taxes have skyrocketed, Peterson said.

“We’re paying, one way or the other,” she said.

She is adamant that no more taxes be shifted to local property owners, and that no more Local Government Aid (LGA) funds be taken away from local communities.

“We’ve really suffered from that loss,” Peterson said.

Peterson said she believes voters expect the Legislature to start working on Day l, rather than waiting until the end and then requesting a special session to complete their work.

“The voters are very, very tired of bipartisan issues,” Peterson said. “The people sent us a message. They want some partnerships, and spirited but respectful debate. Because of the 68-66 split [between Republicans and Democrats in the Legislature], I think it’s possible. I hope that will be our legacy as a new group – to come to some compromises and agreements that make sense.”

Rep. Ron Latz

Rep. Ron Latz, DFL-44B, who represents Golden Valley and St. Louis Park, said by the end of the 2005 legislative session he expects legislators to balance the budget in a “fair and reasonable manner and pass a capital bonding bill that meets the infrastructure needs across the state.”

Also high on his priority list for the session is garnering sufficient funding for K-12 education. Latz suggests the Legislature increase per pupil funding at the very least by the rate of inflation. He also supports raising the levy cap and giving local school districts the authority to levy to the rate of inflation without seeking a referendum from voters.

Latz said he will push for restoring funding for early childhood education, which he described as being at “bare bones.”

“It’s the most cost-effective approach we can take to educating our children,” said Latz. “It’s an incredible return on our investment.”

In the last legislative session, Latz authored a bill to ban smoking statewide. It didn’t pass. But this year he plans to re-submit the bill and is more confident of its approval.

He expects the smoking issue to be a major factor in the Legislature relating to the cost of health care.

“Smoking is a toxic health hazard. For two reasons I support a ban: One is improve the health of workers in bars and restaurants; two, to reduce healthcare costs. Smoking is a significant portion of what’s driving up healthcare costs in Minnesota,” said Latz.

He also supports Blue Cross/Blue Shield’s proposal to increase the cigarette tax by $1.

When it comes to transportation, Latz said he wants to see “balanced funding for a balanced system.” He supports raising the gas tax to at least 5 cents a gallon. These dedicated funds would go toward constructing roads and bridges. Specifically, he wants some of the money used in St. Louis Park to remove the bottleneck on Highway 100.

“I would like to see a source of funding for light rail, high speed bus lines and more bus lines. It all has to work together. We can’t just keep building more roads,” said Latz.

Rep. Lyndon Carlson

As Rep. Lyndon Carlson, DFL-Crystal, prepares to head into his 33rd legislative session in as many years, he sees the budget as “the overwhelming issue.”

Carlson, who represents Crystal, Robbinsdale, and a portion of Golden Valley, said he has several priorities within the budget, but atop his list is seeing that a good bonding bill is passed early in the session.

Another key piece to this year’s budget, according to Carlson, is to make sure that public education, both K-12 and higher education, are funded adequately all across the state.

He is particularly concerned about two issues relating to education: Early Childhood Education and All-Day Kindergarten. If the Legislature is not able to extend these opportunities to children all across the state, Carlson would at least like to see them expand this year.

Carlson is also concerned about the skyrocketing tuition costs at the University of Minnesota and at Minnesota’s State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU).

A lack of funding will lead to lower quality schools and will hinder ability for some students to access higher education at all, Carlson explained.

Carlson said that his first preference is for the state to fund all education across the state adequately, but if that doesn’t happen, he said school districts “may be a need some flexibility with their [tax] levy limits.”

Trying to pass legislation that will allow people to have access to prescription drugs at reasonable costs will be the “core issue” surrounding the health care debate at the Capitol this winter, Carlson said.

He added that he expects the legislature find ways to encourage residents to lead healthier lifestyles.

Carlson supports a statewide smoking ban in bars and restaurants as well as the right of local governments to ban smoking within their jurisdictions. He feels this issue should be covered by the broadest jurisdiction possible to ensure “a level playing field.”

The issue of a gas tax to increase transportation funding will need to be addressed this session, Carlson said. He pointed out that the business community is generally supportive of a gas tax.

However, legislators are still unsure of how Gov. Tim Pawlenty will act if a bill proposing a gas tax crosses his desk, Carlson explained.

As far as transportation projects are concerned, Carlson said he is very supportive of the Northstar Rail Line, as well as the Northwest Corridor Busway along Bottineau Boulevard (County Road 81).

Regarding the busway, Carlson said he’d like to see the neighborhoods involved with more of the planning, so residents know exactly where it is going to run.

Carlson said to realistically solve the budget deficit of at least $700 million, legislators are going to have to look at a way to bring in more revenue, which may mean tax increases.

“One of the reasons Minnesota has had such a strong economy is that we’ve invested adequately in K-12 and higher education,” Carlson explained. “Hopefully, Minnesota residents will look at how those investments have paid dividends over the years and be willing to continue investing in people.”

Carlson said he welcomes comments from constituents throughout the session. He can be reached by phone at 651-296-4255 or by email at rep.lyndon.carlson@house.mn.

Sen. Steve Kelley

Sen. Steve Kelley of Hopkins, DFL-44, represents all or part of Golden Valley, Hopkins and St. Louis Park.

Kelley said that his No. 1 goal for the upcoming legislative session was to adequately fund public schools in Minnesota. A lack of funding is not only a problem in Golden Valley, Hopkins and St. Louis Park, he said.

“All around the state, schools are hurting,” Kelley said. “We have to reverse that trend for Minnesota to remain a great education state.”

In addition to supplying more funding for schools, it’s important to develop a pay system for teachers that is in the hands of each district and local officials, he said. Seniority and experience can’t be the only factors in determining teachers’ pay, he said.

“We have to go to the governor and others and say, ‘The needs of our students have to come first,’” he said.

He expects the Legislature to pass a balanced budget in the upcoming session, he said, which would include funding for education and transportation.

He said there is a need to widen Highway 100 in St. Louis Park and he would support a gas tax to fund road construction.

“Even the Chamber of Commerce realizes we have to invest in our transportation infrastructure,” Kelley said.

He said borrowing money to pay for road construction doesn’t work. Other transportation issues Kelley would like to work on include the elimination of highway bottlenecks and investing in more transit options.

He said he would support a statewide smoking ban, provided he approves of all the conditions in the bill, because the public health benefits are numerous. Many communities have passed smoking bans, he said, recognizing the health benefits, and now it’s time to move to a statewide ban to create consistency among all the communities.

Other health issues that should be addressed include Medicaid and stem cell research, he said.

“We have to make sure our residents in nursing homes are taken care of,” Kelley said of rising Medicaid costs. He also said it is critical for the state to explore stem-cell research.

He is in favor of lifting school district levy limits, he said, but was unsure what would pan out in the upcoming legislative session.

“I support doing it and I hope we can get something done,” he said, “but I’m not sure it will happen. It’s a controversial issue.”

Another of Kelley’s goals for the upcoming session is to get moving on a bonding bill for St. Louis Park very early, he said.

A successful budget plan will help support Minnesota’s strengths, he said.

“The governor has the responsibility to propose a budget that doesn’t use gimmicks or tricks,” hesaid.

What’s next

A town hall meeting with Sen. Ann Rest, Rep. Lyndon Carlson and Rep. Sandy Peterson is scheduled for 10 to 11:30 a.m. Saturday, Jan. 8, at the Crystal City Hall, 4141 Douglas Drive.

Town hall meetings with local legislators Rep. Steve Simon, Rep. Ron Latz and Sen. Steve Kelley are scheduled for 7 to 8:30 p.m. Jan. 24 in Golden Valley; 7 to 8:30 p.m. Jan. 31, Hopkins; and 10 to 11:30 a.m. Feb. 5, St. Louis Park.

Specific locations have yet to be determined.

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Golden_Valley&story=149989


Local legislators preview 2005 session  -MN
By Mike Hanks, Troy Pieper and Sally Thompson
Sun Newspapers (Created 12/30/2004 4:04:35 PM)

Balancing the budget is without a doubt the No. 1 priority for most legislators this upcoming session.

Rep. Steve Smith

As chairman of the House Judiciary Policy and Finance Committee, Rep. Steve Smith, R-33A, helps oversee public safety issues.

“Our focus will include revision of the state’s sexual offender laws so as to get the ‘worst of the worst,’ the violent sexual predator off the streets for good and locked up for life,” he said.

Strengthening laws dealing with methamphetamine producers and putting them out of business is another focus, Smith said.

“And in general, our focus is to ensure that when your son or daughter leaves home in the morning, that at the end of the day, they will come home safe,” he said.

Before the end of the 2005 legislative session, Smith said he expected legislators to pass a biennial state budget setting priorities and doing the work of the state, without raising taxes.

Smith said he does not support a statewide smoking ban.

As far as health care, “Minnesota has the best health care available,” he said. “It is also a fact that Minnesota ranks No. 1 in the nation in percentage of residents covered by health insurance. It is a fact that only one-third of 1 percent of our population is uninsured.

“We will attack the cost of prescription drugs and health insurance with these keys: increase competition from sellers; expand consumer choices; reduce law suits and red tape and provide tax incentives to empower consumers to make wiser health choices.

While Smith stands firm with “no new taxes,” he said better roads leading to quicker commutes can be provided through dedication of the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) to transportation. Also, using state government bonding for road construction is possible.

Saying he would support an increase in funding for K-12 education as well as lifting local school district levy limits, Smith said, “How money is allocated to school districts by the Legislature is as important as how much money is allocated.

“We need to simplify the system and put more money into the per-pupil formula, which treats every child the same and roll back the volume of state mandates the Legislature previously has placed on our local schools and boards.”

To deal with the deficit, the Legislature should continue the reform started when Gov. Tim Pawlenty was elected two years ago, and that means balancing the budget without raising taxes.

Spending must be prioritized, and state government must be reformed, he said.

Smith can be reached at Minnesota House of Representatives, 543 State Office Building, St. Paul, MN 55155, by calling 651-296-9188 or by e-mailing him at rep.steve.smith@house.mn.

Rep. Barb Sykora

Education finance, cost containment for health care and a long-range transportation plan to alleviate congestion in the metropolitan area are among the priorities of sixth-term state Rep. Barb Sykora, R-33B, this legislative session.

As chair of the Education Finance Committee, Sykora will lead a group of state legislators who will be looking at how the state funds its schools, and how to find more money for them. She supports allowing individual districts to seek higher operating levies from their voters. Districts with property wealth should be allowed to provide additional financing for education, if their voters choose to do so, noting that the state’s funding formula “is not as fair as it could be,” she said.

In addition to providing districts with more money, the committee will also “try and find a better way of paying teachers,” according to Sykora. She supports a concept that provides economic rewards for teachers based upon their classroom results and willingness to participate in the professional development of other educators. Performance initiatives provide greater incentive to teachers than a negotiated wage percentage increase, and will help attract new teachers, Sykora explained.

Solutions to containing health-care costs will not be easy to come by, according to Sykora, but “we’ve got to come up with some ways to control those increases.” Allowing small business owners and farmers the ability to pool their money across a greater population to obtain less expensive health care is one reform that is needed, Sykora said. She also expects discussion to resurface regarding a limit on financial claims in lawsuits pertaining to health care and further discussion on lowering costs for prescription drugs.

A long-range transportation plan is another of Sykora’s key issues. “Most of the rural areas don’t see transportation as a major problem,” she noted. “For the metro it’s a major issue,” she added. “We’ve got to do something to relieve congestion.”

To that end there is no single answer. Building new highways or extending light rail service won’t solely resolve transportation issues, she said.

Sykora supports the exploration of personal rapid transit, a concept developed at the University of Minnesota that has greater potential than light rail transit. It can be developed at a lower cost, and provides greater flexibility as users would travel along a rail system in smaller cars, and at their convenience rather than on a set schedule, she explained.

Sykora supports an increase in the state’s gasoline tax, acknowledging that there’s disagreement over how much is acceptable. If the tax is increased, she would like to see the allocation formula revisited, as the metropolitan counties, especially Hennepin County, do not receive enough in return for their contributions, according to Sykora.

While earmarking a higher percentage of automobile sales tax to transportation would be beneficial, to do so would leave a hole in the general fund budget, she noted.

Sykora does not see a need for the state to consider a smoking ban. That decision is best left with city and county units of government, she said.

The state has a variety of issues to address this session, and Sykora is optimistic many of those will be resolved. “I expect us to reach an agreement on our budget deficit,” she said, noting it is smaller than the deficit the state reached during the last biennium. Reaching a budget agreement will help the House, Senate and governor solve other state issues, she noted.

Sen. Gen Olson

“Our overall priority this session is a balanced budget, and I will be playing a part in that” said Sen. Gen Olson, R-33.

Olson said that an important issue for her in the upcoming session would also be the spread of zebra mussels. “We need to put more effort into controlling zebra mussels in this region and in areas where they haven’t spread yet,” she said.

She plans to meet with the Department of Natural Resources and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to find ways of combating the problem such as a labeling system for boats that have been in contaminated water.

One interesting goal of Olson’s is to raise the “personability and acceptability” of personal rapid transit, or PRT. PRT would be a new transit infrastructure comprised of an elevated rail and automated two- to three-person cars that run on electricity. A working system has never been built, but a local company is developing the technology with support from the private and public sectors, according to several Minneapolis newspapers. “It’s not likely to need subsidies, it’s as green as you can get, and it will relieve pressure on roads,” said Olson, who does not support a gas tax to pay for more roads.

However, the senator does want to see more roads built, and hopes to “keep the pace we’ve had in the last several years,” which included money for roads in last session’s bonding bill, she said.

Olson believes the whole system of funding for education in Minnesota needs to be revisited. She said she hopes to add to the formula for education funding, allowing for the decisions on referendum levies to be made locally. “If they want to spend additional money, I would like to see support for that, but I do not want to see the total removal of the cap on levies,” Olson said.

Another decision that should be made on a more local level, according to Olson, is on smoking bans. She said she does not support a statewide ban; local businesses and communities should make that determination. She would support it, she said, if the federal government “stopped subsidizing tobacco production and ended its addiction to the cigarette tax.”

Olson plans to push for changes in the state healthcare system that would encourage people to have what she called “health savings accounts.” The accounts, which would use pre-tax dollars, would ease the burden on employers, she said. “That’s part of the mix, but it’s a direction we ought to be making more attractive,” Olson said.

The senator said the Minnesota teachers union promotes a statewide pool for the acquisition of health insurance. “This would be a further drain from our districts, which are already at a disadvantage,” she said.

The 2005 legislative session begins Jan. 4.

http://www.mnsun.com/story.asp?city=Orono&story=150079


Apple Valley, Rosemount legislators discuss upcoming session -MN
By Erica Christoffer Sun Newspapers (Created 12/30/2004 3:48:11 PM)

A projected $700 million deficit, K-12 funding, a bonding bill and transportation are only a few of the issues the legislators from Apple Valley and Rosemount will address during the upcoming 2005 state legislative session.

The representation has changed slightly, however, since last year. Sen. Chris Gerlach, R, will begin his first session in the Senate representing District 37, which serves Apple Valley and Burnsville. Gerlach won a special election this past summer to fill the remaining two years of the term vacated by Dave Knutson.

Rep. Lloyd Cybart, R, now represents House District 37A, defeating Shelly Madore, DFL, to win his first term in office. The seat formerly belonged to Gerlach.

And long-time legislator Rep. Dennis Ozment, R, will begin his 11th term representing residents in Rosemount and Apple Valley House District 37B.

As the session gets underway Jan. 4, local legislators are also expected to discuss a statewide smoking ban, health care and environmental issues.

Sen. Chris Gerlach

Passing the Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit is Gerlach’s top priority for his district. Last year, $10 million was dedicated for the project in the bonding bill that passed in the House but failed in the Senate.

“We’re getting short changed from MnDOT and the Met Council in the Dakota County area,” Gerlach said. “We’re only getting 34 cents on the dollar from our gas tax contributions as well.”

As far as light rail, Gerlach said it is too expensive and requires too many subsidies.

“It seems to be more about local economic development than it does moving people from point A to point B,” Gerlach said. “Bus lines seem to be about a fourth of the cost and they’re flexible in that you can change routes and you can change them to meet changing demographic patterns.”

Gerlach opposes a gas tax increase under the current distribution formula, which puts Dakota County as one of 11 counties that pays more than it receives.

“We need to equalize that out a little bit,” Gerlach said. “The money is not going to where it’s needed.”

Gerlach said he would not support a state-enacted smoking ban because he said the issue will take care of itself though the free market.

“More and more restaurants and establishments are going smoke free because they find that in the marketplace, their customers demand it,” Gerlach said. “We don’t have to have the government jump in on everything and dictate it. Let’s let it follow its natural course and you’ll find more and more smoke-free places over time.”

On health care, Gerlach said he expects legislation regarding federal conformity with the health savings accounts.

“We have to start here and that’s going to help kick-start the health savings account market,” he said.

Gerlach also foresees a proposal to reduce tax assessments on small businesses for health care by raising the cigarette tax. It will mean lower premium costs for employers and employees. However, Gerlach said he is undecided on the issue.

In terms of funding for K-12 education, Gerlach said he would support an increase.

“I don’t intend on raising taxes. I think there’s enough wiggle room left in the budget. It’s just a question of the decisions we have to make,’’ he said. “The goal is to achieve that inflationary increase.”

Gerlach said the budget for Health and Human Services is projected to increase by 20 percent. He said he hopes for less of an increase to cover costs in education as well as the projected deficit.

“You can’t take the compassion out of it,” Gerlach said. Health and Human Services needs to serve those who truly need the safety net, he said, as well as connecting people with their health care decisions and the costs and bring competition into the health care marketplace.

Gerlach called the projected deficit of $700 million “manageable.”

As for the bonding bill and the Minnesota Zoo’s request for exhibit expansion funds, Gerlach said he supports reviving the state institution.

“It’s time now for the Legislature to step up and fulfill their obligation and make sure that the zoo has what it needs to be successful,” Gerlach said. “I don’t know what the exact dollar amount will be, but I’ll be supportive of whatever the governor comes forth with.”

Last year the zoo requested $68 million from the state and Gov. Tim Pawlenty proposed a dedication of $34 million. However, because the bonding bill never passed, the zoo didn’t see any appropriation.

The thread that runs through all the various topics this year is “we have to get the job done,” Gerlach said. “I’m excited about it. I’m coming at this stuff from a whole different angle now.”

Sen. Chris Gerlach can be reached at 651-296-4120 or 952-432-4100 or by e-mail at sen.chris.gerlach@senate.mn.

Rep. Lloyd Cybart

While door knocking during his campaign this fall, Cybart said one of the most common comments he heard regarded the gridlock last year in the Legislature.

The freshman representative hopes to move issues forward in the House while representing his district during the 2005 session.

One issue he hopes to address is the bonding bill. Cybart said he supports the $34 million the governor had earmarked for the Minnesota Zoo’s exhibit expansion.

“I’m sure it will be along the same lines,” Cybart said.

As far as a smoking ban, Cybart said he supports local control rather than the state taking on the issue.

Health care is also going to be a huge issue this session, Cybart said, “with the runaway costs, something has to be done.”

Ideas he foresees being discussed are health savings accounts, tort reform and curbing state expenses, specifically in Health and Human Services and its anticipated 20 percent budget increase, he said. That increase will need to be dealt with to keep deficit spending down, Cybart said.

On the issue of a gas tax increase, Cybart said he would not support it under the current distribution formula.

“It’s a lop-sided formula, the rural areas get more than the suburban areas,” Cybart said. “If we raise the gas tax it’s still a disproportionate amount of the taxes coming back to Dakota County to fix our problems.”

Cybart’s top priority in transportation is the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along Cedar Avenue as well as similar transit options along the Interstate 35W corridor in Burnsville to alleviate congestion and bottlenecks into the cities.


Posted at 4:25 pm by looped_ca
Make a comment

Thursday, December 30, 2004
research the truth

Court classifies paintball guns as weapons, citing use in vandalism-PA

Posted on Fri, Dec. 24, 2004

HARRISBURG, Pa. - A student who kept six paintball guns in the trunk of his car violated a state law against possession of a weapon on school property, in part because he used one of the guns to commit vandalism, the state Superior Court has ruled.

The defendant, then 17, and another youth drove away from Central York High School during lunch hour in September 2003 to fire a carbon dioxide-powered paintball gun at three parked vehicles and a garage door, according to court records. Police recovered the guns after the boy's father consented to a search of his car that night.

The youth, unnamed in court documents, was charged with possessing a weapon on school property; improper use of paintball guns, air rifles and paintball markers; and criminal mischief. He admitted to the acts of vandalism, authorities said.

York Common Pleas Judge John Uhler in January found him delinquent, but the case was appealed to Superior Court to challenge Uhler's determination that paintball guns are among the weapons prohibited on school grounds.

State courts had previously ruled that gas-powered BB guns should be considered weapons, but had not considered the question of paintball guns.

In a decision released Thursday, Superior Court Judge Richard B. Klein wrote that the mere possession of the guns would not have been criminal if one had not been used illegally.

Klein cited an exception to the prohibition of weapons on school property if the weapon is "used in conjunction with a lawful supervised school activity or course or is possessed for other lawful purpose."

The defendant had used the gun the previous night at a church-sponsored paintball game and intended to participate in another such event after school on the day of the incident.

"While it is a close case, I believe the unlawful use during the lunch hour deprives the defendant of the defense ... that he had the paintball guns for a lawful use," Klein wrote.

The youth's lawyer, public defender Scott E. Lineberry, said Friday that without the vandalism, the ruling might have gone the other way.

"How far is the court going to extend that definition of weapon? What about a kid on the archery team? If they have a bow and arrow sitting in the trunk of their car - is that going to constitute a weapon? It's an open question, I suppose," Lineberry said.

Klein said the law's firearms definitions are "all over the lot in different sections of the statutes" and noted that "baseballs and hockey pucks can cause serious bodily injury or even death. So can a pencil if poked in someone's eye."

Lawmakers could have made it clear that the penalties for having a firearm on school property also apply to paintball guns, he said.

"The Legislature knew how to spell out nunchuck sticks, and it could have spelled out paintball guns as well," Klein wrote.

ON THE NET

Opinion: http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Superior/out/s46028_04.pdf

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/10493898.htm

 


Study finds modest drop in teen drug use  -PA

SAM HANANEL, Associated Press Writer12/26/2004

WASHINGTON – Fewer teenagers are smoking cigarettes or using illegal drugs‚ but a survey released Tuesday shows a troubling increase in the use of inhalants by younger adolescents.

The smoking rate among younger teens is half what it was in the mid-1990s‚ and drug use by that group is down by one-third‚ according to the University of Michigan study‚ done for the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Less dramatic strides have been made among older teens.

Health experts and government officials called the annual survey of eighth‚ 10th and 12th-graders a sign of continued progress in the effort to reduce youth drug use and said further declines would come only with a sustained public education campaign about the consequences of drug abuse.

Overall‚ illicit drug use among teens declined by 7 percent in the past year‚ and 17 percent in the last four years. There are now 600‚000 fewer teens using drugs than there were in 2001.

“These are sustained‚ broad and deep declines‚” national drug policy director John Walters said at a news conference. “The challenge before us is to follow through.”

Altogether‚ gains in 2004 over 2003 were modest. Researchers are troubled by increases – especially among eighth-graders – in the use of inhalants such as glue and aerosols‚ and a rise in the use of the pain-control narcotic OxyContin. Use of most other drugs declined or held steady.

Health officials said they are concerned that use of inhalants‚ which are easily accessible to children‚ may rebound unless children are warned about the grave dangers they pose. Inhalant use had been declining since 1995‚ when the Partnership for a Drug-Free America began an anti-inhalant media campaign.

“Research has found that even a single session of repeated inhalant abuse can disrupt heart rhythms and cause death from cardiac arrest or lower oxygen levels enough to cause suffocation‚” said Nora Volkow‚ director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Researchers also noted the apparent growing popularity of OxyContin‚ a powerful and potentially addictive synthetic narcotic. Up to 5 percent of 12th-graders and smaller percentages of younger teens reported having tried it in the last year‚ the study showed. By contrast‚ 1 percent or less of teens had tried heroin in a year.

The survey found 15 percent of eighth-graders‚ 31 percent of 10th-graders and 39 percent of 12th-graders had used drugs in the previous year – down 1 percentage point or less from the year before.

This was the eighth consecutive year that smoking rates among surveyed teens dropped‚ a turnaround that began in 1996 among students in grades eight and 10 and a year later among 12th-graders.

 

Researchers credited higher cigarette prices‚ tighter marketing practices‚ anti-smoking ads and withdrawal of the Joe Camel logo among reasons smoking has fallen out of favor with more teens. Close to three-quarters of surveyed 12th graders now say they’d rather not date a smoker‚ up from close to two-thirds in 1977.

 

“When smoking makes a teen less attractive to the great majority of the opposite sex‚ as now appears to be the case‚ one of the long-imagined benefits for adolescent smoking is seriously undercut‚” said Lloyd Johnston‚ lead researcher for the Monitoring the Future study.

Overall‚ the percentage of eighth-graders who had ever tried cigarettes declined to 28 percent this year‚ down half a percentage point from 2003 and from a peak of 49 percent in 1996.

About 41 percent of 10th-graders had tried cigarettes‚ down 1 percentage point from a year earlier and from 61 percent in 1996.

And 53 percent of high school seniors had smoked at least once in their lives‚ down 1 percentage point from 2003 and from more than 65 percent in 1997.

Even so‚ cigarette use has hardly been stamped out among youth. The study reported that 25 percent of 12th-graders said they had smoked within 30 days of being surveyed‚ as did 16 percent of 10th-graders and 9 percent of eighth-graders.

The study also found that progress in discouraging teen drinking in recent years held steady for the lower grades in 2004. Researchers said it would take another year to know whether a small increase in drinking by seniors was real or a statistical blip.

http://www.thereporteronline.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=13627584&BRD=2275&PAG=461&dept_id=466404&rfi=6

 


Latest news in brief from northern Nevada-NV

December 26, 2004 at 17:14:40 PST

INCLINE VILLAGE, Nev. (AP) - A rash of fires set by juveniles in Incline Village has resulted in a new program in line with the area's zero-tolerance policy on the problem.

Youthful offenders in the north Lake Tahoe community now must attend a three- to four-hour program that features a video presentation about the consequences of starting fires.

Twenty fires have been set by youths over the last year in Incline Village, up from a total of six over the last decade, fire officials said.

Lake Tahoe faces one of the highest fire threats in the nation because of overgrown forests.

The program adopted by the Washoe County Sheriff's Department and North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District is similar to one used by the Henderson Fire Department.

"The problem was getting way out of hand and we had to find a way to deal with it on the prevention end," said Tom Smith, fire marshal for the local fire district.

"The kids that get in trouble for starting fires, bringing fireworks to school or even being caught in possession of a cigarette lighter can find themselves in the program," Smith added.

Youthful offenders will be given talks about what "messing around with fire" can do to themselves as well as an entire community.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2004/dec/26/122610923.html

 


Bonds set for men involved in stabbings  -FL
Read more Crime in St. Johns County online

By LORY POUNDER Staff Writer Sunday, December 26, 2004

Circuit Judge Robert Mathis set bonds for two Jacksonville men involved in separate stabbings Christmas Eve in St. Johns County.

 

Suspect Faron Perry wanted to plead his case to Mathis during Saturday morning's first appearance in the county jail's courtroom.

"Don't tell me about the case that carries ... 30 years in prison," Mathis cautioned Perry who had not been appointed a lawyer.

About 11 a.m. Friday, Perry, 49, of 10602 Patchwork Road in Jacksonville, stabbed his ex-employer numerous times in the neck and chest area, said Deputy Greg Suchy.

Perry's bond was set at $150,000 for a charge of attempted murder.

"I acted in self-defense," Perry said Saturday.

Perry said he tried to claim a paycheck owed to him after he was fired several days ago. He went twice to see his former supervisor, Brian Kilhof, 25, of 4608 Martindale Road. Finally, he gave him an ultimatum, Perry said.

A fight broke out at the construction job site at Palencia development off U.S. 1 between Perry and Kilhof, Suchy said.

"I would have walked away, but he wouldn't have let me," Perry told the judge.

Kilhof's injuries were not life-threatening, Suchy said.

Forty-five minutes later, Steve Reeve Tolbert, 42, of 2812 Sunnyside St. in Jacksonville, was arrested on a charge of aggravated domestic battery.

Mathis set his bond at $10,000 with the stipulation that he have no contact with the victim.

Tolbert cut his son around the eyes and nose in a car at the Belz Outlet parking lot, Suchy said.

Tolbert's son, Alvin Anderson, 21, did not have life-threatening injuries, and his mother took him to the hospital, Suchy said.

Tolbert said Saturday that he told his son not to light a cigarette, but he did anyway. They started to argue and Anderson jumped out of the passenger side and ran around the vehicle, Tolbert told the judge.

"He was telling me how he going to hurt me and jump on me," Tolbert said. "He done this before. He came around and swung on me."

Family members, including Anderson's mother and other children, were in the vehicle at the time.

Mathis told both men a lawyer would be appointed to defend them.

http://www.staugustine.com/stories/122604/new_2787458.shtml

 


Enough to scare you to death -UK

 By Fionnuala Bourke, Sunday Mercury Dec 26 2004

This is one of the shocking graveside images designed to scare parents into finally quitting smoking in the New Year.

The NHS has launched the hard-hitting TV adverts today as part of an unprecedented £6 million Government push to encourage more mums and dads to quit the killer habit.

One heartbreaking image shows two distraught children leaving the graveside of their father following his funeral. A wreath is shaped simply in the word 'Dad'.

Another sees a young girl laying flowers on her parent's grave, and a floral tribute spelling the word 'Mum'.

One film shows mourners huddled round a grave during a funeral service. The words flashed on the screen read "Always went outside to have a cigarette'.

A fourth has a mother struggling to break the news that she has cancer to her kids.

On each, an accompanying caption reads: "Giving up. The only way to protect your family from the effects of smoking."

The new drive, which seems designed to make smoking parents feel guilty, follows a series of hard-hitting campaigns in recent years, including ads showing fatty deposits in smokers' arteries.

The adverts also feature real-life exsmokers who quit with the help of their local NHS Stop Smoking Service, including Midlander Peter Lee.

Mr Lee, from Leamington in Warwickshire, began smoking when he was at university. By his 30s he had a 20-a-day habit and his GP referred him to his local NHS Stop Smoking Service.

The 38 year-old, who has now been a non-smoker for two years, said: "My NHS advisor was brilliant. I found understanding the psychology behind giving up smoking as well as seeing what it was doing to my body - through weekly carbon monoxide monitoring - extremely motivational.

"Most important of all, I felt supported and reassured that I was doing something positive in my life. I absolutely did not want to let the adviser, or myself, down."

NHS figures show that over the Christmas break around 3,000 people - including many parents - will die due to smoking-related illnesses such as cancer and heart disease.

Latest figures from the West Midlands Public Health Group show nearly a quarter of adults in the region smoke. This is despite research that reveals one in two smokers will die early because of the habit and spiralling costs of cigarettes.

Paul Hooper, of the West Midlands Public Health Group, said: "It's more important than ever to give up smoking this year because of all the help around to help smokers succeed.

"There are more products to help them quit and local NHS Stop Smoking Services have proven highly successful.

"Also, more places are going smoke-free than ever before. And with the law about to change to ban smoking in more public places, it's a good idea to quit now.

"You can't expect to pass your driving test without having any lessons, similarly you can't expect to give up smoking without help.

"Even if people have tried to give up before and failed, they can always try again as there is no need to give in to smoking.

"We especially want people to under-stand they should not be afraid of nicotine products.

"Nicotine makes people addicted to cigarettes, but it's the 4,000 chemicals they contain that wreck their health."

* For more information on stopping smoking call the NHS Smoking Helpline on 0800 169 0 169 or visit www.givingupsmoking.co.uk.

http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_objectid=15014590&method=full&siteid=50002&headline=enough-to-scare-you-to-death-name_page.html

 


Anti-smoking drive targets families -UK
Lee Glendinning The Guardian Monday December 27, 2004
 An emotive image of grieving children laying flowers beside their father's grave is one of the central features of a new anti-smoking campaign aimed at families.

A series of five adverts showing parents and children struggling to come to terms with terminal cancer was launched yesterday as part of a £6m government campaign to encourage more people to quit smoking in 2005.

Scenes include children huddled around their mother at their father's funeral with the line "Never smoked around his children". Another advert features a girl laying a wreath spelling out "mum", while one shows a group of mourners at a grave with the line "Always went outside to have a cigarette". All the adverts will carry the message: "Giving up smoking - the only way to protect your family."

Up to 3,000 people will have died of smoking-related illnesses such as cancer and heart disease between Christmas Eve and January 4.

Recent figures from the University of London reveal that only 30% of smokers try to stop, and fewer than 3% a year succeed. For the government to achieve its promise to cut smoking to 21% of the population by 2010, 50% must try to stop and 6% succeed.

The stories of real-life ex-smokers who gave up after being helped by the NHS Stop Smoking Services will be used in the second part of the new campaign from January 4.

Last year, the services, which offer one-to-one counselling and nicotine replacement therapy, helped 200,000 people to quit smoking.

"We know 70% of smokers want to stop smoking. For some, however, fears about their children can be a stronger motivation to actually quit than fears for their own health," the public health minister, Melanie Johnson, said. "I am confident that the uncompromising message of this advertising will hit home with many parents."

But Simon Clark, the director of the smokers' lobby group Forest, said: "Everyone knows there are risks associated with smoking but these advertisements stigmatise all smokers irrespective of whether they are long-term heavy smokers or moderate smokers who keep fit and enjoy a healthy diet.

"To play on people's fears like this is cynical and manipulative."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1379913,00.html

 


Where is all the tobacco money?

Originally published December 26, 2004

I thank the good Lord the day He gave me the will power to stop a 40-plus-year smoking habit; that was six years ago.

I worried when I did smoke when there was talk of raising the price on a pack of cigarettes. My question is this: What has happened to all of the cigarette money that we are supposed to have? Where has it gone, and, if it is still in the bank, why must the price of a pack of cigarettes be increased?

Don't get me wrong: I am against smoking but I do believe it is an individual's choice to decide if he or she wants to quit. There are a lot of things that are far worse than smoking a cigarette.

So, does anyone know what happened to all that money?

David Saucier Jr.

Lumberton

http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041226/OPINION03/412260303/1014

 


Albany lobbyists gear up for 2005 -NY
By John Milgrim  Capitol Bureau 12/27/04

ALBANY — Christmas may be history, but a legion of special-interest groups, from medical centers and health-care workers to environmentalists and educators, hope state lawmakers stay in the giving mood for several months to come.

And their hands are already out, hoping the state adds billions more to the current $100 billion budget.

Like years past, advocates and organizations began making their pitches early this month with hopes of being included in next year’s budget. They’ll continue the seemingly incessant pleas at least until a budget is passed, which did not happen until August this year.

Many will try to make their cases through rallies and news conferences as part of their annual multi-million dollar lobbying efforts to sway the opinions of power brokers. For some unwilling or unable to negotiate closed-door deals with state leaders, they are the only tools available to get what they want.

And sometimes, the more noise they make, the more money they get.

"A squeaky wheel does get the grease, not to mix too many metaphors here," said Blair Horner, legislative director for the New York Public Interest Research Group.

Environmental groups, such as the Sierra Club, want a doubling of the amount the state spends on land protection and park projects. Anti-smoking groups, like the American Cancer Society, want to double spending on state programs meant to help people quit.

In each case, the groups are talking about tens of millions of dollars in new state spending, and they’ve suggested ways the state could pay for it, such as increasing cigarette taxes.

Others are calling for spending increases in the billions.

A state court is expected to order the city and state to spend an additional $1.4 billion on New York City’s schools alone.

And heath-care workers and medical institutions are expected to push for the Health Care Reform Act, worth several billion dollars to their industry.

Even before new money is spent, however, the state is facing as much as a $6 billion budget deficit, according to Gov. George Pataki. By the third week in January, he’s expected to propose a spending plan showing who gets what.

Horner, who advocates on such issues as government reform, higher education and the environment, said groups with the least political clout, or money, often only have the public forum to make their cases. College students, for example, have a poor record of showing up at the polls and they rarely make political contributions, which often helps others access lawmakers who control the purse strings.

"On the other hand, the case they are making (for a public investment in education) is enormously popular," Horner said. "It’s not like we are trying to get a tax break for millionaires. The advocacy for that is focused on giving money to well-connected lobbyists to advocate in the dark."

E.J. McMahon, a senior fellow with the conservative Manhattan Institute think tank, said in Albany’s political climate, the most effective advocacy for state resources happens behind closed doors.

"Probably the most effective lobbying tool is the ever-popular implied promise of a campaign contribution followed closely by the implied threat of support for an opponent,"McMahon said.

Sometimes, the special interests have the greatest success employing a variety of tactics to sway political opinion their way.

Take, for example, the state’s largest health-care workers union. The Service Employees International Union local 1199 spent more than $10 million last year for an Albany rally of some 30,000 people and a statewide advertising campaign. They called for new taxes on the wealthy and more spending on health care.

In 2002, Dennis Rivera, president of the 350,000-member union, was credited with orchestrating substantial salary increases for health-care workers in legislation state leaders agreed to behind closed doors.

That same year, Gov. George Pataki won the union’s endorsement as part of a successful campaign for re-election.

http://www.thedailystar.com/news/stories/2004/12/27/lobby.html

 


Season turns blue for tobacco farmers ky

Manufacturers off the hook for balance of Phase II payments

By JOHN FRIEDLEIN

Hardin County farmers lost more than $1 million in expected tobacco settlement money when a North Carolina judge ruled that, because of the buyout that ended the quota system, companies no longer must make the final Phase II payment.

"I'm disappointed," said Elizabethtown grower Larry Thomas. "Every tobacco farmer is, I'm sure."

This news is another setback for growers and quota owners who have been coping with years of dwindling profits. "It's just another loss," Thomas said. Even the buyout approved by Congress this fall was less money over a longer period of time than some quota owners had hoped. The $10.3 million will be paid out over 10 years.

As for the 2004 Phase II money, Kentucky growers expected to receive $124 million, with $1.3 million of that going to local producers, said Thomas, who sits on the board of directors of the state Farm Bureau Federation.

North Carolina Business Court Judge Ben Tennille released cigarette companies of the obligation Thursday. An appeal is expected.

This is the sixth year of the $5.15 billion Phase II program, which would have lasted a total of 12 years. The money was intended to help farmers make up for loss of revenue from higher cigarette prices.

A final payment made this week or early next year would have helped carry growers over until buyout payments start next August. For the average producer, yearly Phase II payments are about the same as buyout payments are expected to be, said Ray Allan Mackey, a local farmer and president of the Hardin County Farm Bureau.

If farmers thought the state would make up for the loss of these payments, they'd be wrong. State officials have compensated for a shortfall in Phase II money in the past, but the law that allowed it does not make up for the absence of any sort of payment, said Keith Rogers, executive director of the governor's office of agricultural policy. Also, the North Carolina judge continued a moratorium on disbursment of those funds.

"That money had been promised," Mackey said. "The money should have already been set aside."

Tobacco companies made some Phase II payments this year, but farmers have not received the funds and the manufacturers expect to receive refunds.

"Clearly, the tobacco companies are not meeting their agreed upon obligations," said White Mills grower Steve Meredith. "It's a significant amount of money that we would have anticipated." It's also money he, other farmers and even those who lend to growers had figured into their budgets.

Meredith also said he would have been better off had the Phase II payments continued, instead of the buyout funds.

Because of the ruling, individual Hardin County farmers lost up to a few thousand dollars this year, Mackey said.

Not only will they not get a Phase II check, but they must also deal with production losses caused by one of the wettest years on record and, possibly, lower contract prices. Because of these factors, most tobacco farmers must consider whether or not to grow next year, Mackey said. "There's a lot of decision making yet to be done."

John Friedlein can be reached at 769-1200, Ext. 237, or e-mail him at jfriedlein@mail.the-ne.com.

http://www.newsenterpriseonline.com/articles/2004/12/27/news/news01.txt

 


In Mississippi, Many Want Higher Tobacco Taxes

December 27, 2004

(Angus Reid - CPOD Global Scan) – Many adults in the state of Mississippi back a proposal for higher tobacco duties, according to a poll by the John C. Stennis Institute of Government at Mississippi State University released by the Mississippi Health Advocacy Program. 63.5 per cent of respondents support a $1-a-pack tax increase on cigarettes.

Mississippi currently has the third-lowest cigarette tax in the United States, at 18 cents a pack. The national average is 84 cents a pack.

The Magnolia State has not raised its cigarette levies since 1985. 80.4 per cent of respondents want to spend the tax to fund health care programs, 78.6 per cent of respondents want to reduce tobacco use among kids, and 74.6 per cent see it as an option to deal with the state’s Medicaid budget problems.

Republican governor Haley Barbour—elected in November 2003—has pledged to fight any tax increase. Earlier this year, Barbour proposed shifting close to 50,000 state residents off the Medicaid program, but a federal judge temporarily denied the plan.

Polling Data

Support for tax proposal rationale and spending
(Only "Support" respondents listed)

 

Support a $1-a-pack tax increase on cigarettes 63.5%
Support the tax to fund health care programs 80.4%
Support the tax if it would reduce tobacco use among kids 78.6%
Support the tax as an option to deal with the Medicaid budget 74.6%

Source: John C. Stennis Institute of Government at Mississippi State University / Mississippi Health Advocacy Program
Methodology: Telephone interviews to 601 Mississippi adults, conducted from Nov. 9 to Nov. 23, 2004. Margin of error is 4 per cent.

http://www.cpod.ca/polls/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&itemID=5411

 


Experts: Second-Hand Smoke Poses Health Risk  -WV

By BETHENY HOLSTEIN

With the ongoing discussion of creating a smoke-free work environment in most of Ohio County's businesses, some people are wondering what the effects of secondhand smoke really are and whether they are bad enough to limit a person's opportunity to light up.

  The U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 3,000 lung cancer deaths and 35,000 coronary heart disease deaths occur each year in adult nonsmokers as a result of exposure to secondhand smoke.

  "Out of every eight individuals that the tobacco industry kills, one of them has never smoked a cigarette - ever," said Dr. Michael Blatt, a local pulmonologist.

  Secondhand smoke, which also is called environmental tobacco smoke, is the mixture of the smoke from the burning end of a cigarette or other tobacco product and the smoke exhaled by the smoker.

  According to the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, a recent CDC study puts the adult smoking rate in West Virginia at more than 27 percent, which is the highest among all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

  Area cardiologist Dr. Robert Fanning pointed out that secondhand smoke also is associated with an increased chance of coronary artery disease, and that risk applies not only to those who may live with a smoker, but also those who are simply exposed in passing.

  "There is up to a 50 percent increase in coronary artery disease among those exposed as opposed to those who have not been exposed to secondhand smoke," Fanning said. He referred to a temporary clean indoor air regulation in Helena, Mont., which prohibited smoking in most places for about six months, and he pointed out that for the period of time the regulation was in place, heart attacks in the area dropped by 60 percent from the time period prior to the regulation. Additionally, after the ban was lifted, the rates of heart attacks again rose.

  "There is no doubt that the vast majority of studies published have all shown a reduced risk of heart attack from not being exposed to cigarette smoke," Fanning said. "I can't think of a better reason, as a cardiologist, to want to reduce smoking than a reduced risk of heart attack."

  He said that when cigarette smoke hits the body, it causes a constriction of blood vessels, activation of platelets and an increase in fibrinogen levels in the blood. Fibrinogen is an enzyme produced by the liver that the body uses to clot blood.

  All three of these activities within the body lead to a more sluggish blood flow, which can lead to heart attack.

  "The prevailing theory is that passive smokers are not accustomed to the smoke," Fanning said, adding that the result of that inexperience is that the smoke has a greater degree of effect on the person.

  Additionally, environmental tobacco smoke also causes serious lung problems, according to Blatt. He pointed out that secondhand smoke is responsible for nearly 150,000 acute lower respiratory infections per year, and he also added that of the 4,000 know chemical compounds in cigarette smoke about 69 are know to cause or are suspected of causing cancer.

  "A non-smoker who is exposed to secondhand smoke also starts to have damage to the lungs," Blatt said, explaining that the damage can make a person more likely to have respiratory infections.

  Also, Blatt said the particulate matter in environmental tobacco smoke can increase the risk of a person having an asthma attack, and the carbon monoxide in the smoke inhibits the ability of the blood the absorb oxygen. 

  "It was determined that the levels of cigarette smoke in restaurants is approximately two to three times more than one would would find in a home, and in bars, it is three to four times higher," Blatt said.

  Local pediatrician Dr. Charles H. Staab III added that many children he treats suffer from chronic respiratory ailments due to secondhand smoke.

  "I cannot prevent some of my patients from having chronic ailments because their parents smoke," Staab said. "I cannot get them to get better."

  Staab also pointed out that some children become over-sensitive after exposure to secondhand smoke, and they cannot be around the smell or remnants of the smoke without adverse effects.

  "We also know that if the mother or father smokes in the home, the children have two to three times the rate of respiratory infections and ear infections," Staab said, adding that secondhand smoke is also linked to sudden infant death syndrome, asthma and reactive air disease.

  According to the CDC, about 60 percent of people in the United States have some sort of biological evidence of their exposure to secondhand smoke, and information from the CDC also indicates that in 1991, nearly 90 percent of Americans have a measurable level of serum cotinine, a substance produced when nicotine is metabolized in their blood.

http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/508991/

 


Blair asked by ethics watchdog about holiday -UK

Sun Dec 26, 2004 01:14 AM GMT

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Tony Blair has been asked by parliament's ethics watchdog about allegations he failed to declare a holiday at the home of an executive with ties to the tobacco industry.

A spokeswoman for Blair confirmed on Sunday that parliamentary standards commissioner Philip Mawer had written to the prime minister about his stay two years ago at a French chateau owned by Alain Perrin.

"It's a letter which hasn't been replied to yet," the spokeswoman said. "Whatever needs to be registered will be registered."

Perrin is a former chief executive of Richemont and remains an executive director with the luxury goods group, which owns about a fifth of cigarette maker British American Tobacco.

In November, the British government proposed a smoking ban for all workplaces, public buildings, restaurants and pubs in which food is served. It has also introduced new controls on tobacco advertising.

The allegations appeared in the Sunday Telegraph newspaper, which said opposition Conservative member of parliament Chris Grayling had complained to Mawer that Blair failed to enter his stay in the register of members' interests.
 

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=643876

 


Snus Ruse

Why lie about smokeless tobacco when a misleading half-truth will do?
Jacob Sullum

The European Union's highest court recently upheld the E.U.'s 12-year-old ban on oral snuff, saying it serves "the objective of health promotion." Since cigarettes, a far more hazardous form of tobacco, are still legally available in Europe, the E.U.'s policy is rather like banning bows and arrows as an intolerable threat to public safety while allowing a free trade in machine guns.

Worse, tobacco consumption patterns in Sweden, the one E.U. country where oral snuff (known there as snus) remains legal, suggest that Eurocrats are contributing to smoking-related disease and death by foreclosing a safer alternative to cigarettes. As the vice president of Swedish Match, the leading snus producer, put it, "Snus is clearly a significantly less harmful product than cigarettes and could play an important role in a much more responsible harm reduction strategy than the current cynical Quit or Die approach."

Swedish Match obviously has a strong interest in reversing the oral snuff ban. But its position has a solid enough empirical basis that prominent European health researchers and a leading British anti-smoking activist likewise have decried the "Quit or Die approach."

In the U.S., where smokeless tobacco remains legal, this approach takes the form of a misinformation campaign that encourages people to think oral snuff is just as dangerous as cigarettes. That belief, which seems to be widely accepted by smokers, is clearly wrong.

Based on the incidence of tobacco-related deaths among users, University of Alabama at Birmingham oral pathologist Brad Rodu estimates that smokeless tobacco is 98 percent safer than cigarettes. The difference is so stark that public health officials have been forced to quietly retreat from their false risk equivalence.

Last year, for instance, Surgeon General Richard Carmona told a congressional subcommittee "smokeless tobacco is not a safer substitute for cigarette smoking"—a claim that is scientifically unsupportable. But in the version of his testimony that appears on the Web site of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, he says "smokeless tobacco is not a safe alternative to cigarettes"—the same true but misleading warning that appears on oral snuff packages.

Similarly, a CDC Web page aimed at children asks, "Is smokeless tobacco safe?" The answer: "No way!" But the search listing for the page shows that the question used to be, "Is smokeless tobacco safer than cigarettes?" I suspect the CDC's answer was not "You bet!"

Perhaps the most telling recent change in the official line on smokeless tobacco was made to a pamphlet published by the National Institute on Aging. When I looked at the online version of the pamphlet in March, it said: "Some people think smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco and snuff), pipes, and cigars are safer than cigarettes. They are not." The passage now reads: "Some people think smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco and snuff), pipes, and cigars are safe. They are not."

This change came in response to a March 16 complaint from the National Legal and Policy Center arguing that the pamphlet violated the Data Quality Act by disseminating erroneous information. Among other sources, the complaint quoted a 2001 report from the National Academy of Sciences that said "the overall risk [from smokeless tobacco] is lower than for cigarette smoking, and some products such as Swedish snus may have no increased risk" (because they're especially low in carcinogens).

The fact that public health officials seem less inclined to tell outright lies about smokeless tobacco is a small victory. They are still obscuring the issue by doggedly repeating that smokeless tobacco is not risk-free when the relevant point for a cigarette smoker who is thinking about switching is that it's much less likely to kill him than his current habit.

Meanwhile, their allies in the private sector, unconstrained by the Data Quality Act, continue to explicitly promote the myth that smokeless tobacco and cigarettes are equally dangerous. "Some people believe that using smokeless tobacco is safer than smoking," the American Cancer Society says on its Web site. "This is not true."

The staffer who wrote that might want to ask Michael Thun, the society's chief epidemiologist, for a copy of the December issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. That issue includes a study in which a panel of experts estimated that the mortality risk posed by Swedish-style oral snuff is at least 90 percent lower than the risk posed by cigarettes. What makes me think Thun has a copy? He was one of the experts.

 

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason and the author of Saying Yes: In Defense of Drug Use (Tarcher/Putnam).

http://www.reason.com/sullum/122404.shtml


Do cigarette additives pose additional risk to smokers?

28 Dec 2004

The US government does not approve or control the "599 list" of non-tobacco chemical ingredients used to manufacture cigarettes. These additives, such as acetic acid (vinegar), chocolate, vanilla, and menthol are found in everyday foods. Scientists, supported by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), generally regard these substances as safe in foods, but the risks for smokers are not known after combustion in cigarettes and inhalation. Can the toxicological effects for smokers be measured? A new report concludes they can.

The Study
The independent, non-profit organization Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO) (http://WWW.LSRO.ORG) is conducting a review of how to determine the potential risk of non-tobacco additives for cigarette smokers. In a previous report LSRO concluded that testing added ingredients was feasible. In this latest published report, Evaluation of Cigarette Ingredients: Scientific Criteria, LSRO establishes scientific criteria for assessing the impact.

The criteria are based on the work of an expert panel, composed of Alwynelle S. Ahl, Ph.D., D.V.M., Highland Rim Consultancy, Lyles, TN; Carroll Cross, M.D., Professor, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Shayne Gad, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., President, Gad Consulting Services, Cary, NC; Donald Gardner, Ph.D., F.A.T.S., President, Inhalation Toxicology Associates, Raleigh, NC; Louis Homer, M.D., Ph.D., Medical Director (ret.), Legacy Research Foundation, Portland, OR; Rudolph Jaeger, Ph.D., Principal Scientist, Environmental Medicine, Inc., Westwood, NJ; Robert Orth, Ph.D., President, Apis Discoveries, LLC, Cedar Hill, MO; Emmanuel Rubin, M.D., Chair, Department of Pathology, Anatomy, and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; James Schardein, M.S., F.A.T.S., Consultant, Leesburg, FL; and Thomas Slaga, Ph.D., President, AMC Cancer Research Center, Denver, CO. Phillip Morris, USA funded the study.

Methodology
To identify optimum scientific criteria for additive testing, the investigators compared conventional toxicological and regulatory approaches to epidemiological studies. LSRO could not find toxicological tests that predicted the full range of adverse human health effects. Of particular concern was the difficulty in determining "safe" levels of additives in the context of the obviously unsafe act of smoking. To overcome these problems, LSRO adopted a relative risk approach. Investigators could compare cigarettes containing an ingredient to otherwise identical cigarettes lacking the same ingredient. This approach allows researchers to factor out the adverse health effects, revealing the effects of the additive, if any. This approach focuses on inhalation testing within a smoke matrix, instead of ingestion testing of purified additives.
Findings
The researchers concluded that this approach could establish whether:
(1) the additive, or a pyrolysis product of the additive, did not detectably transfer into cigarette smoke in such a way that smokers might be subject to a change in risk;
(2) the additive did not significantly change the chemistry, physics or biological properties of smoke; and
(3) the additive did not change exposure to cigarette smoke through altered smoking behavior.
If the additive met these three criteria, the expert panel concluded that they would not anticipate that use of the ingredient would increase adverse human health effects. If the additive did not meet one of the criteria, the panel recommended further testing. This could include reducing the amount of ingredient added and retesting or obtaining additional data demonstrating no change in the relative risk of adverse human health effects. The report gives examples.
Conclusions
The purpose of the report was not to create a safer cigarette. The authors state that the primary purpose of additive testing should be to assure the public that the additives do not increase the risk of premature death or illness beyond the levels already associated with smoking. Accordingly, they urge smokers to remember that regardless of the findings from testing, there remain significant risks from smoking even "additive-free" cigarettes.
Next Steps
LSRO will now embark on the next phase of the project, evaluating the impact of individual additives.
For nearly half a century, the Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO) has provided expert objective scientific opinions and evaluations to governmental agencies and leading corporations in the food, health and bioscience sectors. A non-profit organization originally established in 1962 by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, LSRO provides independent science-based analysis and advice.
Editor's Note: A copy of the report is available to the press in pdf format. To receive a copy or schedule an interview, please contact Donna Krupa at 703-527-7357 (office), 703-967-2751 (cell) or djkrupa1@aol.com.
Contact: Donna Krupa djkrupa1@aol.com 703-527-7357 (office)  703-967-2751 (cell)
Life Sciences Research Office

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=18385


Americans Balk At Fast-Food Lawsuits

July 23, 2003

(CPOD) Jul. 23, 2003 - Americans believe litigation against the fast-food industry is not warranted, according to a poll by Gallup. 89 per cent of respondents oppose legal action against restaurant chains.

Several attorneys have suggested possible lawsuits against the fast-food industry, in cases reminiscent of the first legal disputes against tobacco companies in the 1970s. 66 per cent of respondents do not believe restaurant chains are responsible for a customer's health problems.

Most Americans agree that fast-food is not healthy. 76 per cent of respondents believe such meals are not good for them.

Polling Data

Would you favor or oppose holding the fast-food industry legally responsible for the diet-related health problems of people who eat fast food on a regular basis?

 Favor        9%                Oppose  89%

 How responsible is the fast food industry for the health problems faced by obese people in this country?

Very / Somewhat responsible                    33%             Not too / Not at all responsible                   66%

 Overall, do you think that most of the food served in fast-food restaurants is very good for you, fairly good for you, not too good for you, or not good at all for you?

Very good            1%

Fairly good          22%

Not too good      53%

Not good at all    23%

Source: Gallup
Methodology: Telephone interviews to 1,006 American adults, conducted from Jul. 7 to Jul. 9, 2003. Margin of error is 3 per cent.

http://www.cpod.ca/polls/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&itemID=404



Posted at 12:30 pm by looped_ca
Make a comment

Next Page