Smoking Rights






   

<< February 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28


Our Web Page

Ontario Health Promotion Resource System

Smokers Rights Canada

Forces

Our Newsletter


Anti Smokers:
National Clearinghouse on Tobacco and Health Program
Serves the information needs of health intermediaries.

How they Lie- The Truth









Sunday, February 20, 2005
Actions speak lounder then Words

"Man acquitted of threatening ex-boss after being fired for smoking on job" -ON

by Dianne Wood Feb16, 2005 Local section Page B2
Justice Epstein agreed Andrew Palubeskie's words were threatening in nature but couldn't conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he threaten to cause seroius bodily harm to the plant manager at UltraMetal Inc.
Palubeskie, 48, worked there for 11.5 years until he was fired for smoking in April 2003. He violated the company's no-smoking policy after being given
three warnings. He was earning $22 to $25 an hour as a machine operator.
He got another job but was laid off in June 2004 when that business closed.  He was having a hard time finding a new job.
"People were telling me, it's got to be UtraMetal giving you an unfavourable reference."
An employee in the HRD of the company where he was laid off contacted his former employer and was told the he had been fired for smoking.
Several days after he learned this, Palubeskie left a series of messages on his former boss's answering machine at work.
" I figured it was dirty pool what you guys did to me, I gave 11.5 years there."
He wanted the company to stop giving him bad references and left the message" If you don't, there's gonna be big trouble and I am not kidding. I'm a bad person. Take it whichever way you  like to go because my life can go either....way. You guys want to hurt me. In that case, I will hurt back".
The plant manager felt threatened by the message because of  Palubeskie's tone of voice. "I don't know if there was a personal attack intent or not.
Palubeskie said that by "big trouble" he meant that he knew of some illegal activity the company was involved in that he could reveal..
The judge called the messages "certainly a failure of dipolmacy, but hardly a threat to cause seriou bodily harm. There's got to be some room to speak a
little harshly, wothout crossing the line of criminal  conduct. The broad blunt axe of criminal law is, perhaps, something used to much."
A charge of criminal harassment was dismissed.

Kitchener Record


Inquiry launched over sailor's disappearance

CBC NewsLast Updated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:25:01 EST

HALIFAX - A military board of inquiry has been convened to investigate the disappearance last week of a sailor aboard HMCS Montreal.

The navy announced Wednesday that Cmdr. Sean Cantelon will head the inquiry to find out what happened to Leading Seaman Robert Leblanc.

Leblanc, 24, is believed to have fallen overboard and drowned during a naval exercise in the Baltic Sea on Feb. 8.

 FROM FEB. 9, 2005: Search called off for missing Canadian sailor

 When the sailor didn't report for his shift, the crew searched the frigate twice. Then HMCS Montreal retraced its route to scour the water off Poland for any signs of Leblanc.

The search was called off about 20 hours later, when officials decided there was no chance of finding him alive. The temperature of the water was just above freezing.

A senior navy official said Leblanc was last seen smoking a cigarette in an enclosed area of the ship. He also said crew members had been told to stay off the ship's outside decks because of ice.

The military's investigative service has been looking into the case.

If it finds there was something criminal about Leblanc's disappearance, the service will handle the investigation.
However, if the service cites accidental or natural causes, the board of inquiry will proceed.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/02/16/missing-sailor050216.html


The end of a most beautiful friendship

Meet my recently ex-friend or rather, friends, as they always travel in packs of 20

By JOHN SHEARD Wednesday, February 16, 2005 - Page A18

It was with a curious mixture of excitement and dread that I recently celebrated (if one can use that word) my 50th birthday -- the same feeling you get on the long, slow ascent of a roller coaster as you look down at the shrinking world you once knew. I had decided, some time before, that my 51st year on the planet would begin with the death of a beautiful friendship.

Let me tell you about my friend or rather, friends, as they always travel in packs of 20, neatly arranged in a pocket-sized white box adorned with the picture of a camel. For 30 years, we have been inseparable and insuperable in all the big, bright moments of life.

We've been together also in the darkest ones. Through it all I'd have to say it was a pretty fair arrangement and I had no complaints. But even the bravest of friendships sometimes ends rudely and with the reaper's scythe gleaming faintly in the distance, I knew our affair was over.

It's tough to explain a nicotine addiction to those who haven't lived it. It becomes your identity, the sine qua non of daily life. It's there at bedtime, and there still when you rise. The cigarette is that perfect, compact antidote to the circadian stress storms. It's the lifeboat that bobs along in your wake . . . unthinkable to leave it behind.

Like all smokers, I had amassed quite a cache of rationalizations for my habit. I was the man with the answer for every occasion, the bob for every weave, the parry for every thrust. And then one day I looked around to find that I was part of a very select minority; I was one of the last members of a club nobody wants to belong to any more. I had arrived at the distillate moment of truth -- and how I ever arrived at that bittersweet place will always be a marvel to me, no matter how it all turns out.

I fixed my 50th birthday as D-Day and puffed away contentedly as I waited for it to arrive.

On that brilliant autumn day, I took the long walk to the kitchen where I forced myself to crush the remaining dozen or so cigarettes in the pack and toss them into the garbage. (Well, you always hurt the ones you love.) It was almost an out-of-body experience, totally unreal, as though I were watching someone else do it. I stood there for a moment in quiet horror. No mistaking -- the deed was done and no looking back.

I suppose my arrival at those crossroads so late in life is due in equal measure to good old procrastination and the sure knowledge that I was paying no great price for my addiction. I am undeservedly fit and have often found great sport in jogging past my non-smoking friends up the trail hills and waiting patiently for them at the top, sucking on a cigarette. And really, I'd always been the picture of health -- no smoker's hack and actually quite blasé when it came to the odd five- or six-hour non-smoking flight. That said, I never met a cigarette I didn't like, nor have I ever disparaged the warm, comforting glow of a butt on a Canadian winter's night.

But of course there's a hefty cost; aside from the monetary one (about $3,000 a year by loose reckoning) there's the ignominy of being the only guest at the dinner party who skulks off like Gollum to suck away on the porch in February while the sane ones are inside, all safe and warm. But the most profound price, I'd come to face, is that which is paid by those closest to you: spouse, parents, close friends and those insufferably righteous nieces and nephews. I couldn't ask them to pay it any longer.

So it's farewell to old and fast friends -- to the coffin nails, as Bogie called them. Such a small thing really, in trade for the tears of relief cried by the near and dear.

Now I will embrace my new identity as Non-Smoker with the zeal of the recently converted. That moniker still fits me like a bad suit after only a few months but I'm getting there. In fact, the whole thing has been much easier than I expected. The hard part is really making the decision in the first place. Once you've pictured that moment, the rest is just mind over matter.

So I'll either win the war of the weed or be the Steve McQueen character in The Great Escape who gets only so far each time before being re-captured, I don't know.

I only know that I want badly to win and that must make the difference for me because I like it here in my new world. Everything's different now, you see, even the sky is different; the smells and the tastes -- all changed.

And that bobbing lifeboat falls a bit farther behind me each day.

John Sheard lives in Toronto.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050216/FACTS16/TPComment/Features


NHLBI Study Shows Smoking Cessation Programs Improve Survival

    WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 14 /CNW/ - New findings from the Lung Health Study (LHS) show that intensive smoking cessation programs can significantly improve long-term survival among smokers. Supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), LHS is a landmark study that differs from many other studies of cigarette smoking in that it was a randomized, controlled clinical trial -- considered the gold standard in determining cause and effect; furthermore, the size and duration of LHS enabled it to more accurately measure the risks associated with smoking than other clinical trials. NHLBI is part of the National Institutes of Health.
    LHS followed nearly 5,900 middle-aged smokers who had mild to moderately abnormal lung function but were otherwise healthy when they enrolled in the study. Participants were assigned to either a 10-week intensive smoking cessation program or to usual care (no intervention). The intervention program included behavior modification and use of nicotine gum, with a continuing five-year maintenance program to minimize relapse. After five years, approximately 22 percent of the participants in the smoking cessation program were sustained quitters, with nearly 90 percent of them continuing their success after 11 years. About 5 percent of those who did not receive the intervention were sustained quitters after five years. After an average of 14.5 years, the death rate among those in the smoking cessation program was about 15 percent lower compared to those who received usual care. The results are published in the February 15, 2005, issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.
    "This study shows the substantial impact smoking cessation programs can have on public health, even if small numbers of participants successfully quit," said Gail Weinmann, MD, director of the NHLBI Airway Biology and Disease Program.
    Researchers also analyzed mortality data according to smoking habit regardless of whether participants were in the intervention or usual care groups. At the end of the study they found that sustained quitters had nearly half the overall death rate of those who continued to smoke. In particular, death rates of sustained quitters compared to smokers were nearly one-third lower for coronary heart disease and for cardiovascular disease, and less than half for lung cancer.
    In an accompanying editorial, Jonathan Samet, MD, MS, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, notes that the LHS findings prove that "smoking is causally responsible for the increased risk for death in smokers." He asserts, "No one can make a serious claim to the contrary in light of this randomized trial evidence."
    Smoking is the single most avoidable cause of disease, disability, and death in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 22.5 percent of adults (46 million) and 26 percent of high school seniors smoke. Smoking contributes to more than 440,000 deaths per year.
    Dr. Weinmann is available to comment on the study. To interview Dr. Weinmann, please call the NHLBI Communications Office at (301) 496-4236.  To interview an expert about smoking and cancer, please contact the National
Cancer Institute Press Office at (301) 496-6641.

    Clinical centers for the Lung Health Study were:

    -  Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    -  Birmingham, Alabama: University of Alabama at Birmingham
    -  Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University
    -  Detroit, Michigan: Henry Ford Hospital
    -  Los Angeles, California: University of California
    -  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University at Pittsburgh
    -  Portland, Oregon: Oregon Health Sciences University
    -  Rochester, Minnesota: Mayo Clinic
    -  Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah
    -  Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Manitoba
    -  Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota (Data Coordinating Center)

    For more information about the Lung Health Study, visit http://www.biostat.umn.edu/lhs/.
    Information about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a condition in which the lung is damaged -- usually due to cigarette smoking -- is available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/Diseases/Copd/Copd_WhatIs.html.
    Resources to help smokers quit are available at www.smokefree.gov.

    NHLBI is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Federal Government's primary agency for biomedical and behavioral research. NIH is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Additional information about NHLBI-supported research and educational programs are
available online at the NHLBI website, www.nhlbi.nih.gov.
http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/February2005/14/c4088.html


Peel Regional Police - Man sought for armed robberies  -ON

    PEEL, ON, Feb. 17 /CNW/ - The Peel Regional Police Central Robbery Bureau is asking for the public's assistance in locating a man wanted for armed robbery.
    Shane Charles MACINTOSH, 24 years, of Mississauga, is sought for an armed robbery that occurred on Sunday, January 23rd, 2005, at approximately
3:30 a.m. The accused and two associates entered a convenience store, located in the Lakeshore Road and Hurontario Street area of Mississauga. Two employees were robbed of a quantity of cash and cigarettes at gunpoint.
    MACINTOSH is described as male, white, 5'11" tall, 160 lbs., with brown hair. He is considered armed and dangerous. If MACINTOSH is spotted, do not approach him and call police immediately.
    MACINTOSH is believed to have been involved in several other robberies in the Peel and Halton regions. Peel Regional Police Service is working with Halton Regional Police Service to locate this man.
    A photograph of MACINTOSH can be viewed by clicking on
http://files.newswire.ca/53/MACINTOSH1.jpg and http://files.newswire.ca/53/MACINTOSH2.jpg
    Anyone with information is asked to call the Central Robbery Bureau at 905-453-2121, ext. 3410, or call Peel Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS/8477.
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2005/17/c5583.html


Ontarians want choice when it comes to smoking in bars, restaurants and Legions

    Fair Air Association of Canada calls on provincial Liberals to support DSRs
    TORONTO, Feb. 16 /CNW/ - An independent study conducted for the Fair Air Association of Canada (FAAC) by Northstar Research Partners shows that 70% of Ontarians believe that bar owners who have invested in ventilated smoking areas should be allowed to maintain them.
    Similar to findings in May 2004, ventilated smoking areas continue to be the preferred option of Ontarians when it comes to public smoking in age- restricted bars and pubs. When presented with realistic options - designated smoking rooms (DSRs), a complete ban or unrestricted smoking, half of Ontarians (52%) state a preference for DSRs. While this is the preferred choice of a majority of smokers, it also emerges as the preference of 44% of non-smokers.
    "We continue to call on the government to recognize the obvious: banning smoking in bars, bingo halls and legions doesn't make people quit smoking. Smokers just stay home and smoke - while the hospitality industry suffers," said Karen Bodirsky, CEO of the Fair Air Association.  The Ontario government is currently engaged in Second Reading Debate on Bill 164, legislation that will ban smoking in public places, including those which have invested in effective, efficient ventilation systems. FAAC calls on the government to allow Designated Smoking Rooms within the framework of the legislation.
    "It's a solution that works in BC and in many other jurisdictions across Canada," said Bodirsky. "It's a solution that must be included for Ontario." 
    The Fair Air Association of Canada is committed to the promotion of sound ventilation science and support of the hospitality industry. Its members include bars and pubs, hotels, tobacco manufacturers, ventilation companies and engineers, bingo halls and bowling alley operators.

    Study background and methodology:

    All interviewing for this study was conducted between February 11th and 13th, 2005 using a telephone survey methodology. Respondents were called using a random digit dialing technique. The sample was drawn in proportion to population distribution across the province. A gender quota was also applied
to ensure equal representation of males and females in the sample. In total, 507 interviews were completed. The results of this sample size are accurate within a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points, 19 times out of 20 (95% confidence level)

For further information: Media contact: Karen Bodirsky, CEO, FAAC  (416) 214-2737, Karen@faac.ca

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2005/16/c4852.html


Poll iffy

The Calgary Herald - 2.12.2005

Smoking - Re: "Albertans back smoking ban: poll," Feb. 7.

It appears that while Les Hagen's motives may be noble, his poll and resultant assessment are not. Ask yourself what the poll results might have been if the questions had been asked at bingo halls, bars and casinos, instead of malls or wherever. And if you are paying someone to conduct a poll, then what might you expect the answer to be? If you truly believe that 72 per cent of the population agrees with banning smoking, then I suggest you check the contents of your pipe.

As a former smoker, I agree we need to seek ways to help people stop smoking and to encourage non-smokers to remain that way. I don't think we've done an effective job of this yet because the percentage of people smoking has not significantly declined. New thinking is required. I don't, however, feel this is best done by polls that can be easily manipulated to serve a biased need.

Larry Yarmchuk
Calgary

http://faac.ca/content/news/2005.02.12-1.htm


Smoke-free Ontario spells doom for casino

Writing as one of the several thousand Ontarians who will be out of a job the day Ontario goes smoke-free, I have a question. The casino is hoping for millions from the government to expand in order to keep up with competition from over the river. A fourth possible Detroit-area casino would surely take another slice from an ever-shrinking pie. My question: why would the government spend a cent on Casino Windsor when the day it goes smoke-free it will lose business that it will never get back? This is not a maybe, this is a fact.

Business owners have bent over backwards to accommodate the non-smokers and make their lives as smoke-free as humanly possible -- not to mention the millions of dollars they have spent to do this.

For Windsor to go smoke-free would truly be a disaster that we won't see until it happens. Countless jobs and millions of dollars in charities would be lost very soon afterward. I'm sure that Detroit is one community that is hoping that Ontario goes smoke-free because they will be the only ones that benefit financially.

By the way, every person who applies to work at a bingo, a casino, a bar or a restaurant knows that people smoke in designated areas. They don't find out on the first day of work.

http://www.canada.com/windsor/windsorstar/news/letters/story.html?id=1e9c7b38-f04e-423f-bc9d-99e5cc6e50f8


Bowling alley owner fights ban on designated smoking rooms -ON

The Standard (St. Catharines - Niagara) - 2.7.2005

NIAGARA FALLS - Chris Biamonte wants the provincial government to butt out and he's looking to his customers for support.

As owner of Cataract Bowl of Niagara Falls, Biamonte recently spent $45,000 to install a designated smoking room in the Lundy's Lane bowling alley in anticipation of the June 1, 2004, changes to municipal smoking bylaws.

Last month, the Ontario government introduced new smoke-free legislation, the Smoke Free Ontario Act, that would essentially ban the 700 designated smoking rooms now available in bars, bingo halls and other venues across Ontario , effective May 2006.

Biamonte is circulating a petition at the bowling alley, asking customers to voice their concern over the legislation, which has been billed as one of the toughest anti-tobacco measures inNorth America .

"If you're willing to spend that kind of money to put a smoking room in, one that complies with the health department and everything else, what is the problem?" Biamonte asked.

There are currently 52 designated smoking rooms in Niagara region.

"Our smokers are happy with the room, our people who don't smoke are happy because they don't have to smell the smoke ... everybody is happy and that's what we want," Biamonte said.

Since smokers account for almost 60 per cent of his clientele, Biamonte said banning the designated smoking rooms could spell disaster for Cataract Bowl.

"We've been here 50 years. Is this going to be our last year?"

While bar patrons can choose to go outside for a cigarette, Biamonte says that option isn't available to his customers.

"You can't go outside with your bowling shoes in the winter time. You'll slip, fall down and hurt yourself."

http://faac.ca/content/news/2005.02.07-1.htm


Study links kids' cancers to moms' exposure to pollutants

By Andre Picard Jan. 18, 2005
Most childhood cancers are likely caused by pollutants expectant mothers are exposed to during pregnancy, according to a new study. Those at greatest risk live close to busy roads and industrial areas, researchers found.
In particular, they found children born of mothers living near "emission hot spots" of particular chemicals were two to four times more likely to develop leukemia and other childhood cancers before age 16.
"Most childhood cancers are probably initiated by close, perinatal encounters with one or more of these high-emission sources," said George Knox, a professor emeritus at the University of Birmingham in Birmingham, U.K.
Emissions that appear to raise cancer risk the most include carbon monoxide created by burning fossil fuels (notably gasoline used by vehicles) and 1,3-butadiene, also a by-product of internal combustion engines. Researchers also looked at the effect of various other industrial and environmental pollutants, including particulate matter, nitrogen oxides (both of which are associated with oil burning), as well as dioxins, benzene, and benz(a)pyrene. These chemicals can be found in engine exhaust, and smokestack emissions from various industrial and refinery processes.
Dr. Knox said these chemicals -- many of which have been shown to be carcinogenic in animal tests -- are likely breathed in by the mother and passed on to the baby through the placenta. But he said that "effective direct exposure in early infancy, or through breast milk, or even preconceptually, cannot be excluded."
The study is published in today's edition of the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
The study did not deal with how the chemicals might trigger the growth of tumours. Instead, it focused on the location of children who developed cancer. To conduct the research, Dr. Knox and his team used detailed chemical-emission maps produced by the U.K. National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, and crossreferenced them with the home addresses of children who died of cancer.
There were a total of 22,458 childhood cancer deaths in Great Britain between 1953 and 1980. Eleven varieties of cancers were recorded, including leukemias, lymphomas, neuroblastoma and bone cancers.
Dr. Knox and his team found that the cancer deaths were concentrated near emissions "hot spots." In fact, children within a one-kilometre radius of a hot spot -- such as a large industrial plant or a major highway -- were two to four times more likely to die of cancer.
Some cancer experts, however, said the study was highly speculative and dismissed the notion that "most" childhood cancers are caused by exposure to pollutants.
Dr. Lesley Walker of Cancer Research U.K. said, for example, that there is a growing body of evidence that leukemia may be a rare response to a common infection. It is also well established that some cancers, such as neuroblastoma (a tumour that develops in the adrenal glands or certain nerves), can be caused by nutritional deficiencies, specifically a lack of folate. "This is a complex area to research -- not least because cancers in children are rare and some may have an underlying genetic basis," she said.
Almost 1,300 children are diagnosed with cancer in Canada each year, and about 230 die, according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Almost one-third of the cases and the deaths are due to various forms of leukemia.

The study is available on the web [click here]
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v4/sub/MarketingPage?user_URL=http://www.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%

2FArticleNews%2FTPStory%2FLAC%2F20050118%2FHCANCER18%2FTPEnvironment%2F&ord=1108668563175&brand=theglobeandmail&force_login=true


OHA Appears Before Senate Committee to Help Support National Plan for Mental Health and Addiction

    TORONTO, Feb. 17 /CNW/ - Ensuring a national action plan on mental health, illness and addiction is developed to help standardize care across the country is a key recommendation being made today by Ontario's hospitals at a panel discussion of the Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and
Technology, as Senators review responses to the issues and options presented in one of three reports recently produced by Senator Michael J. L. Kirby, and
members of the Committee.
    "The OHA commends Senator Kirby and the Senate Committee for their in-depth review of mental health, mental illness and addiction, and sees it as a positive step in profiling the major issues impacting the provision of these services in Canada," said Dr. Paul Garfinkel, President and CEO of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and Former Chair of the OHA Mental Health Working Group. "In order to truly enhance mental health and addiction treatment and care, we need to enhance health promotion, prevention and early intervention and continue to invest in community-based mental health care services.
    Key issues highlighted by Dr. Garfinkel included:
    -   The need for a single national action plan to ensure consistency in he quality of care provided across Canada, and the sharing of best practices
    -   The need for increased federal funding to improve research and development into the causes of mental illness and models of care in  treatment, as well as into the development of benchmarks to improve health system performance
    -   The need for a national information system to measure the mental health status of Canadians, evaluate policies and services, and share information
    The Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology is currently holding hearings to review the issues presented in the Senate Committee's report, and "to launch a public debate to enable Canadians to provide input on how the issues should be addressed."

For further information: Media Contact - OHA Public Affairs,    (416) 205-1348

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2005/17/c5592.html


Canadian Cancer Society Applauds Private Members' Bill for National Strategy for Cancer Research

    Research Strategy Important Part of Overall Strategy to Fight Cancer
    OTTAWA, Feb. 16 /CNW/ - The Canadian Cancer Society applauds today's introduction of a private members' bill in the Senate - The National Cancer
Strategy Act - calling for the creation of a national strategy for cancer research.
    "Canada is a world leader in cancer research and enhanced, coordinated investment will ensure that progress in cancer research continues, which will lead to fewer Canadians being diagnosed with cancer and fewer Canadians dying from the disease," says Ken Kyle, Director, Public Issues, Canadian Cancer Society.
    "A research strategy is an important part of an overall strategy to fight cancer in Canada. A Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control would also encompass prevention and improved screening, treatment, quality of life and access to services. Canada urgently needs this strategy as experts predict that new cancer cases will increase by 60 per cent over the next 20 years because of our growing and aging population."
    A Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control has been developed by more than 700 cancer experts and cancer survivors. As an active participant in the development of the Strategy, the Canadian Cancer Society has been urging all levels of government to implement and fund this important initiative.
    The private members' bill for a cancer research strategy was introduced by Senator J. Michael Forrestall of Nova Scotia. The bill calls on the federal Minister of Health to consult with the ministers responsible for health in each province and with charities involved in funding cancer research to develop a plan for a national cancer research strategy.
    The Canadian Cancer Society is a national community-based organization of volunteers whose mission is to eradicate cancer and to enhance the quality of
life of people living with cancer. When you want to know more about cancer, visit our website at
www.cancer.ca or call our toll-free, bilingual Cancer
Information Service at 1 888 939-3333.

For further information: please contact: Ken Kyle, Director, Public Issues, Canadian Cancer Society, (613) 565-2522, ext. 301; Rachel Brown, Communications, Canadian Cancer Society, (416) 934-5681

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2005/16/c5127.html


MLAs get look at smoking bill  -AB

CBC News Last Updated Feb 17 2005 07:57 AM MST
 EDMONTON – Conservative MLAs will get their first look at proposed no-smoking legislation Thursday, which is expected to contain provisions for designated smoking rooms.

Calgary MLA Dave Rodney will introduce the private member's bill during the next session of the legislature, and has said he won't discuss its contents until his caucus colleagues have seen it.

The bill is believed to be a compromise that would ban smoking in workplaces, but make allowances for ventilated smoking rooms in some businesses, including bingo halls and casinos.

But Les Hagen, with Action on Smoking and Health, says smoking rooms don't work.

"The region of York spent $160,000 annually just to monitor and inspect their smoking rooms, and at the end of the day, they found that three-quarters of them were in non-compliance with the legislation," Hagen said. "The circulation or ventilation was either inadequate or the rooms were overcrowded, and we believe that the situation wouldn't be any better here."

Hagen and other anti-smoking advocates are calling for a complete workplace smoking ban across the province.

Health Minister Iris Evans had initially proposed a province-wide ban, but eased off after Klein made it clear he doesn't support the move. While the premier believes steps should be taken to discourage people from starting to smoke, he opposes forcing bars and casinos to ban the habit.

He says individual municipalities should make the decision about whether to permit smoking in their communities. However, the Alberta Association of Urban Municipalities has asked the province to make a rule that everyone would have to abide by

http://edmonton.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=ed-smoking-ban20050217

 


MLA's anti-smoking bill jumping the gun? -AB

JERRY WARD, LEGISLATURE BUREAU

A rookie Tory MLA who wants a smoking ban in Alberta workplaces - with rules permitting designated smoking rooms - appears to have jumped the gun, critics say. Calgary Lougheed MLA Dave Rodney was before the all-Tory health policy committee yesterday explaining the ins and outs of his private member's bill, to be introduced when the legislature starts its spring session on March 1.

Rodney emerged from the two-hour closed-doors meeting saying the proposed ban is a work in progress.

"It's an evolution and we want to consult with Albertans more," Rodney said yesterday. "I don't know that my opinion matters that much. Honestly, I want to talk to my caucus more on what they think is appropriate.

"I wish I could tell you more, but there is no more to tell until I consult with my fellow colleagues."

He declined to say how his bill - and the manner in which it was floated over the weekend exclusively to a local media outlet - was received by other Tory MLAs.

"That's a confidential conversation," Rodney said.

Private member's bills are rarely proclaimed into law, even when a majority of MLAs support them. Rodney's bill is to be debated by all Conservative MLAs on Thursday.

"Perhaps there were one or two different things that could be drafted in the final (bill) and might be offered as differences when it comes forward to caucus," said Health Minister Iris Evans.

"We'll go forward to caucus and have more discussion."

Evans said she supports Rodney's proposed bill and his effort to, "build something that can be accepted by the broadest number of our MLAs."

Liberal health critic Laurie Blakeman said she thinks Rodney spoke publicly before getting the backing of the other 61 Conservatives in the legislature.

"I think a rookie MLA got out ahead of his process and now he's stuck and can't say anything more until they run it through caucus," said Blakeman, MLA for Edmonton Centre.

Evans said a government-endorsed bill on smoking in Alberta workplaces would not have been debated in the legislature this spring, so the route of using a private member's bill was seen as a quicker method to advance the debate toward a ban

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/News/2005/02/15/931434-sun.html

 


Sister sure seaman didn't kill himself

'My brother had too much to live for'
By JEFFREY SIMPSON / Staff Reporter Friday, February 11, 2005
A relative of the sailor from Halifax who went missing from HMCS Montreal in the Baltic Sea this week says she's convinced he wouldn't have committed suicide.
Leading Seaman Robert LeBlanc wasn't depressed and had no reason to take his own life, a woman who identified herself as the man's sister told this newspaper Thursday.
"My brother had too much to live for; we'll put it this way," said the woman, who didn't want her name published.
She declined to describe the relationship her brother had with his fellow sailors or comment on whether she suspected other people might have been involved in his disappearance.
"At the present time, I cannot answer that question," she said.
The navy said Wednesday that Leading Seaman LeBlanc, 24, was last seen having a cigarette at about 11:30 p.m. Tuesday in the breezeway on the port side of the ship, an enclosed area used as a smoking area.
But his sister said that's also unlikely.
"He's never put a cigarette up to his mouth before in his life," the woman said. "He's yelled at me for smoking, for God's sakes, so he's not a smoker."
Leading Seaman LeBlanc was reported missing when he failed to show up for duty as a night steward more than 90 minutes after he was last seen. Although there are two doors from the breezeway leading outside, everyone on board had been ordered to remain off the upper deck due to the risk posed by frozen sea spray. The command was broadcast over the ship's intercom, and signs were posted on all exits, the navy said. Conditions at the time were clear and calm.
Leading Seaman LeBlanc's sister said she's concerned about the information that has been made public about her brother.
"He's being portrayed as something he's not," she said. "The image of him is being brought out . . . the wrong way, and it's not fair, and he's not alive anymore to defend himself."
The unmarried man, whose parents live in Western Canada, was an experienced sailor who joined the navy in 2000 and had served on two voyages as part of the war on terror.
"He was a good guy," his sister said. "That's all I'll say."
She said she didn't want any further information about her brother or her family made public.
"I don't need the media coming to my door," she said. "My family doesn't want anything to do with the media.
"You guys are horrible at times."
Lt.-Cmdr. Denise LaViolette, a spokeswoman for the navy, acknowledged that officials erred in saying that Leading Seaman LeBlanc was smoking.
"It's our fault," she said. "The breezeway is a smoking lounge. We automatically assumed he was having a cigarette.
"That's the only place on board a ship people are allowed to smoke. There are very few non-smokers that normally hang around there."
The sailor was a non-smoker and didn't drink either, she said.
Two military police officers from the National Investigation Service will head to Poland from Halifax on the weekend to meet HMCS Montreal when it arrives in port, she said.
The navy urges the public and military personnel to report any information that may shed some light on what happened to Leading Seaman LeBlanc, Lt.-Cmdr. LaViolette said.
"If somebody thought he was depressive, we'd like to know. If somebody thought there might be some issues with crew members, we'd like to know. If somebody saw him fall, we'd like to know."
Lt.-Cmdr. LaViolette said investigators are keen to examine any possible scenario.
She wouldn't comment on whether anyone had raised concerns about the sailor.
"Even if I knew that, I wouldn't be able to tell you," she said.
If investigators determine the sailor's disappearance was the result an accident, the matter will be handed over to a board of inquiry, Lt.-Cmdr. LaViolette said.
"If their initial findings indicate that the death is of a suspicious nature, then the investigation would remain within (the military police's) purview," she said.
Leading Seaman LeBlanc had been transferred to HMCS Montreal from HMCS Iroquois in December specifically for the current NATO operation, the navy said.
The search for him was called off Wednesday after several ships and helicopters scoured the sea about 50 kilometres off the coast of Poland.
Lt.-Cmdr. LaViolette said the ship continued operations with the NATO fleet Thursday and will arrive in Gdynia, Poland, today as originally planned. At the time the sailor vanished, the warship had been at sea for three days after stopping in Denmark.

http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2005/02/11/fNovaScotia148.raw.html

 

* The port breezeway is an enclosed passageway from the Foscle (Front of the ship) to Top Part (the Middle of the ship) with an entrance into the ship within the breezeway. It is the only location on Halifax Class Ships to have a smoke. Most people don't wear a weather jacket out there.

 


Details of smoking- ban bill kept under wraps-AB

JERRY WARD, LEGISLATURE BUREAU Fri, February 18, 2005

Tory MLAs were yesterday given their first glimpse of a proposed smoking ban in Alberta workplaces that is expected to contain allowances for designated smoking rooms. Calgary Conservative MLA Dave Rodney is to introduce the private member's bill in the spring session of the legislature, and says he won't discuss its contents until his caucus colleagues have vetted it.

"It'll be public when we go to the house in early March," Rodney said yesterday. "That's all I can tell you right now."

The bill is portrayed as a compromise that would ban smoking in workplaces, but makes provisions for ventilated smoking rooms.

Health Minister Iris Evans had first proposed a provincewide ban, but backed off after Premier Ralph Klein threw cold water on the idea, saying he will not pursue such a measure. He has since permitted Evans to open up the debate on the issue among Tory MLAs.

Rodney is trying to get Tory MLAs onside with a private member's bill, but those are rarely proclaimed into law even with a majority of MLAs in support.

Evans said she supports Rodney's proposed bill and his effort to "build something that can be accepted by the broadest number of our MLAs."

NDP Leader Brian Mason says he intends to put forward a motion urging all MLAs to prohibit smoking in public buildings and indoor workplaces.

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/News/2005/02/18/934786-sun.html

 


Rookie Tory proposes smoking ban

Feb 14 2005

 EDMONTON (CP) - A rookie Conservative says he will introduce a private member's bill in the Alberta legislature next month that would establish a provincewide smoking ban, despite the long-standing opposition of Premier Ralph Klein.
Dave Rodney, member of the legislature for Calgary-Lougheed, said his bill will propose an end to smoking in workplaces, but with some allowances for special smoking rooms. Rodney was to explain details of the bill today to a government's health policy committee.
''What I'm hearing constituents say is they're very much for a smoking ban, as long as it's across the board, and that there is a provision for some kind of designated smoking areas,'' Rodney said.
Klein has said he will stay out of the argument while the government reviews its health policy.
The premier will be on vacation the next two weeks as the Rodney bill begins to work its way through committee and caucus.
Last month, Klein quashed a suggestion from Health Minister Iris Evans that Alberta adopt a workplace smoking ban.
Rodney, who is also chairman of the Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission and is the only Canadian to have climbed Mount Everest twice, said he drafted the bill in close consultation with Evans.
Government insiders believe the private member's bill is a way of fast-tracking legislation, side-stepping the arduous cabinet reviews that killed past attempts at a provincewide ban.
Anti-smoking advocate Les Hagen criticized Rodney's plan, saying smoking rooms or ventilated smoking areas still pose a health threat to workers, such as waiters and waitresses who would have to serve in the haze-filled rooms.
''The end result of smoking rooms is that some employees will be forced to work in those rooms,'' Hagen said.
Liberal health critic Laurie Blakeman, who had planned to table her own private member's motion in the legislature calling for a total ban, worried her motion would be ruled irrelevant in light of Rodney's bill.
''It's not a complete ban if it's a ban with a list of exceptions,'' Blakeman said. ''What are they playing at? How serious are we going to be about this?''
But the proposal to include designated smoking areas is winning some support from bingo and restaurant associations.
''That is the sort of solution that I think the charitable gaming industry can support,'' said Ian Taylor, executive director of Alberta Satellite Bingo, which broadcasts live games to dozens of bingo halls across Alberta.
Taylor was also to speak today at the government's health and community living committee.
He said he will warn that a complete ban without smoking rooms will force a sharp drop in business and bingos and charity casinos.

http://www.reddeeradvocate.com/portals-code/list.cgi?paper=107&cat=60&id=375080&more=

 


Bankruptcy growth slows: The calm before the storm?  -ON

    KITCHENER, ON, Feb. 18 /CNW/ - In statistics just released by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, consumer bankruptcies and proposals increased by a modest 1.9% in Ontario in 2004, and by only 0.3% in Canada in 2004. Despite these encouraging results, a local bankruptcy trustee warns that the number of bankruptcies may increase significantly in Canada in 2005.
    "We are expecting consumer filings in Canada to increase at a rate of 5% to 8% per year over the next two years" says Douglas Hoyes, a trustee with Hoyes, Michalos & Associates Inc., one of Ontario's largest consumer bankruptcy firms. "We consider 2004 to be the calm before the storm, particularly if interest rates increase significantly".
    Mr. Hoyes believes consumers benefited from improved employment performance in Canada and Ontario in 2004. "While Ontario bankruptcies increased more than the national average due to the delayed impact of events in 2003 such as SARS and a high Canadian dollar, the rate of growth slowed in the second half of the year."
    Ted Michalos, a trustee with Hoyes, Michalos & Associates Inc., is concerned that although growth has slowed in 2004, increasing debt levels will eventually result in the bankruptcy rate increasing again. "Household debt grew a staggering 9.6% in the first 10 months of 2004 and the debt-to-income ratio in Canada reached a record 109% in the third quarter of 2004. Given the continued dramatic increase in consumer debt levels and anticipated rise in interest rates, consumers will find it increasingly difficult to meet their financial obligations".
    Mr. Hoyes adds that "while almost one-third of our clients mention marital, family or health related problems as a primary cause of their financial troubles, a further one-third mention job loss or income reduction as a major contributor. However, the largest percentage of clients list high debt levels relative to their income as a key reason for filing a bankruptcy or proposal."
    More information on consumer bankruptcy trends can be found at
www.hoyes.com.
    Hoyes, Michalos & Associates Inc., one of Ontario's largest consumer bankruptcy firms, serves individuals and businesses from offices in Kitchener, Mississauga, North York, Cambridge, Guelph, Brantford, Hamilton, Leamington, Chatham and Windsor.

For further information: J. Douglas Hoyes at (519) 747-0660 or 1-800-472-7775, or by e-mail at doug@hoyes.com or on the web at
www.hoyes.com

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2005/18/c6063.html

 


McGuinty calls March 17 byelection

John Tory to seek seat once held by Eves

Keith Leslie Canadian Press Wednesday, February 16, 2005

TORONTO -- A provincial byelection on St. Patrick's Day in the Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey riding northwest of Toronto is a chance for voters to show Premier Dalton McGuinty they're angry with his Liberal government, opposition parties said Wednesday.

''I think it's a chance to send the McGuinty government a message that people are tired of broken promises,'' said NDP Leader Howard Hampton.

''And it's an opportunity for people to elect somebody who's actually going to be from the riding who'll represent them.''

Hampton was taking a thinly veiled shot at Toronto-based Conservative leader John Tory, who has been waiting for this byelection so he can seek a seat in the legislature and stop watching the proceedings from the sidelines.

Tory said the byelection would be a chance for voters to send a message to the McGuinty Liberals, adding he was pleased the vote


Posted at 12:21 pm by looped_ca
Make a comment

Actions speak lounder then Words

McGuinty calls March 17 byelection

John Tory to seek seat once held by Eves

Keith Leslie Canadian Press Wednesday, February 16, 2005

TORONTO -- A provincial byelection on St. Patrick's Day in the Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey riding northwest of Toronto is a chance for voters to show Premier Dalton McGuinty they're angry with his Liberal government, opposition parties said Wednesday.

''I think it's a chance to send the McGuinty government a message that people are tired of broken promises,'' said NDP Leader Howard Hampton.

''And it's an opportunity for people to elect somebody who's actually going to be from the riding who'll represent them.''

Hampton was taking a thinly veiled shot at Toronto-based Conservative leader John Tory, who has been waiting for this byelection so he can seek a seat in the legislature and stop watching the proceedings from the sidelines.

Tory said the byelection would be a chance for voters to send a message to the McGuinty Liberals, adding he was pleased the vote would give him a chance to honour his pledge to be in the legislature by the spring sitting.

''I appreciate the fact that Mr. McGuinty has called (the byelection) without any undue delay,'' said Tory.

''I'm sure he wasn't doing that to do me any favours, but I do appreciate the fact there hasn't been a long delay in calling the byelection.''

Tory said wasn't worried about being considered a parachute candidate in the riding, and said voters would respect his honesty for admitting he intends to seek a seat in a Toronto riding in the 2007 general election.

''I think they have good feelings about me, (and) I think they have good feelings, historically and today, about our party,'' said Tory.

''And I think they do have a lot of real big concerns about the Liberal government.''

Finance Minister Greg Sorbara was optimistic about the Liberals' chances in the byelection, even though they lost the previous one in Hamilton East to the NDP, and like Hampton, he couldn't resist taking a shot at Tory.

''We think that the people of Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey are tired of being used as a launching pad for leaders who don't plan on staying very long,'' said Sorbara.

''We think we have a shot at it.''

McGuinty called the byelection Wednesday, three weeks after former premier Ernie Eves quit to clear the way for Tory, who won the Conservative leadership in September.

Eves was pressured to resign by Conservatives who noted another party member had resigned a seat in 2000 so he could run in a byelection after he returned to public life and won the party leadership, succeeding Mike Harris.

Tory was acclaimed as the Conservative candidate this month although he doesn't live in the riding. The long-time party strategist and former head of Rogers Communications has never been elected to public office.

The Liberals intend to nominate local environmentalist Bob Duncanson as their candidate for the byelection at a meeting Thursday at Orangeville District Secondary School.

The New Democrats plan to nominate local teacher Lynda McDougall on Saturday as their candidate for March 17.

The Green Party, which finished third in the riding, ahead of the NDP in the 2003 general election, plans to nominate Ontario leader Frank de Jong as its candidate on Saturday.

http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/toronto/story.html?id=9d9db317-a4f1-470b-9ad2-417641422f81


Gene Linked to Heavy Metal Poisoning

February 16, 2005— 

WEDNESDAY, Feb. 16 (HealthDay News) — A gene responsible for spreading the toxic effects of cadmium, and perhaps other heavy metals, throughout the body has been identified by University of Cincinnati (UC) researchers.

The finding may help scientists develop a way to prevent cadmium toxicity in humans. Cadmium, which is present in cigarette smoke, soil and some plants, shellfish and seafood, is suspected of causing birth defects and lung and testicular cancer, as well as damage to the central nervous system, lungs and kidneys.

Studying low doses of cadmium in mice, the UC team found that a gene called Slc39a8 works to transport cadmium to the testes, resulting in tissue death.

"We suspect that cadmium at higher doses could be transported to other regions of the body via the Slc39a8 gene or another gene in this family. We know that humans carry the same gene and gene family. Thus, we have identified a target that could be used to prevent cadmium's toxic effects in human populations," study leader Dr. Daniel W. Nebert, a researcher at the Center for Environmental Genetics, said in a prepared statement.

The study will appear in the March 1 issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"We believe that the Slc39a8 gene could be responsible for the transportation not only of cadmium, but also of other nonessential heavy metals such as lead, nickel and mercury. Identification and characterization of this gene in mice is a significant breakthrough that will improve our understanding of how heavy metals actually cause toxicity and cancer in humans," Nebert said.

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about toxic chemicals.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Healthology/story?id=505102


Smoking Banned at City Parks in Logan, Hyde Park -UT

Feb 16, 2005 10:47 am US/Mountain
Lighting up at city parks in two Cache Valley communities will soon get you a ticket.
City councils in both Logan and Hyde Park approved smoking bans Tuesday.
Hyde Park Mayor David Kooyman said the new law was drafted to help the town secure a healthy community grant to fund park improvements and a trail system, and Logan Mayor Doug Thompson said the action was purely in response to citizen complaints about secondhand smoke and cigarette butts.
The Hyde Park ordinance bans smoking in all public parks, and the Logan Municipal Council decision makes tobacco illegal at the Logan Aquatic Center, Logan Skate Park and Fairview Park.
"Government certainly has a right to dictate their own facilities," said Kooyman, noting that the Clean Air Act already bans smoking inside public buildings. "This extends it from buildings to all facilities. I don't have a problem with it."

http://kutv.com/topstories/local_story_047124929.html


Stateline Smokers React Proposed Cigarette Tax Increase -IL

by Jarrett Dunbar February 16, 2005 - 1:00 pm - Rockford

Rockford, Illinois- During the State of the Budget address Wednesday, Governor Rod Blagojevich announced plan to raise the tax on cigarettes didn't shock stateline smokers.

"It's been increasing since I've been smoking," says Robert Keeton. "When I started, it was 55 cents a pack, and I'm still smoking today. Regardless of what he does, if you smoke, your gonna smoke all the time anyway."
States all around the country have been increasing the taxes on their cigarettes. The last time the cigarette tax was increased in Illinois was back in 2002, when it went from 58 cents to 98 cents. If the governor gets his wish, the tax will jump to $1.73 a pack. Stateline smokers think it's unfair the government continues to tax them.
"They're always trying to increase the price of cigarettes and they're always coming after the smokers," says Joe Grodecki. "If that's the way they are going to increase revenue, then it's a way to make revenue. Personally, I'm not a big fan of it."
The higher tax will increase revenue to the state, but it may have another affect. It could force smokers to give up the habit altogether.
"In time, I think will, especially if the rates keep going up and up and up," says Grodecki. "Right now, they're at 3.50-4 bucks a pack. A 75-cent increase is going to be about $4.50 a pack. It'll effect me some, but not too much."

http://www.wtvo.com/Global/story.asp?S=2957103&nav=0RePWSGG


Paris cigarette ban goes up in smoke  FRANCE
Jon Henley in Paris Wednesday February 16, 2005 The Guardian
They are a familiar sight in New York, Dublin and Rome. But it seems huddled groups of smokers puffing away outside bars and restaurants stand little chance of appearing on the streets of Paris.

The city council was yesterday forced to acknowledge that a voluntary scheme launched three months ago aimed at encouraging Paris's 12,452 cafes, bistros and brasseries to declare themselves smoke-free zones had been adopted by barely 30.

"It's early days yet," a spokeswoman said. "The idea is good and I'm sure it will catch on eventually. I think bars and restaurants just had other things to think about over Christmas and the new year."

But in a nation of unrepentant cigarette-lovers, others are less sure.

"It's a daft idea and it was doomed to failure from the start," Yves Bougeard of the catering industry union UMIH, told Le Parisien. "France's existing laws already force bars and restaurants to provide no-smoking areas. Surely that's enough? How can you ask customers to stop smoking when 43% of establishments in Paris also sell cigarettes?"

Under the scheme, devised by the city's deputy mayor in charge of public health, Alain Lhostis, cafes and restaurants can apply for a sticker issued by the Mairie de Paris bearing the words: Ici, c'est 100% sans tabac .

Last month Rome became the latest city to in effect ban smoking in public, outlawing tobacco in all indoor spaces unless they have separate smoking areas with continuous floor-to-ceiling walls and ventilation systems.

Offending smokers can be fined €275 (£190), and proprietors up to €2,000 if they fail to call the police when customers refuse to put out their cigarettes. The Irish Republic successfully introduced similar, though less stringent, legislation nearly a year ago, while smoking bans are common across the US.

The French remain a nation of dedicated smokers: according to the latest government figures, 32.2% of all 26- to 75-year-olds are regular consumers and the figure rises to 36.7% in the 12 to 25 age group. In the face of customer pressure, laws on smoking in public places are widely ignored in most cafes and restaurants.

Proprietors argue that banning smoking would amount to commercial suicide.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1415406,00.html

Different take in Africa's version of Guardian http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=197643&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news/

 


Peril of smoky pubs -UK

Rebecca Camber

SPENDING just 10 minutes in a smoky Manchester pub has the same effect on your lungs as smoking several cigarettes, according to health campaigners.
Pat Karney, head of the Greater Manchester Tobacco-Free Project, took to the pubs of Manchester to test how inhaling other people's cigarette smoke can affect you.
He was astonished after tests revealed that standing in a pub where five to 10 people were smoking for just 10 minutes had the same effect on your lungs as smoking several cigarettes.
When an expert carried out a carbon monoxide test in a smoky pub on Deansgate on Rachel Zammit - a stop-smoking adviser who has never smoked - he found her lungs had the same level of carbon monoxide as a heavy smoker.
Lungs

But in a pub that had banned smoking, the same test showed the level dropped to that of a non-smoker.
Coun Karney has now called for more pubs to ban smoking.
"We had very dramatic results between a Wetherspoons pub on Deansgate - a smoking pub - and Sinclair's Oyster Bar, which has banned smoking," he said. "It took just a few minutes for the lungs to feel the effects of second-hand smoke.
"Passive smoking can increase the risk of a heart attack or lung cancer by up to 25 per cent. What chance do bar staff in Manchester have of protecting themselves? As more pubs go smoke-free, ones that don't risk staff taking legal action for exposure to second-hand smoke."
Manchester University senior lecturer in public health, Dr Richard Edwards, who conducted the test, said: "Just 10 minutes in a bar, which wasn't even very smoky, made the lungs of a non-smoker the same as a smoker. It is very worrying, considering long-term exposure to such levels can cause serious damage."
The news comes after the Manchester Evening News launched a hotline to help smokers quit, in conjunction with Greater Manchester NHS services. If you want to quit, call 0800 328 8534 from 9am to 5pm.

http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/news/s/146/146237_peril_of_smoky_pubs.html


ACCC finds 'mild' cigarette advertising misleading -AU

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has found that tobacco companies have been misleading people for years about the effects of smoking "mild" and "light" cigarettes.

Anti-smoking groups have welcomed the finding and are now urging the consumer watchdog to take the tobacco companies to court.

British American Tobacco Australia denies its packaging is misleading consumers, but says it is happy to work with the ACCC and the Federal Government to consider alternatives.

Todd Harper, from Quit Victoria, says he has long believed that the terms "mild" and "light" have given smokers the wrong idea.

"There's no doubt that the use of descriptors such as "light" and "mild" has been very misleading for many smokers who have, in an effort to reduce the harm of smoking, switched to these brands," Mr Harper said.

"If they hadn't in fact switched to these brands, we think that many of these smokers would otherwise have quit smoking already."

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), after seeking legal advice, now agrees - it has concluded that the practice is misleading.

Jonathan Liberman, from the Victorian Centre for Tobacco Control, says the finding is a significant development.

"It's the first time that the ACCC has said that they, having considered the evidence, do regard the conduct of the tobacco industry as misleading," Mr Liberman said.

Legal action

Mr Liberman is now asking for legal action.

"We'd be hoping to see the ACCC take the tobacco industry to court under the Trade Practices Act, and we'd be hoping to see the tobacco industry held accountable for the harm that it's caused through this misleading conduct," he said.

"We think that the harm should be paid for by the industry rather than by individuals and taxpayers."

But John Galligan, from British American Tobacco Australia, denies the company has done anything wrong.

"I suppose you have to ask the public what they mean, about what they understand about "light" and "mild"," Mr Galligan said.

"These terms have been around for 50 years on some products and it depends what consumers themselves believes about them.

"Now some people believe that they refer to a particular health related concern. We've never made those claims."

Class action?

Almost one in five Australians smoke.

The Victorian Cancer Council says 95 per cent of smokers choose "light" or "mild" cigarettes, which could result in a large class action.

Mr Galligan says British American Tobacco would welcome a chance to go to court to prove it has not deliberately mislead consumers.

"We don't want to leave anyone under the impression that we believe we've done anything wrong," he said.

"But you know, policy progress takes a long time when you involve the courts."

He says tobacco companies are happy to discuss possible changes to packaging with the ACCC and the Federal Government.

Mr Liberman would rather see wholesale change.

"Actually the product itself needs to be regulated," Mr Liberman said.

"That is, what is allowed to be put into the product, the way it's engineered and then the decisions about how consumer information is to be provided, have to be made by an independent regulatory agency not by the tobacco industry."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/s1303341.htm

 


Feds, states get tough on Internet smoke sales -PA

By Patrick Burns Intelligencer Journal

Published: Feb 16, 2005 9:33 AM EST

LANCASTER COUNTY, PA - Warning: Not paying taxes on Internet cigarette purchases greatly increases serious risk of a fine and imprisonment.

That is the message the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue will send to Internet cigarette customers in 23 counties, including three people in Lancaster.

The smokers will receive letters demanding tax payments of $1.35 for each pack of cigarettes purchased on the Net

Stephanie Weyant, Department of Revenue spokeswoman, said the letters are meant to inform, not necessarily penalize.

http://www.lancasteronline.com/pages/news/local/4/12062


Liggett: Not guilty

9:20 AM EST Wednesday

After two weeks of trial and fewer than three hours of deliberations, a Miami jury returned a verdict in favor of cigarette manufacturer Liggett Group, ruling the company not responsible for the illnesses of a smoker.

The verdict, as described by Liggett counsel Clarke Silverglate & Campbell, rules the company not responsible for the throat cancer of a man who allegedly smoked the company's products for more than 40 years. The company was defending itself in the case of Martinez v. Liggett Group.

The trial was held in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court before Judge Gill Freeman, the Miami-based law firm added.

"The verdict confirms the strength of Liggett's defense in individual lawsuits," Clarke Silverglate partner Kelly Anne Luther said. "The jury evaluated all of the evidence in this case and concluded that the plaintiff's claims lacked merit."

In addition to Clarke Silverglate, attorneys Aaron Marks, Leonard Feiwus and Michael Rosenstein of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman of New York City, also represented Liggett in the trial. That firm is national counsel for Liggett Group, which is owned by Miami-based Vector Group (NYSE: VGR).

http://southflorida.bizjournals.com/southflorida/stories/2005/02/14/daily28.html

 


Bowler Gary stubs out his career

By MALCOLM FLETCHER  

The fall-out from the new no-smoking rule in bowls has started with the first leading player quitting the sport.

Gary Neal, who plays for Ford in the Furrows Shropshire Premier League, has decided to jack in playing.

But the decision of the 1999 County Junior Merit champion is not due to the ban, but the way it was brought in.

The 22-year-old - who describes himself as a '10 a day man' - said he could easily go without a cigarette on the green, but that was not the issue.

"I feel very strongly about this because I don't agree with the way the rule has been brought in," said Neal.

"Shropshire had seven delegates at the BCGBA annual meeting when the new rule was passed and they all voted in favour of the ban off their own bat.

http://www.shropshirestar.com/show_article.php?aID=29641

 



Posted at 12:06 pm by looped_ca
Comments (1)

Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Back room Jockeying, and Bans that change with Realities

Smoking rooms should be allowed -AB

Wednesday February 02, 2005

Jasper Booster — Regarding the proposed smoking bylaw: I believe there is a need for smoking rooms such as the one in the Downstream Bar.
People aren’t going to stop smoking because they are not allowed to do it inside anymore. Do we want crowds of smokers standing right outside the bars on Connaught? What about the tourists? I picture them choking their way through a wall of smoke outside the Astoria Bar on Friday evenings in the summer. Or outside the Atha-B. Or the Whistlestop.
The smoking room in the Downstream works really well - why change that? If it’s for the health of the staff - they don’t serve inside it. They don’t need to enter it at all until the next day by which time the ventilation system has dealt with the smoke and it’s “safe”.
Come on - are we really going to make them rip it out? That seems ridiculous. Besides, smoking may be a bad personal choice but it’s not illegal. Lots of people do it. If we don’t designate a place for them, they will do it themselves. Is that better?
-Val Young, Jasper

http://www.jasperbooster.com/story.php?id=140541


Donation is just a smokescreen -ON

RANDY COHEN ON ETHICS Feb. 7, 2005. 01:00 AM 

Q I am on the board of a geriatric health care institution that has been approached about accepting a contribution from a tobacco company.

Some board members believe we cannot take tobacco money. Others say cigarette companies are legitimate businesses.

I don't think accepting this donation would promote smoking: Few of our clients still smoke, and none is taking it up.

What do you say?

Anonymous, Toronto

A You should not accept this donation. Abetting the interests of a tobacco company conflicts with your avowed mission, health care, and thus betrays the trust of those who contribute to or work for your organization.

It is not possible to demand absolute purity from donors; no such money exists.

And there are grey areas, but tobacco is not one of them: in Canada, it kills 45,000 people a year. It is society's prime public health problem, the most preventable cause of death. Do you or does your organization really want to have a stake in the profitability of cigarettes?

While accepting this donation may not directly promote smoking, it would offer the tobacco company a mask of benevolence to conceal its primary aim: selling a toxic product.

Some of your board members may not see it this way, but the tobacco company certainly does; hence its interest in associating with you. Furthermore, your declining its donation in no way impedes its ability to do good works, only its ability to shine in your reflected beneficence.

If the tobacco company truly wants to help the elderly, rather than buff its image, it can always toss a paper bag full of crisp, hygienic and anonymous thousand dollar bills through your office window any time it wishes.

There is one great thing about a health care organization taking tobacco money: it is a solution that creates its own problem. It supplies all the horribly ill people you could ever want — and then provides money for treatment. The not-so-great thing — one can be too ironic.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177

&c=Article&cid=1107691265400


"Ironic" School Tobacco Program Gets Failing Grade -NS

By Staff Feb 8, 2005, 12:10

Halifax - Bill Estabrooks, NDP MLA for Timberlea-Prospect and NDP Education Critic, is calling on the Minister of Health Promotion, Rodney MacDonald, to go further in ending tobacco use in the province's schools.
"This is just so ironic," says Estabrooks. "Just days after some schools are re-instituting smoking areas, we have the Minister of Health Promotion announcing a program that helps students become more media savvy about tobacco advertising."
"That's just not enough. If school time is being used to
teach about tobacco advertising, why not work with students, parents, teachers, and health promotion experts to develop more effective smoking cessation and education programs for our schools?"
Estabrooks' comments follow media reports that several schools in the Annapolis Valley Regional School Board have re-instituted designated smoking areas.

http://www.halifaxlive.com/artman/publish/tobacco_020805_5551.shtm


Imperial Tobacco Canada to appeal court ruling

Wed Feb 9, 2005 05:22 PM GMT

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Feb 9 (Reuters) - Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. will appeal a court ruling granting class-action status to an anti-smoking lawsuit over the marketing of cigarettes as "light" and "mild."

A British Columbia Supreme Court judge ruled on Tuesday in favor of a man who wanted class-action status for his suit that alleges the tobacco maker labeled cigarettes to make them appear safer than regular cigarettes.

"This is a copy-cat suit, an opportunistic attempt to cash in on American-style litigation that in no way reflects the Canadian reality," Montreal-based Imperial said in a statement.

Imperial, which is a unit of British American Tobacco Plc., also wants the Canadian federal government added as a defendant in the case.

The company says the Canadian government "instigated and authorized" the development of low-tar cigarettes and encouraged smokers to use them in the 1970s.

http://reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=RA2X55OS2NFEYCRBAELCFFA?type=topNews&storyID=7582685


 Court documents on class action on light & mild -BC

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/05/01/2005BCSC0172.htm


No cigar for smokers' socials -BC

By Matthew Hoekstra Staff Reporter Feb 10 2005

City upholds its no-smoking bylaw against cigar club

Richmond council has upheld its no-smoking bylaw, butting out a local cigar shop's plans for smokers' socials.
Tom Orange, co-owner of the Steveston cigar and coffee shop Robusto, was trying to organize regular after-hours evenings for cigar aficionados in his store.
After bylaw enforcement officers informed Orange the city does not permit smoking in the store at any hour, Orange and business partner Noah Felgar took their case to council's general purposes committee Monday.
But councillors rejected the Robusto bid, approving a formal resolution to reconfirm the status quo of the city's Public Health and Protection bylaw, which prohibits operators of retail establishments from allowing anyone to smoke inside. The resolution will be formally voted upon next Monday, though the vote is a formality as councillors were unanimous in upholding the bylaw.
Robusto's operators assured council the socials would involve only consenting adults, not employees.
But Coun. Harold Steves said similar arguments had been made to council when the city was devising its no-smoking policy. He said the compromise made then was to still allow smoking on outdoor patios.
Mayor Malcolm Brodie said upholding the bylaw is a matter of public health.
"We have the longest lifespan of anywhere in the country; we're seen as one of the healthiest, if not the healthiest, communities in Canada. So I think that making smoking more permissive would be a step in reverse."
Brodie also said making an exception for Robusto would set a precedent. Operators of pubs, karaoke bars, legions, pool halls and restaurants could also demand the same exception be made for them.
"The problem is if you permit this activity for this group, there are many, many different industries and groups who will demand an equal type of treatment," Brodie said.
Brodie also pointed to Robusto's location as a problem. Residential suites are above its ground-level location. A few residents who live upstairs told council Monday they were opposed to the Robusto proposal, saying the smell of tobacco wafting into their homes isn't pleasant.
"If you have smoking inside the premises you cannot, in my mind, help but have smoke going to other premises-and those are residences," Brodie said.
A disappointed Orange called it a setback, adding he is examining his legal options. Cigar social nights will still happen elsewhere, he said, possibly on the patio of The Buck & Ear Bar & Grill.
"At the end of the day the City of Richmond has fought long and hard to get to a point where they're able to promote themselves as smoke free," he said.
"I think they've made it clear that this would be a regression for them, even though it may make sense to allow us to do this."

http://www.richmondreview.com/portals-code/list.cgi?paper=45&cat=23&id=373105&more=


'Disappointed' at exemption -ON

Smoke-Free coalition says council’s action is a ‘step backward’

By Ian McCallum Times-Journal Staff Monday February 14, 2005
The Smoke-Free St. Thomas-Elgin Coalition says it is “disheartened and disappointed” by St. Thomas council’s decision last week to grant an exemption to the city’s 100 per cent smoke-free bylaw.
In a letter sent Friday to Mayor Jeff Kohler and council members, chairman Laura Wall admits she was “surprised” council approved a motion to allow St. Thomas Bingo Country an exemption from the bylaw to regulate smoking in public places and work places.
She writes the action is a “step backward” as the March 1 implementation date approaches.
And while Wall “understands” the financial case presented by the corporate owners of Bingo Country in a deputation to council one week ago, she emphasizes “this bylaw is not about economics.”
“It’s about health,” Wall writes. “This includes the health of Bingo Country’s employees, volunteers and patrons. The bylaw was established to help protect the health of all, not just some.”
The exemption granted by council “bears a sense of irony,” notes Wall.
“Often the charities supported by bingo hall dollars promote health and physical activity.”
The strength of the city’s bylaw, adds Wall, is its commitment to the health of its citizens and its inclusiveness.
“There are currently 170 municipalities in Ontario with implemented, 100 per cent smoke-free bylaws that include bingo halls – no exemptions, no exceptions. So, it can be and is being done.”
Wall urges members to “recommit” to a 100 per cent smoke-free bylaw.
“Please remove this exception and go back to the original bylaw. Tobacco is still the largest cause of preventable illness and death in Canada and that’s what we can’t afford to lose sight of.”

http://www.stthomastimesjournal.com/story.php?id=143002


Anti-smoking advocate urges full ban  -AB

CBC News Last Updated Feb 14 2005 10:04 AM MST

Edmonton –One of Alberta's leading anti-smoking advocates urged politicians to extinguish workplace smoking altogether by rejecting such compromises like smoke rooms and ventilated areas.

In a presentation to members of the Alberta legislature Monday, Les Hagen, executive director of Action on Smoking and Health, said such measures would be costly and wouldn't provide uniform health protection.

"Ultimately workers are going to have to enter that room and they're going to be exposed to high levels of second hand smoke," Hagen told MLAs.

He also said small businesses would be hurt by any legislation that forced them to install separate or ventilated smoke rooms, estimating the cost to be $50,000.

A representative of the charity gaming sector also made a presentation to politicians. Ian Taylor argued that a complete smoking ban would hurt charities because fewer people would go to bingos and casinos.

Taylor said more than $175 million was raised for charities in 2003/2004. He speculated that about half of that would be lost if people could not smoke when they gamble.

Taylor said ventilated smoking rooms would be the preferred way to go.

"I think an option that provided for both smoking and non-smoking areas within bingo halls would be an acceptable issue from the perspective of the customers in those businesses and would protect the revenue that flows to charities in the province right now," he said.

Health Minister Iris Evans is working on provincial smoking legislation, which should be in front of the standing policy committee by the end of February and could be ready for a vote in the legislature by April.

Evans resurrected the idea of a province-wide ban on smoking last month but the suggestion was rejected by Premier Ralph Klein. The premier, who said he was worried about the business repercussions, later said he was open to having a debate on the subject.

A recent poll, sponsored by an anti-smoking group, found that the majority of Albertans favour a workplace smoking ban.

The Ipsos-Reid poll of 800 Albertans found that overall, 68 per cent would like to see smoking banned anywhere people work, including restaurants, bars, casinos and bingo halls.

Hagen says he expects the debate on a workplace smoking ban to be protracted.

"I think this is just the beginning of a debate and consultation process that could go on for many weeks, if not months."

http://calgary.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=ca_smokingban02142005


Tobacco bylaw may die -ON

Exemption moves Barwick to ponder motion

By Ian McCallum Times-Journal Staff Monday February 14, 2005

 Like the cigarettes it is designed to butt out, the city’s 100 per cent smoke-free bylaw may be snuffed out before its March 1 implementation date.
The Times-Journal has learned a member of St. Thomas council will introduce a notice of motion at tonight’s meeting to repeal the bylaw to regulate smoking in public places and work places.
The dramatic turn of events follows council’s decision one week ago to grant an exemption from the smoke-free bylaw to St. Thomas Bingo Country.
That move has generated a plea from the Smoke-Free St. Thomas-Elgin Coalition to council urging members to “go back to the original bylaw.” (See story on page 3)
Speaking to the T-J from his home Saturday, Ald. Cliff Barwick confirmed he will table the motion tonight and it will then be open for discussion by members during the Feb. 21 council meeting.
“My stand from the very beginning on this has been this is a provincial issue and not a local issue,” stressed Barwick.”It’s the province who should take action. And I’m 100 per cent in favour of a provincial statute. Let’s treat everyone the same and no one’s got any cause for complaint.”
Should council support Barwick’s motion, the existing bylaw would remain in effect until provincial legislation is introduced in May, 2006.
The current bylaw, amended in 2000, prohibits smoking in municipal buildings and some public places like shopping malls and supermarkets and in common areas of multiple-family residential buildings, hotels and motels. It also restricts smoking in workplaces, restaurants and bars.
“Why do we have to go through all this when the province is going to do it for us. I think the opposition to the bylaw now isn’t really so much the smoking issue as it is the issue it’s unfair that people who have businesses where smoking is a part of that business are now in competition with areas that don’t have the bylaw. It’s a bylaw that’s not fair.”
With licensed establishments and a recently opened bingo hall in neighbouring Central Elgin unfettered by smoking regulations, the city’s smoke-free bylaw will create a playing field that is not level, argues Barwick.
“The word that I’m getting (from bar owners) is we just want a level playing field. And that’s the least any law should be. Any law that discriminates is difficult to enforce. And this is going to be difficult to enforce if people perceive it as an unfair law.”
Council is scheduled to discuss enforcement of the bylaw tonight, specifically a report from clerk Wendell Graves dealing with a recommendation to enter into a short term contract with an independent security/enforcement agency to assist the city.
“I have a great deal of sympathy for those who are going to be enforcing this,” said Barwick, “because I believe they may meet with opposition, not on the smoking issue per se, but on the issue people perceive this to be unfair.”
Barwick stressed “the argument about smoking is a non-argument.”
“I respect the position of the members of council who may not have the same philosophy I do. But from the perspective of people in business, for the sake of equity and fairness, let’s wait for the province.”

http://www.stthomastimesjournal.com/story.php?id=143001


‘Betrayed by our own municipality' -ON

Smoking bylaw rapped by representative for licensed establishments

By Ian McCallum Times-Journal Staff  Tuesday February 15, 2005

A spokesman for licensed establishments in St. Thomas said Monday his group feels “betrayed by our own municipality” as a result of the city’s commitment to a 100 per cent smoke-free bylaw due to be implemented March 1.
But the bylaw has another major hurdle to clear Feb. 21 when council will be asked to repeal the legislation to regulate smoking in public places and work places.
Following through on his comments to the Times-Journal on Saturday, Ald. Cliff Barwick tabled a motion Monday to repeal the bylaw and instead wait for implementation of a provincial statute in May of 2006.
In a deputation to council, Manx Arms manager Craig Wilson argued council members “don’t understand our business” which at present comprises 35 licensed establishments in the city.
“We didn’t expect our own municipality to turn on us,” stated Wilson, who added the bylaw will not encourage smokers to kick the habit.
“You’re taking the real problem and tucking it in the closet.”
The biggest stumbling block to the bylaw will be enforcement, stressed Wilson.
“Why bring the liability on yourselves. I’m not going to tell my people to butt out, it’s plain and simple. There are too many personal agendas here. I don’t Continued from page 1
think this can of worms needs to be opened