Entry: Fears and Reality Need to be Seen Monday, January 03, 2005



Health Minister Marks New Year's Day by Congratulating Saskatchewan on Smoke-Free Status     OTTAWA, Jan. 1 /CNW Telbec/ - Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh marked New Year's Day 2005 by congratulating Saskatchewan on its new province-wide smoking ban, which takes effect today. The new law bans smoking in all enclosed public places, including bars and restaurants, and prohibits the use of designated smoking rooms. This legislation follows on the heels of similar bans in Manitoba and New Brunswick, which took effect in October 2004.
    "I'm very encouraged that provinces and municipalities are taking steps to protect Canadians from the dangers of second-hand smoke," said Minister Dosanjh. "I would like to congratulate Saskatchewan. This strong smoking ban sets a positive example for the rest of the country. Early this year Health Canada will launch a new round of anti-tobacco advertising which will target the effects of second hand smoke."
    Heather Crowe, a longtime advocate of smoke-free workplaces, also welcomes the new legislation. Heather never smoked a day in her life, but spent her career working in the hospitality sector. She now has lung cancer - a result of her exposure to second-hand smoke. Heather has been a vocal non-smoking activist, attending numerous engagements in municipalities working towards smoke-free by-laws. "I am delighted that smoking will now be banned in
all public places in Saskatchewan," said Ms. Crowe.
    Every year, more than 45,000 Canadians die from disease or illness caused by using tobacco and at least 1,000 are non-smokers. Cigarette smoke is the number one cause of visible indoor air pollution and second-hand smoke exposes people to cancer-causing pollutants. The financial costs associated with employee smoking are also significant. The most recent conservative estimates from 1995 show annual costs per smoking employee can be up to $2,565 per year due to increased absenteeism, decreased productivity, increased life insurance premiums, and smoking area costs. The most recent figures from 1991 estimate that smoking costs the Canadian health care system approximately $3.5 billion
every year.
    The primary goal of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy (FTCS) is to reduce disease and death among Canadians. It recognizes that the key to success is comprehensive, integrated and sustained action, carried out in collaboration with all partners and directed at Canadians of all ages. Federal, provincial and territorial Ministers of Health are committed to working together to reduce tobacco consumption in Canada.
    Health Canada has resources available to help workplaces go smoke-free, including "Smoke-free Public Places: You Can Get There" and "Towards a Healthier Workplace: A Guidebook on Tobacco Control Policies". "Smoke-free Public Places" offers hands-on, easy-to-use resources to help municipalities and communities through the various stages of planning, implementing and evaluating non-smoking by-laws and policies in public places in their community. The "Guidebook" is designed to help employees and employers who are preparing to create or strengthen tobacco control policies in their workplace.
    These and other resources on second-hand smoke and help on how to quit smoking can be found at:
www.GoSmokefree.ca or by calling 1 800 O-Canada     (1 800-622-6232).
Egalement disponible en français
 
For further information: Media Inquiries:  Paul Duchesne, Health Canada, (613) 954-4807; Adèle Blanchard, Office of the Minister of Health, (613) 957-0200; Tricia Geddes, Office of the Minister of State (Public Health), (613) 941-8081; Public Inquiries: (613) 957-2991; Health Canada news
releases are available on the Internet at
http://media.health-canada.net
http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/January2005/01/c9474.html


Holiday spirit eluding Liberal government-ON
 
Wednesday December 29, 2004
Seaforth Huron Expositor — One must wonder if the Christmas spirit is eluding those in power this year as the provincial government conspicuously punts its cash cows while it simultaneously boosts taxes for everyone who dares to dwell under the Ontario sun.
It is of interest to note the province -- that consistently points to the $5.6-billion deficit from the previous Progressive Conservative-led government as the rationale for a dizzying array of odd initiatives -- is nonetheless willing and ready to allow Ontarians to bring their own wine into restaurants meaning less revenue for restaurateurs.
The government -- soon to be famously -- is also taking the chance on losing kazillions in tobacco tax revenue by rolling out plans for a province-wide smoking ban in public places effective 2006.
Not only will the move give a huge boost to the black market, it will also spell the end to a steady stream of tobacco tax revenue.
The province is also anti snack food, to the point where elementary schools can no longer house vending machines that carry such risqué items as chocolate bars laced with nougat.
What does this mean? Students must purchase candy off school grounds and school associations have fewer opportunities to make money for programs no longer covered by tax dollars.
Amusingly enough, the province is going to be reviewing the possibility of cutting back on the hours posted by gambling establishments.
This manoeuvre would lead to fewer jobs and a weakened economy.
Meanwhile, Ontarians are now paying a health-care premium and some property owners, including horse ranch and condo owners, are seeing their property reclassified as commercial and, therefore, face spiraling property tax hikes.
All told, the past year of Liberal leadership has led those who once sought a kinder, gentler Ontario to ask whatever happened to their best of intentions.
One must also wonder why the Liberals continue to focus on balancing the budget when the former government showed it could not be done at the current level of services, depleted though they were.
Perhaps instead of echoing the words of Tiny Tim with the plea, “please sir, can I have s’more?” Ontarians should ask the provincial government to meddle less.
Indeed, perhaps it is time for Dalton McGuinty’s crew to focus on drawing more jobs into the province rather than wringing out the last possible penny from the pockets of every working Joe and Jane in the land.
The Clinton News Record

http://www.seaforthhuronexpositor.com/index.php?id=591


Owners told to call police

Wed, June 2, 2004

SMOKERS WHO REFUSE TO GIVE ID CAN'T BE CHARGED

By KEVIN CONNOR, TORONTO SUN

THE CITY'S new smoking bylaw has no teeth and isn't being enforced, bar staff say. Bar and restaurant staff who phoned the city's new smoking inspectors' hotline to report the bylaw was being broken were told to call the police.

"I was told to treat someone smoking in my establishment like you would a drunk and call the police. This is par for the course. It's the city," Vic Salerno, owner of Upfront Bar and Grill, said yesterday after calling inspectors to say the bylaw was being broken in his pub.

The city has assigned eight bylaw inspectors to enforce the smoking prohibition, which went into effect at midnight on June 1.

Other inspectors are supposed to enforce the bylaw as part of their daily routine.

But they aren't responding to calls.

"If we find someone smoking, they don't have to give us any ID like they would for the police. We can't charge them if we don't know their name," said smoking bylaw inspector John Coleman.

REFUSAL TO DO THE JOB

"If people want something done to stop someone from smoking they will have to phone the police and, honestly, I don't know if they would come."

Cops will not be enforcing the municipal smoking bylaw, said Toronto Police spokesman Const. Kristine Bacharach.

"It's the bylaw officers' job to enforce this bylaw, which doesn't appear to be thought through," Bacharach said.

A person who illegally lights a smoke is liable to be fined $255 -- a $205 fine, plus a $50 victim surcharge for the first offence. Repeat offenders could face fines of up to $5,000.

"There already is a lot less smoking in bars. Some folks are thumbing their nose at us but we will get to them," said Joe Mihevc, chairman of the Toronto Board of Health.

"We need to find a balance without being heavy-handed and let people get their heads around this.

"The best bylaws happen with education. There is a curve here and we will meet the curve."

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/06/02/482650.html


Health boss kicks up storm -ON

BUSY YEAR FOR GEORGE

By ANTONELLA ARTUSO, QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU CHIEFSun, December 26, 2004

IN THE PROVINCIAL Liberal government's first year in office, no cabinet minister was under the media microscope more than "Furious" George Smitherman. The Ontario health minister was given the herculean task of taming a system where annual inflation runs upwards of 5%.

His enthusiastic efforts to transform the system eventually led to the NDP-imposed nickname "Furious" George for his rumoured tantrums with hospital execs.

"I see that people are characterizing me like a pit bull," Smitherman told reporters.

"I maintain that my bark is worse than my bite."

Smitherman suggested he was more "poodle" than pit bull. (A good thing since his government is ordering all pit bulls leashed and neutered.)

Smitherman's attempts to curb spending set off the province's hospital cleaners, who were not amused when he mused they could be paid less.

NOSE-TO-NOSE OVER DEAL

Hospital CEOs were told to balance their books, or else, and to stop building "Taj-ma hospitals."

The province's doctors went nose-to-nose with Smitherman over a derailed compensation deal.

He also suggested his coming provincewide smoking ban would take on private clubs and Legion halls, setting off smoker alarms across the province.

Finally, the health minister banned and then unbanned fresh sushi.

All in all, a busy year for the surprise standout in Premier Dalton McGuinty's cabinet.

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/12/26/797177-sun.html


All-out smoking ban believed excessive -ON

Regarding the letter, Expand smoking ban, (Dec. 26):

I have serious doubts whether J. M. Armstrong's point resonated with many of your newspaper's readers. Being a non-smoker myself, I believe my standpoint to be unbiased.

To refresh Armstrong's memory, the reason behind banning public consumption of beer or liquor is that alcohol is a controlled substance. As most people have seen others under the influence of alcohol behaving badly, this needs no further justification. Alcohol consumption in public leads to general disobedience, which can lead to riot.

I have yet to see any substantiated cases of disorderly conduct resulting from smoking tobacco.

I am wholeheartedly in support of smoke-free family restaurants, which children frequent. I feel that the smoke ban in relation to bars and taverns, and all pubic areas as suggested by Amstrong, is draconian and opens up the municipal, provincial and federal governments to another human rights debacle.

E. Kwan
Sarnia

London Free Press


Melfort hotel lays off workers, fears smoking ban will hurt business

Broadcast News December 29, 2004

MELFORT -- A co-owner of a hotel in Melfort fears the upcoming province-wide smoking ban could cut her business by 60 per cent.

Waneta Goldstein at the Chances R Hotel says she's giving early notice to two employees so they can take full advantage of their employment insurance.

Starting Jan. 1, smoking will be banned in all indoor public places, including restaurants and bars.

Goldstein says if business is better than expected, she'll rehire the two workers.

Lilian Campbell -- one of those facing a layoff -- says she understands the move by her employer, but finding a new job won't be easy at this time of year

http://www.canada.com/search/story.html?id=58a8d9c9-3523-438e-a7d8-2ac79247e021

 


Distributor doubts tobacco tax revenue estimates-OK

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) -- A Sapulpa tobacco wholesaler says revenue projections from Oklahoma's new tobacco tax are inflated because of several exception in tribal tobacco compacts.

Standard Distributing sales manager Rick Bahlinger says when states raise cigarette taxes, smokers tend to switch to Internet sales or tribal smoke shops.

But Governor Brad Henry's chief compact negotiator says officials considered those exceptions when figuring the impact of State Question 713.

State Finance Director Scott Meacham says many of the tribal exceptions will go away for tribes as soon as state officials and the Creek Nation agree on a new compact.

The Creeks are one of the state's major tribal sellers.

The new law that resulted in a net tax increase of 55 cents on a pack of cigarettes went into effect yesterday.

(Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

http://www.kokh25.com/uploads/local/oklahoma_ok/20d82718.shtml


Analyst predicts tobacco decision

A decision on whether the government can pursue $280million in damages from cigarette makers using federal racketeering laws could come this month, an analyst said.

Prudential's Robert Campagnino predicts the decision on whether the government can attempt to seize the profits in its ongoing trial will come Jan. 11.

Campagnino figures the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia for the past three months has been averaging 54 days between oral arguments and issuing its opinions. The arguments on the amount of damages were made Nov. 17, putting the date at Jan. 10, a Monday. But the court typically releases opinions on Tuesdays or Fridays, making the next day more likely.

The longest the court has taken to issue an opinion was 94 days, which would put the release date on Feb. 18.

The trial resumes Thursday after a holiday break. The Justice Department contends the industry engaged in a five-decade conspiracy to deceive the public about the health hazards of cigarettes.

http://www.courier-journal.com/business/news2005/01/02/D1-cool02-3248.html


Tobacco Tax -KS
AP
State lawmakers aren't very optimistic that the public will support increasing tobacco taxes to pay for expanded health care coverage. Governor Sebelius wants to raise 50 million dollars to provide health care to 30,000 poor adults and 40,000 children. It would also subsidize health insurance for low-paid workers. To pay for it, Sebelius wants to up the state's cigarette tax by 50 cents to a $1.29 per pack. It would also increase taxes on chewing tobacco and other products. But House budget committee chairman Melvin Neufeld, a Republican from Ingalls, rates the chances of a tobacco tax increase as ``zero.'' He and others say the November elections showed votersdon't want higher taxes.

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/1316536.html


Smoke ban sparks fear for swimmers

02jan05

SMOKERS yesterday were coming to terms with the new ban on lighting up in many public places, including between the flags on patrolled beaches.

But Surf Life Saving Queensland urged smokers not to stop swimming between the flags.

There was concern that people might mistakenly think they could not smoke anywhere on patrolled beaches.

The laws which came into effect yesterday prevent beachgoers from smoking only between the red and yellow flags – and 50m out to sea.

"We want to remind people that the flagged areas are the only place to swim," said Surf Life Saving Queensland operations manager Peter Dawes.

"We absolutely do not want to see people choosing to visit an unpatrolled location simply so they can smoke."

Queensland Cancer Fund manager of prevention and early detection, Susan Greenbank, said she believed most people were law-abiding citizens who would be happy to follow the rules.

"If it means moving outside the flags to have a cigarette, they will do that," Ms Greenbank said.

She did not find any smokers when she visited Main Beach at Southport on the Gold Coast yesterday, although there were plenty of cigarette butts in the sand.

She said that when all the new anti-smoking laws were implemented – by July 1 next year – they would have a huge impact on the health of Queenslanders.

The Queensland Cancer Fund conducted research on attitudes to the new laws and found that more than 70 per cent of people were in favour of the smoking restrictions.

As well as the between-the-flags ban on beaches, people now are not allowed to smoke within 10m of a playground; within 4m of an entrance to a commercial building; at artificial beaches including Brisbane's South Bank, Redcliffe and Cairns; in any major sports stadium; and in at least one-third of the indoor area of licensed premises.

http://www.thesundaymail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11830203%255E2765,00.html


The twenty issues of 2005 -SC

Posted on Sat, Jan. 01, 2005

SPURRIER AND USC:

Can Steve reach the heights that Lou failed to scale?

Football program in disrepair. Huge name with storied background lured to deliver big-time achievements. Frenzied fans counting down the minutes to opening day.

Yes, 1999 was a year to remember.

So much so that USC will do it all over again.

The Gamecocks have replaced one coaching legend with another, luring Steve Spurrier to Columbia to replace Lou Holtz.

Holtz accomplished much during his five seasons at USC but failed to reach the lofty heights so sought after by the school.

So Spurrier is in, and with him comes a freewheeling offensive style that will be a 180-degree turn from Holtz’s conservative — and that’s the nicest word we could think of — approach.

So the offense will be fun, as will Spurrier’s often sharp candor.

But will he win? Well, that’s the seven-year, $1.25-million-per-year-guaranteed question waiting to unfold.

RESEARCH PARK

USC revving up work on ‘economic engine’

Work is expected to begin in February on the Horizon Center, site of two five-story buildings that will anchor USC’s new research campus.

The buildings, about 125,000 square feet each, will sit along Blossom Street on the block bounded by Main, Wheat and Assembly streets. Developer Craig Davis hopes to open the buildings in the third quarter of 2006 at a cost of around $40 million.

Davis said he hopes to announce some business partners during the first half of this year. Meanwhile, USC president Andrew Sorensen continues to talk about a courtship with a Fortune 500 company.

Supporters of the research campus believe it will become an economic engine for South Carolina and its capital city. The 5 million-square-foot campus will consist of laboratory and office space, mixed-use retail, recreation areas and affordable housing, Sorensen said.

SANFORD’S FUTURE

Popular governor says he’ll seek term No. 2; the question is who will rise to challenge him.

Although Gov. Mark Sanford is only halfway through a four-year term, much of the 2005 political talk will center on his 2006 campaign for re-election.

Sanford, a Republican, has said he will seek a second term. As of July, he had more than $2 million in his campaign account. That, combined with his steady popularity among voters, is likely to scare off most challengers.

Democrats will field a candidate, but who it will be remains unknown. And, although unlikely, it is possible that a Republican will challenge Sanford in a primary.

Sanford remains vulnerable over his inability to guide legislative priorities through a Legislature controlled by Republicans.

This year, he has another ambitious agenda, including a major income tax cut and a plan to offer tax credits for parents to send their children to private schools or better public schools.

If neither passes, some of Sanford’s perceived invincibility could wear off.

U.S. SENATORS

Graham takes the spotlight as the 109th Congress convenes; DeMint’s key issues also at top of GOP list.

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is roaring into the 109th Congress, which convenes next week for a two-year run.

He is on the Sunday talk shows explaining his plan to reform Social Security. His editorials are printed in newspapers around the nation. He is on the front of those newspapers opining on changing how lawsuits are filed and on the war in Iraq.

Entering his third year in the Senate, the quick-tongued Graham has positioned himself as a conservative willing to buck the Bush administration publicly.

As for U.S. Sen.-elect Jim DeMint, R-S.C., his key issues — Social Security reform and tax reform — sit at the top of the GOP agenda for 2005 and 2006.

That may help the inherently quiet politician distinguish himself among his fellow freshmen. His first tasks, though, are to build a staff and open field offices across the state.

VILLAGE AT SANDHILL

The heart of the Northeast’s giant retail complex is expected to open this year, but questions remain about the market mix.

Over the next year, the 300-acre Village at Sandhill development in Northeast Richland will have staggered openings. The Town Center, the heart of the shopping complex, is expected to open in August.

The first businesses — Rhodes, Cost Plus World Market and Plex Indoor Sports — opened in November.

The 16-screen Eastern Federal Theater, a major tenant, hopes to open before the “Star Wars Episode III” debut May 19.

Town Center is expected to be home to a number of retailers entering the Columbia market for the first time.

Things to watch: Will Developer Alan Kahn get the upscale mix he hopes for, and will any established retailers relocate to the Village.

HOSPITAL GROWTH

Local medical facilities are investing millions in ambitious growth plans.

Columbia-area hospitals will continue their expansion plans this year.

A state hearing is expected in February on Providence Hospital Northeast’s plans to launch a $58 million expansion that will add 135,000 square feet of space and 50 acute-care beds. If approved, the expansion is expected to be completed in 2007.

In October or November, Lexington Medical Center is scheduled to complete a $145 million expansion. However, part of the project, a $5.6 million heart surgery unit — is being challenged by competing hospitals.

Palmetto Health will continue with its plans to spend up to $140.4 million to build Palmetto Health Baptist Parkridge, a full-service hospital with 84 beds near its new offices at I-26 and Lake Murray Boulevard. State approval of the project is pending.

Palmetto Health will continue building an $80 million heart hospital at the Palmetto Health Richland campus. That facility is under construction.

DOWNTOWN LIVING

A residential building boom will be changing the look of downtown in 2005.

Downtown Columbia residents can look forward to new neighbors as work continues in 2005 on these projects:

Developer Ben Arnold’s Renaissance Plaza project at nearby Lady and Pulaski streets is offering 17 live-work town houses priced from $375,000 to $450,000 and 60 condominiums priced from $180,000 to $350,000.

Another developer, Wade Caughman, promises to restore most of the dense trees and foliage he cut down on the stretch of the Three Rivers Greenway adjacent to Congaree Park, the 53-home upscale riverfront development he is building in West Columbia.

Caughman also is developing the historic Middleton Building, at the foot of the Gervais Street Bridge, and the surrounding 3.85 acres into 54 upscale residential town houses and condominiums called The City Club.

Housing is also likely for at least part of the Bull Street mental health property.

LEXINGTON COUNTY GROWTH

More houses, more headaches. Lexington County leaders will look for answers and consider one plan that would be the first of its kind in the state.

Lexington County, grappling with its rapid growth, could become the first South Carolina County to impose an impact fee on new homes and businesses, under a 1999 state law.

Lexington County Council is studying the issue as a way to pay for new infrastructure — such as the county’s $16 million Judicial Center, new roads or firehouses.

The county is one of the fastest-growing in the state, with more than 2,000 homes built most years. An impact fee — a fee added to the cost of new homes or businesses constructed in the county — could mean a property tax cut for current residents.

The biggest issue in deciding whether to impose an impact fee this spring, county leaders said, is determining which projects the law allows the fee to finance — which means the county may be lobbying for changes at the State House.

SCHOOL FUNDING

A ruling is likely in a decadelong school funding case that could have far-reaching implications for public education.

Look for a ruling with potentially sweeping implications for South Carolina schools sometime in mid-2005.

Judge Thomas W. Cooper Jr. heard closing arguments in the 16-month school funding trial in early December and has given both legal teams that argued the case a March 1 deadline to submit an outline of why he should rule in their favor.

An administrator who schedules trials before circuit court judges has promised Cooper he’ll be given extra time to review the court record and research rulings in similar cases elsewhere.

Eight rural school systems in eastern South Carolina are suing the Legislature in a dispute over how state government underwrites its share of the cost of providing a public education.

The lawsuit, which took a decade to get to trial, has raised fundamental questions about poverty, education reform and how the state pays for schools.

But whatever Cooper’s decision, it will be appealed to the state Supreme Court, attorneys on both sides and Cooper agree

FIXING THE NEIGHBORHOODS

Columbia shifts its focus to long-neglected in-town neighborhoods, a big-budget project with many questions and challenges.

The city of Columbia’s funding priorities slowly are shifting from the Congaree Vista to the redevelopment of long-neglected in-town neighborhoods.

This year, the city faces big decisions and is likely to earmark major money for such projects.

The East Central City Consortium has drafted a master plan for redeveloping five clusters of neighborhoods from Two Notch Road to Blossom Street east of Harden Street, plus Rosewood’s South Edisto Court neighborhood.

The city will have to work through regulatory barriers and find funding to begin implementing the plan. The first phase is estimated to cost $103 million.

Also, the city is planning to fund the creation of a master plan for land-use development in north Columbia. Finally, construction is under way on mixed-use developments where the former Saxon Homes and Hendley Homes subsidized housing projects were razed.

JOBS, JOBS, JOBS

South Carolina is expected to see a slightly higher job growth rate in 2005, as it struggles to fully climb out of a recession.

If job growth continues as expected in 2005, South Carolina may finally say goodbye to the last recession.

Total nonfarm jobs peaked at 1.9 million in June 2000, then fell to a low of 1.76 million in June 2002. Jobs have been growing slowly since; last year’s rate was just more than 1 percent, or about the rate of population growth.

USC economist Don Schunk predicts the number of jobs will increase 1.6 percent, enough to result in true growth.

South Carolina rang out 2004 with a rush of economic news. Vought Aircraft and Global Containment Systems announced plans to create hundreds of jobs in Charleston and Aiken, respectively. The Savannah River Site, meanwhile, said 2,000 workers could lose their jobs in the next two years, as the site winds down production of highly radioactive plutonium used in nuclear weapons.

S.C. MILITARY BASES

The state waits to hear about the future of its eight military installations.

The future of South Carolina’s eight military installations and the 121,000 jobs that depend on them will be known in May when the Defense Department’s budget-cutting ax falls.

Up to 30 percent of the nation’s military bases could be closed in the next round of shutdowns under the Base Realignment and Closure Act, or BRAC. Officials say that large number means no base is immune to threat of closure.

In the Midlands, business and government leaders are making their best cases to keep Fort Jackson, Shaw Air Force Base and McEntire Air National Guard Station open.

South Carolina lost an Air Force base in Myrtle Beach and a Navy base in Charleston to previous base closings.

TORT REFORM

Lawmakers are set to make big changes in whom you can sue, and how.

State lawmakers are likely to make big changes in where and how lawsuits are brought and how large damage awards can be.

Business leaders and many Republicans say the state’s laws are too friendly toward plaintiffs and bad for business.

Advocates for changing the law want to crack down on a plaintiff’s ability to “venue shop,” or file suit in a county where juries award large payouts.

They also want to limit the time in which a lawsuit can be filed and change the rules on who can be sued when more than one defendant is involved.

One bill, dubbed the “Business Protection Act” already has been filed. It is expected to fly through the House, but it could get bogged down in the Senate.

Still, the issue has more momentum this year than in the past.

TAX REFORM

The state still will be taking your tax money. It might just be doing it in a different way.

Taxes — and not just cutting them — again will be a hotly debated issue in the General Assembly this year.

Gov. Mark Sanford has made cutting the personal income tax a top priority. Lawmakers have their own ideas. Some examples:

A bill Sanford recently vetoed would have prevented local governments from raising property values more than 20 percent during reassessments. Expect a similar version to come up again.

Lawmakers also might try to revive the Quinn-Sheheen plan, which proposed raising the state sales tax while cutting property taxes. The plan lost some steam with the June primary defeat of House Majority Leader Rick Quinn, R-Richland.

An increase in the cigarette tax is a potential dark horse issue this session, with the state Chamber of Commerce supporting a hike to help small businesses pay for employee health care.

STATE BUDGET

The picture brightens for the state’s budget, but don’t expect a spending spree.

For the first time in five years, lawmakers aren’t feeling glum about the state budget forecast.

About $350 million more is expected for the 2005-06 fiscal year, which begins July 1, and there’s no shortage of opinions on how to spend some $6 billion.

Bolstering law enforcement, controlling state health costs and shoring up education funding are leading issues for Republicans and Democrats alike.

Gov. Mark Sanford’s executive budget, which details all state spending and proposes targeted cuts, should raise a few hackles in the General Assembly.

Lawmakers also may opt to face some unpleasant realities by setting aside money for cost-of-living adjustments for state retirees. The system likely will be stretched too thin by 2006 to keep doling them out.

So, while prospects for the next budget are not as gloomy as in recent years, don’t expect a spending spree. The state has plenty of catching up to do.

HEALTH CARE REFORM

Federal change could affect how the state provides health insurance for the poor, elderly and children.

Medicaid costs, the fastest growing part of the $6 billion state budget, will be a dominant issue in the Legislature.

Changes in the program — which provides health insurance for the poor, elderly and children — could come at the federal level, which would have an undetermined impact on the state.

Lawmakers will try to hold down costs and boost the reimbursement rates, while resisting tax hikes to pay for the program.

At the same time, the governor and lawmakers will take another run at saving money by restructuring state health agencies.

Their goal is to eliminate waste caused by duplication of services to patients, to eliminate certain boards and commissions and have the health agencies answer to a head appointed by the governor with the Legislature’s consent.

HOMELESSNESS

On the agenda for city and community leaders: gathering more accurate information about homelessness and trying to find a long-term solution.

A series of summit meetings on homelessness in the city of Columbia continues in January.

The most pressing need for service providers, along with city and county leaders, is to identify a permanent site for a homeless shelter.

The Beth and Lou Holtz Winter Shelter will remain at its Hampton Street location for another year, after its lease was extended in December. Officials say that bought them some time to find a solution, but the pressure is still high to develop a long-term plan.

The notion of a joint, one-stop homeless center still is at the forefront of the discussion, even though an effort by business leaders to develop such a facility on Shop Road encountered neighborhood opposition.

Also in January, the Midlands Area Consortium of the Homeless launches a count of the homeless to finally give leaders an accurate picture of the problem’s scope.

NORTHEAST CONGESTION

Some want Richland County to put the brakes on new construction while it figures out how to fix its overloaded roads. Will the idea fly?

Figuring out how to pay for widening ever-more congested roads is an issue awaiting Richland County planners and the County Council in 2005.

The issue of traffic congestion — most at the forefront in the Northeast, but growing in other areas as well — is reaching a head. Some have suggested a moratorium on new houses or businesses until a solution is found.

“Something has to be done,” said planning commissioner Norman Jackson, who pitched the idea of a moratorium. Traffic makes it hard for emergency vehicles to navigate and means long wait times for commuters, he said.

But some opponents have said a moratorium would drive up the cost of housing.

Enacting new fees or increasing existing ones to pay for the work is certain to be an unpopular idea with many residents.

Others, such as planning commissioner Barbara Wyatt, agree with a moratorium for a few months. But a long-term one would “cripple the economy in Richland County,” Wyatt said.

YOUTH VIOLENCE

Several high-profile shootings of teenagers galvanized the community in 2004. Leaders plan to continue several efforts in the coming year to try to tackle the problem.

Leaders in 2005 face the challenge of trying to curb youth violence, an issue spotlighted tragically last fall by two shootings that left three teens dead.

Columbia Mayor Bob Coble is pushing for a statewide gang summit early this year that would bring together local community leaders to discuss the issue of gangs and how best to combat them.

The Greater Columbia Community Relations Council, which holds monthly discussions on curbing youth violence, also has called for a summit.

Meanwhile, some are pushing for legislation. A prefiled bill focuses on the criminal activity of gangs. It seeks to define a gang member, a criminal gang and what constitutes gang activity. But some legal experts question whether that legislation is necessary, and point to constitutional questions.

STATE OF THE ARTS

Two key cultural institutions are rebounding, but the picture still includes challenges.

Two important cultural institutions began rebuilding in 2004, but both have more work to do.

Karen Brosius, who had worked for 20 years with the Philip Morris Co., took the helm of the troubled Columbia Museum of Art. The museum fired its last director after only 11 months and has had many budget shortfalls; important positions had been vacant.

After a year, the museum is in the black and all the positions have been filled. But Brosius will still have to put the museum on more solid financial ground, attract more visitors and increase the museum’s scholarly work.

Since he became director of the Cultural Council of Richland and Lexington Counties in May, Andy Witt has mended fences and improved the professionalism of the agency. The group once raised about $700,000 but is now raising less than half that.

Under Witt’s leadership the council is getting back to raising money and becoming a voice for all arts groups. This year will be a test of whether the council can get back on track.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/10541762.htm


Police seek male suspect in woman's attack, rape
Oakland Park -FL
A woman sipping coffee and smoking a cigarette on her patio early Friday morning was attacked, choked and raped by a man who is still on the loose, the Broward Sheriff's Office said.
The victim, 56, was following her normal routine about 6 a.m. at her home in the 800 block of West Oakland Park Boulevard, leading detectives to think the attack was planned in advance.
The attacker, described as a black man about 5-foot-7, 140 pounds dragged the victim upstairs and threatened to kill her if she called police. She called her daughter, who called the Sheriff's Office.
Anyone with information can call Crime Stoppers at 954-493-8477, and could be eligible for a cash reward.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-c3bdig01jan01,0,241661.story?coll=sfla-news-broward


Big and Little Tobacco expected to fight over legislation -VA

RICHMOND, Va. Big and Little Tobacco are likely to fight again during the 2005 General Assembly session that convenes this Thursday.

At issue is upcoming legislation that attempts to close a so-called loophole in the industry's 1998 Master Settlement Agreement with the states.

Major tobacco players passed on the costs of this settlement to smokers by raising cigarette prices.

 Jan 2, 2004But to keep non-participating manufacturers from getting a price advantage -- the states demanded they make payments into escrow accounts.

 Those funds would also be used to cover future claims. If unused, they would be refunded in 25 years.

The states and the tobacco giants say the gap in the agreement permits small companies that only do business in a few states to get back some money almost immediately.

Smaller companies say Big Tobacco is trying to stifle competition.

http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=2754752


Lighters banned on U.S. airliners-US
'Intelligence Reform' legislation could
even lead to prohibition on matches

Posted: January 1, 2005
7:00 p.m. Eastern

Smoking between flights is about to get a little more difficult.

Starting next month, the Homeland Security Department is banning all cigarette lighters beyond airport checkpoints.

The new prohibition takes effect Feb. 15, but don't be surprised if you get stopped before then, say Transportation Security Administration officials.

The ban was mandated by Congress in the massive and controversial Intelligence Reform Bill – a gigantic piece of legislation not read by a single member of the House or Senate before it was passed last month and signed into law by President Bush.

For smokers, the news could get even worse. The TSA is also considering banning matches on flights. No decision has been made, according to one TSA official who spoke on condition of anonymity. But if a ban is enacted, it isn't clear how screeners would detect matches, short of a time-consuming physical search.

Some question how effectively a ban on lighters, and particularly on matches, could be implemented.

"In some cases it may be difficult to enforce," said David Stempler, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Air Travelers Association. "Many won't show up on X-rays."

Some airports – Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta and Denver, for example – have smoking lounges or areas that could be equipped with lighters similar to car lighters, Stempler said.

But more likely is that airport areas beyond the security checkpoints will become de facto non-smoking zones, officials said. Some airports, including Dallas/Fort Worth, ban smoking everywhere inside the terminals.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42205


Tillery's new suit is obscene

Sunday, January 02, 2005

To the editor:

First, thank you for your excellent, informative and unbiased news articles.

However, why am I not surprised that the infamous Madison County, Ill. is in the news again? This new lawsuit (Tillery's firm sues big tobacco again, Dec. 29) is obscene and would be an insult to any court system in our country. I wonder if the Kruegers and their attorneys can be sued for filing a frivolous lawsuit a second time, after requesting the case be dismissed "without prejudice" the first time?

I wonder how Rebekah Krueger can live with herself, knowing that she is using her husband's illness in such a despicable manner?

Consumers (to the best of my knowledge) still voluntarily make their own choices when they make retail purchases. I have not learned of any lawsuits against the Food and Drug Administration, food manufacturers and retailers for selling "low fat" products under false pretenses for more than 20 years.

Were these small convenience store chains even in business 24 years prior to 2000? Did Salem Lights exist in 1976? I am also curious as to what brand of cigarettes Gerald Krueger now smokes and where his cigarettes are now purchased. I doubt if he has quit smoking voluntarily after so many years.

Garnet Dawn
The Smoker's Club, Inc.

http://www.madisonrecord.com/arguments/argumentsview.asp?c=137683


Tillery's firm sues big tobacco again

By Steve Gonzalez - Edwardsville Bureau Wednesday, December 29, 2004

 Represented by trial attorney giants Korein Tillery of Belleville and SimmonsCooper of East Alton, a Nashville, Ill. couple filed a 12-count lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds (RJR) and Huck's Convenience Store in Madison County Circuit Court Dec. 28 for misrepresenting the amount of tar and nicotine contained in Salem Lights.

Gerald Krueger was diagnosed with lung cancer on Dec. 6, 2000, which he claims was caused by smoking 20-30 Salem Lights a day for more than 24 years.

He didn't know that he was receiving higher levels of tar and nicotine than RJR represented or that the smoke produced by Salem Lights is more mutagenic than regular cigarettes, Krueger claims.

Gerald’s wife, Rebekah Krueger, is also seeking damages alleging she has suffered “loss of the consortium, society, companionship, fellowship and other valuable services of her husband” since he has been diagnosed with cancer.

The Kruegers are seeking at least $600,000 in damages caused by RJR's and Huck’s alleged violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, the Uniform Commercial Code, product liability and negligence.

According to the complaint, the first day Huck’s placed Salem Lights cigarettes into the stream of commerce, Hucks individually and jointly engaged in misrepresentations, unlawful schemes and courses of conduct that induced Krueger to purchase Salem Lights trough unfair and deceptive acts.

“Krueger would not have purchased Salem Lights but for defendant’s unfair and deceptive acts and practices,” the complaint states.

As a result of the alleged unfair practices and acts, Krueger alleges he did not receive lower tar and nicotine cigarettes when he purchased Salem Lights and the defendants allegedly violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, which Krueger claims led to his lung cancer.

Krueger claims he relied upon the implied warranty that Salem Lights were merchantable; however Huck’s allegedly breached the implied warranty in that they were not merchantable.

Rebekah Krueger also claims she is informed and believes that she is entitled to actual damages against Huck’s by reason of loss of consortium and society.

Gerald Krueger filed a lawsuit against RJR, Huck’s, Park N Shop supermarkets and Hit & Run in December 2003, but asked for the case to be dismissed without prejudice.

http://www.madisonrecord.com/news/newsview.asp?c=137478


Dole enters next session more comfortable in the spotlight
Jan 2, 2005 12:40 PM
GREENSBORO, N.C. -- U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole, already a celebrity when elected in 2002, spent most of her first two years in office learning protocol and addressing constituents' needs without fanfare.

But as the November election neared, the Salisbury native hit the campaign circuit from Alaska to Florida, turning up her personal wattage for fellow Republicans ranging from the rank and file to the commander in chief.

This week she becomes North Carolina's senior senator. Dole also assumes a more prominent role on the national stage, heading the effort to elect GOP senators in 2006 as chairwoman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

"I did it because I felt it would be good for the state, and, you know, there are just times when something opens up, and step by step you get more involved," said Dole, 68. "It was not at all some sort of plan, you know, to go from here to there."

With mixed success, Dole plugged away at campaign promises to win full recognition for the Lumbee Indians and to end a Depression-era tobacco quota system.

Opponents argued her Lumbee bill would lead to the tribe opening casinos on Interstate 95, stalling the legislation. Dole said she will continue to press for Lumbee recognition.

In October, Congress approved a $10.1 billion buyout of the Depression-era price support system for tobacco farmers.

"We knew because of her high national profile she'd be a show horse for North Carolina," said Larry Wooten, president of N.C. Farm Bureau. "We didn't know what kind of a workhorse she would be."

Ferrel Guillory, director of the Program on Southern Politics, Media and Public Life at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said Dole's emergence as a partisan leader is no no surprise for someone with her stature and interest in expanding the GOP.

She served in the cabinets of two Republican administrations and is married to one of the party's former presidential nominees, former U.S. Sen. Bob Dole.

"She is dedicated to building and preserving Republican power on the national level," Guillory said, "and that's what she's been doing."

Dole said she would limit travel associated with the senatorial committee role to weekends and congressional breaks to avoid missing votes. That decision comes after Republicans harped on outgoing Democratic Sen. John Edwards for skipping votes to seek the presidency, and Democrats appear ready to hold Dole similarly accountable.

"Let's hope her new national party position will not distract her from issues important to the North Carolina voters who elected her," said Schorr Johnson, a state Democratic Party spokesman.

The Bush administration tapped Dole to run for the Senate post that Republican Jesse Helms was vacating in 2002.

She has largely remained loyal to the administration, backing $330 billion in federal tax cuts, $87 billion for operations in post-invasion Iraq and a parliamentary move that indicated her support for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriages.

Dole differed with the White House's support for relaxing media ownership rules, removing trade barriers with Singapore and permitting an inventory of oil and gas reserves that could lead to drilling off the Outer Banks.

---

Information from: News & Record, http://www.news-record.com

http://newsobserver.com/news/ncwire_news/story/1979477p-8357868c.html


Scott + Scott, LLC's Connecticut Office Files Securities Class Action Against Pfizer in Connecticut Federal District Court - PFE

Lawsuit Filed Soon After Scott's Filing of Merck Case

COLCHESTER, Conn., Dec. 31, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Scott + Scott, LLC (e-mail: nrothstein@scott-scott.com), has filed a class action lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE:PFE) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf of those who purchased or acquired Pfizer, Inc. securities from October 31, 2000 to December 16, 2004 (the "Class Period"). The lawsuit against Pfizer alleges the Company violated the federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading statements during the Class Period. New prescriptions for Pfizer's pain killer Celebrex(r), the leader in a class of drugs called cox-2 inhibitors, plummeted 56% last week just after a federal study found a link between Celebrex(r) and a heightened risk of heart attacks and strokes. Thi

   0 comments

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments